实现生殖正义

Catriona Ida Macleod, Yamini Kalyanaraman, Laurah Mogonong
{"title":"实现生殖正义","authors":"Catriona Ida Macleod, Yamini Kalyanaraman, Laurah Mogonong","doi":"10.1027/2157-3891/a000105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: How may reproductive justice be enacted in services and provider training to further the sustainable development goals of healthy lives and universal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights? We argue for careful baseline qualitative research infused with feminist and reproductive justice theory and, based on the findings of this research, the development and refinement of healthcare provider training through action research. We report on our implementation of this process in developing an in-service person-centered abortion counseling training course aimed at South African abortion healthcare providers. The baseline research consisted of recordings of abortion counseling sessions and interviews with healthcare providers and users. Several problematic directive and anti-abortion interactions were surfaced, which led to the development of a policy brief and step-by-step guidelines for providers. Subsequently, action research was employed to operationalize these guidelines into an in-service person-centered abortion counseling training course, and an iterative process enabled course improvement. Data collected for the course refinement included recordings of various sessions during the course, participants’ reflective journals, case presentations, and feedback forms, as well as interviews conducted two months post the first course. Comparing baseline findings with data collected as part of the action research shows some shifts in healthcare providers’ actions. We report on a shift in respecting bodily autonomy and encouraging autonomous decision-making. Structural and normative barriers continue, however. The enactment of reproductive justice through in-service training shows promise but must be supplemented with advocacy around other barriers.","PeriodicalId":517095,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives in Psychology","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enacting Reproductive Justice\",\"authors\":\"Catriona Ida Macleod, Yamini Kalyanaraman, Laurah Mogonong\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2157-3891/a000105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: How may reproductive justice be enacted in services and provider training to further the sustainable development goals of healthy lives and universal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights? We argue for careful baseline qualitative research infused with feminist and reproductive justice theory and, based on the findings of this research, the development and refinement of healthcare provider training through action research. We report on our implementation of this process in developing an in-service person-centered abortion counseling training course aimed at South African abortion healthcare providers. The baseline research consisted of recordings of abortion counseling sessions and interviews with healthcare providers and users. Several problematic directive and anti-abortion interactions were surfaced, which led to the development of a policy brief and step-by-step guidelines for providers. Subsequently, action research was employed to operationalize these guidelines into an in-service person-centered abortion counseling training course, and an iterative process enabled course improvement. Data collected for the course refinement included recordings of various sessions during the course, participants’ reflective journals, case presentations, and feedback forms, as well as interviews conducted two months post the first course. Comparing baseline findings with data collected as part of the action research shows some shifts in healthcare providers’ actions. We report on a shift in respecting bodily autonomy and encouraging autonomous decision-making. Structural and normative barriers continue, however. The enactment of reproductive justice through in-service training shows promise but must be supplemented with advocacy around other barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Perspectives in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Perspectives in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:如何在服务和提供者培训中体现生殖公正,以促进健康生活和普及性健康和生殖健康及权利的可持续发展目标?我们认为,应进行细致的基线定性研究,其中应融入女权主义和生殖公正理论,并根据研究结果,通过行动研究来发展和完善医疗服务提供者的培训。我们报告了在针对南非人工流产医疗服务提供者开发以人为本的在职人工流产咨询培训课程过程中实施这一过程的情况。基线研究包括人工流产咨询课程的录音以及对医疗服务提供者和使用者的访谈。研究发现了一些有问题的指令性和反堕胎互动,并据此为医疗服务提供者制定了政策简介和分步指南。随后,我们采用行动研究的方法,将这些指导原则落实到以人为本的在职堕胎咨询培训课程中,并通过迭代过程对课程进行改进。为改进课程而收集的数据包括课程中各个环节的录音、参与者的反思日记、案例展示和反馈表,以及在首次课程结束两个月后进行的访谈。将基线研究结果与作为行动研究一部分收集的数据进行比较后发现,医疗服务提供者的行动发生了一些转变。我们报告了在尊重身体自主权和鼓励自主决策方面的转变。然而,结构性和规范性障碍依然存在。通过在职培训实现生殖公正的前景光明,但必须辅之以针对其他障碍的宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enacting Reproductive Justice
Abstract: How may reproductive justice be enacted in services and provider training to further the sustainable development goals of healthy lives and universal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights? We argue for careful baseline qualitative research infused with feminist and reproductive justice theory and, based on the findings of this research, the development and refinement of healthcare provider training through action research. We report on our implementation of this process in developing an in-service person-centered abortion counseling training course aimed at South African abortion healthcare providers. The baseline research consisted of recordings of abortion counseling sessions and interviews with healthcare providers and users. Several problematic directive and anti-abortion interactions were surfaced, which led to the development of a policy brief and step-by-step guidelines for providers. Subsequently, action research was employed to operationalize these guidelines into an in-service person-centered abortion counseling training course, and an iterative process enabled course improvement. Data collected for the course refinement included recordings of various sessions during the course, participants’ reflective journals, case presentations, and feedback forms, as well as interviews conducted two months post the first course. Comparing baseline findings with data collected as part of the action research shows some shifts in healthcare providers’ actions. We report on a shift in respecting bodily autonomy and encouraging autonomous decision-making. Structural and normative barriers continue, however. The enactment of reproductive justice through in-service training shows promise but must be supplemented with advocacy around other barriers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信