用于非重叠失效域多失效模式系统可靠性分析的曲面积分法

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Zhenzhong Chen, H. Mu, Xiaoke Li
{"title":"用于非重叠失效域多失效模式系统可靠性分析的曲面积分法","authors":"Zhenzhong Chen, H. Mu, Xiaoke Li","doi":"10.1115/1.4065857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the study of reliability of systems with multiple failure modes, approximations can be obtained by calculating the probability of failure for each state function. The first-order reliability method and the second-order reliability method are effective, but they may introduce significant errors when dealing with certain nonlinear situations. Simulation methods such as line sampling method and response surface method can solve implicit function problems, but the large amount of calculation results in low efficiency. The curved surface integral method (CSI) has good accuracy in dealing with nonlinear problems. Therefore, a system reliability analysis method (CSIMMS) is proposed on the basis of CSI for solving multiple failure modes system reliability problems with non-overlapping failure domains. The order of magnitude of the failure probability is evaluated based on the reliability index and the degree of nonlinearity, ignoring the influence of low order of magnitude failure modes, and reducing the calculation of the system failure probability. Finally, CSIMMS and other methods are compared by three numerical examples, and the results show the stability and accuracy of the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains\",\"authors\":\"Zhenzhong Chen, H. Mu, Xiaoke Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4065857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the study of reliability of systems with multiple failure modes, approximations can be obtained by calculating the probability of failure for each state function. The first-order reliability method and the second-order reliability method are effective, but they may introduce significant errors when dealing with certain nonlinear situations. Simulation methods such as line sampling method and response surface method can solve implicit function problems, but the large amount of calculation results in low efficiency. The curved surface integral method (CSI) has good accuracy in dealing with nonlinear problems. Therefore, a system reliability analysis method (CSIMMS) is proposed on the basis of CSI for solving multiple failure modes system reliability problems with non-overlapping failure domains. The order of magnitude of the failure probability is evaluated based on the reliability index and the degree of nonlinearity, ignoring the influence of low order of magnitude failure modes, and reducing the calculation of the system failure probability. Finally, CSIMMS and other methods are compared by three numerical examples, and the results show the stability and accuracy of the proposed method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究具有多种失效模式的系统的可靠性时,可以通过计算每个状态函数的失效概率来获得近似值。一阶可靠性方法和二阶可靠性方法虽然有效,但在处理某些非线性情况时可能会引入较大误差。线采样法和响应面法等仿真方法可以解决隐式函数问题,但计算量大,效率低。曲面积分法(CSI)在处理非线性问题时具有良好的精度。因此,在 CSI 的基础上提出了一种系统可靠性分析方法(CSIMMS),用于求解失效域不重叠的多失效模式系统可靠性问题。根据可靠性指数和非线性程度来评估失效概率的数量级,忽略了低数量级失效模式的影响,减少了系统失效概率的计算量。最后,通过三个数值实例对 CSIMMS 和其他方法进行了比较,结果表明了所提方法的稳定性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains
In the study of reliability of systems with multiple failure modes, approximations can be obtained by calculating the probability of failure for each state function. The first-order reliability method and the second-order reliability method are effective, but they may introduce significant errors when dealing with certain nonlinear situations. Simulation methods such as line sampling method and response surface method can solve implicit function problems, but the large amount of calculation results in low efficiency. The curved surface integral method (CSI) has good accuracy in dealing with nonlinear problems. Therefore, a system reliability analysis method (CSIMMS) is proposed on the basis of CSI for solving multiple failure modes system reliability problems with non-overlapping failure domains. The order of magnitude of the failure probability is evaluated based on the reliability index and the degree of nonlinearity, ignoring the influence of low order of magnitude failure modes, and reducing the calculation of the system failure probability. Finally, CSIMMS and other methods are compared by three numerical examples, and the results show the stability and accuracy of the proposed method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信