{"title":"EFL 和 ESL 中的限制性交流","authors":"Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Lea Meriläinen","doi":"10.1075/eww.23001.gil","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English\n as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also\n reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual),\n proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint\n dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of\n embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by\n a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL.\n It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.","PeriodicalId":45502,"journal":{"name":"English World-Wide","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constrained communication in EFL and ESL\",\"authors\":\"Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Lea Meriläinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/eww.23001.gil\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English\\n as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also\\n reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual),\\n proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint\\n dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of\\n embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by\\n a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL.\\n It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English World-Wide\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English World-Wide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.23001.gil\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English World-Wide","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.23001.gil","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English
as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also
reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual),
proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint
dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of
embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by
a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL.
It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.
期刊介绍:
English World-Wide has established itself as the leading and most comprehensive journal dealing with varieties of English. The focus is on scholarly discussions of new findings in the dialectology and sociolinguistics of the English-speaking communities (native and second-language speakers), but general problems of sociolinguistics, creolistics, language planning, multilingualism and modern historical sociolinguistics are included if they have a direct bearing on modern varieties of English. Although teaching problems are normally excluded, English World-Wide provides important background information for all those involved in teaching English throughout the world.