EFL 和 ESL 中的限制性交流

IF 0.8 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Lea Meriläinen
{"title":"EFL 和 ESL 中的限制性交流","authors":"Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Lea Meriläinen","doi":"10.1075/eww.23001.gil","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English\n as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also\n reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual),\n proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint\n dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of\n embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by\n a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL.\n It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.","PeriodicalId":45502,"journal":{"name":"English World-Wide","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constrained communication in EFL and ESL\",\"authors\":\"Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Lea Meriläinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/eww.23001.gil\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English\\n as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also\\n reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual),\\n proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint\\n dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of\\n embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by\\n a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL.\\n It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English World-Wide\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English World-Wide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.23001.gil\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English World-Wide","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.23001.gil","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究基于限制性交际框架,比较嵌入式倒装在作为外语的英语(EFL)和作为第二语言的英语(ESL)中的使用情况。本研究基于多个 EFL 和 ESL(子)语料库,同时也参考了母语为英语的语料库,这些语料库在语言激活(单语/双语)、熟练程度(母语使用者/熟练的 L2 使用者/学习者)和模式(语音/书写)等限制维度上存在差异。除了这些制约因素外,我们还研究了语言因素可能产生的影响,这些因素据称在嵌入式倒装的使用中发挥了作用。通过对嵌入式倒装句和标准间接疑问句的多因素分析,以及对嵌入式倒装句使用模式的仔细研究,揭示了 EFL 和 ESL 的共同特点和独特之处。它还强调了语言因素和多样性/L1 的重要性,以及它们与交际限制之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constrained communication in EFL and ESL
This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual), proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL. It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
English World-Wide
English World-Wide Multiple-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: English World-Wide has established itself as the leading and most comprehensive journal dealing with varieties of English. The focus is on scholarly discussions of new findings in the dialectology and sociolinguistics of the English-speaking communities (native and second-language speakers), but general problems of sociolinguistics, creolistics, language planning, multilingualism and modern historical sociolinguistics are included if they have a direct bearing on modern varieties of English. Although teaching problems are normally excluded, English World-Wide provides important background information for all those involved in teaching English throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信