东亚和东南亚执业医师的持续专业发展状况

D. Samarasekera, Shuh Shing Lee, S. Yeo, Julie Chen, Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Budi Wiweko, V. Nadarajah, C. Thuraisingham, Jen-Hung Yang, Lawrence Sherman
{"title":"东亚和东南亚执业医师的持续专业发展状况","authors":"D. Samarasekera, Shuh Shing Lee, S. Yeo, Julie Chen, Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Budi Wiweko, V. Nadarajah, C. Thuraisingham, Jen-Hung Yang, Lawrence Sherman","doi":"10.29060/taps.2024-9-3/oa3045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement.\nMethods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories.\nResults: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%-56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration.\nConclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants.\n\nKeywords: Medical Education, Health Profession Education, Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation","PeriodicalId":494652,"journal":{"name":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners\",\"authors\":\"D. Samarasekera, Shuh Shing Lee, S. Yeo, Julie Chen, Ardi Findyartini, Nadia Greviana, Budi Wiweko, V. Nadarajah, C. Thuraisingham, Jen-Hung Yang, Lawrence Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.29060/taps.2024-9-3/oa3045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement.\\nMethods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories.\\nResults: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%-56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration.\\nConclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants.\\n\\nKeywords: Medical Education, Health Profession Education, Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation\",\"PeriodicalId\":494652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Asia Pacific Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-3/oa3045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia Pacific Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29060/taps.2024-9-3/oa3045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:继续医学教育和继续职业发展活动(CME/CPD)可以提高医疗从业人员的业务水平,使他们能够提供高质量的临床医疗服务。然而,各国监督继续医学教育/继续职业发展活动的系统以及围绕设计、实施和认证的流程却大相径庭。本研究从执业医师的角度探讨了东亚和东南亚地区继续医学教育/继续职业培训的现状,并提出了改进建议:方法:在香港、印度尼西亚、马来西亚、新加坡和台湾的五家机构开展了一项多中心研究。研究工具是一份包含 28 个项目(27 个李克特五点量表和 1 个开放式项目)的验证问卷,重点是对当前继续医学教育/继续医学发展的内容、流程和差距的看法,并由各参与研究机构的教育专家进一步进行背景分析。对定量数据进行了描述性分析,对开放式项目的数据进行了类似分类:共有 867 名执业医师参与了研究。在对当前继续医学教育/继续医学发展项目的看法方面,75.34%至88.00%的受访者认为继续医学教育/继续医学发展项目提高了他们提供优质临床医疗服务的技能和能力。在制药业支持的继续医学教育/继续职业培训方面,商业影响问题十分明显,只有 30.24%-56.92% 的受访者认为其所在机构的继续医学教育/继续职业培训不存在商业偏见。未来继续医学教育/继续医学发展需要改进的关键领域包括:1)内容和授课方式;2)独立性和资金;3)管理;4)地点和可及性;5)政策和合作:结论:对于参加继续医学教育/继续职业培训的人员来说,主要的考虑因素是:由公正的内容提供者利用不同的学习模式提供可获取的、与实践相关的内容,并遵守透明、严格的认证程序,同时尽量减少行政管理方面的麻烦:医学教育、卫生职业教育、继续职业发展、继续医学教育、认证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The state of Continuing Professional Development in East and Southeast Asia among the medical practitioners
Introduction: Continuing medical education and continuing professional development activities (CME/CPD) improve the practice of medical practitioners and allowing them to deliver quality clinical care. However, the systems that oversee CME/CPD as well as the processes around design, delivery, and accreditation vary widely across countries. This study explores the state of CME/CPD in the East and South East Asian region from the perspective of medical practitioners, and makes recommendations for improvement. Methods: A multi-centre study was conducted across five institutions in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The study instrument was a 28-item (27 five-point Likert scale and 1 open-ended items) validated questionnaire that focused on perceptions of the current content, processes and gaps in CME/CPD and further contextualised by educational experts from each participating site. Descriptive analysis was undertaken for quantitative data while the data from open-ended item was categorised into similar categories. Results: A total of 867 medical practitioners participated in the study. For perceptions on current CME/CPD programme, 75.34% to 88.00% of respondents agreed that CME/CPD increased their skills and competence in providing quality clinical care. For the domain on pharmaceutical industry-supported CME/CPD, the issue of commercial influence was apparent with only 30.24%-56.92% of respondents believing that the CME/CPD in their institution was free from commercial bias. Key areas for improvement for future CME/CPD included 1) content and mode of delivery, 2) independence and funding, 3) administration, 4) location and accessibility and 5) policy and collaboration. Conclusion: Accessible, practice-relevant content using diverse learning modalities offered by unbiased content providers and subject to transparent and rigorous accreditation processes with minimal administrative hassle are the main considerations for CME/CPD participants. Keywords: Medical Education, Health Profession Education, Continuing Professional Development, Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信