{"title":"量身定制的招聘模式。阿根廷家政工作中的数字中介。","authors":"Ania Tizziani, L. Poblete, Francisca Pereyra","doi":"10.7440/res89.2024.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of studies on digital intermediaries in the domestic and care work sector, some studies claim that they exacerbate and perpetuate the precariousness of work in the sector and the social inequalities that underpin it, while others highlight the ambivalence of their effects. Drawing on these perspectives, but focusing on the organizational structures that digital platforms adopt, the article proposes to understand the differential effects of the different modes of intervention that they develop in each context according to their specificity. Based on the study of the digital platform Zolvers in Argentina, the article analyzes how it adapts to a sector of activity crossed by two opposing trends: the formalization of labor relations and the increase in hourly work. This adaptation has resulted in three types of contract: regular contracts managed by the digital platform, regular contracts managed by the employer households and temporary contracts. Although domestic workers use these modalities indistinctly, even accumulating jobs that correspond to all of them, the effects in terms of working conditions are very different. While the first two fall within the legal framework governing the sector, the third falls outside of the scope. In the first, the intervention of the platform produces a kind of automation of the respect of certain rights. The regular contracting modality without platform management produces more heterogeneous working conditions because the legal framework is questioned in its application by employers. In the temporary mode, working conditions are extremely precarious as they are sporadic jobs lasting only a few hours. This research used a quantitative-qualitative methodology that included a survey of 300 domestic workers, 20 semi-directed interviews with workers, two focus groups with workers and four focus groups with employers using Zolvers.","PeriodicalId":46119,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Estudios Sociales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modalidades de contratación a medida. La intermediación digital en el trabajo doméstico en Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Ania Tizziani, L. Poblete, Francisca Pereyra\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/res89.2024.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the field of studies on digital intermediaries in the domestic and care work sector, some studies claim that they exacerbate and perpetuate the precariousness of work in the sector and the social inequalities that underpin it, while others highlight the ambivalence of their effects. Drawing on these perspectives, but focusing on the organizational structures that digital platforms adopt, the article proposes to understand the differential effects of the different modes of intervention that they develop in each context according to their specificity. Based on the study of the digital platform Zolvers in Argentina, the article analyzes how it adapts to a sector of activity crossed by two opposing trends: the formalization of labor relations and the increase in hourly work. This adaptation has resulted in three types of contract: regular contracts managed by the digital platform, regular contracts managed by the employer households and temporary contracts. Although domestic workers use these modalities indistinctly, even accumulating jobs that correspond to all of them, the effects in terms of working conditions are very different. While the first two fall within the legal framework governing the sector, the third falls outside of the scope. In the first, the intervention of the platform produces a kind of automation of the respect of certain rights. The regular contracting modality without platform management produces more heterogeneous working conditions because the legal framework is questioned in its application by employers. In the temporary mode, working conditions are extremely precarious as they are sporadic jobs lasting only a few hours. This research used a quantitative-qualitative methodology that included a survey of 300 domestic workers, 20 semi-directed interviews with workers, two focus groups with workers and four focus groups with employers using Zolvers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Estudios Sociales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Estudios Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/res89.2024.07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Estudios Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/res89.2024.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modalidades de contratación a medida. La intermediación digital en el trabajo doméstico en Argentina
In the field of studies on digital intermediaries in the domestic and care work sector, some studies claim that they exacerbate and perpetuate the precariousness of work in the sector and the social inequalities that underpin it, while others highlight the ambivalence of their effects. Drawing on these perspectives, but focusing on the organizational structures that digital platforms adopt, the article proposes to understand the differential effects of the different modes of intervention that they develop in each context according to their specificity. Based on the study of the digital platform Zolvers in Argentina, the article analyzes how it adapts to a sector of activity crossed by two opposing trends: the formalization of labor relations and the increase in hourly work. This adaptation has resulted in three types of contract: regular contracts managed by the digital platform, regular contracts managed by the employer households and temporary contracts. Although domestic workers use these modalities indistinctly, even accumulating jobs that correspond to all of them, the effects in terms of working conditions are very different. While the first two fall within the legal framework governing the sector, the third falls outside of the scope. In the first, the intervention of the platform produces a kind of automation of the respect of certain rights. The regular contracting modality without platform management produces more heterogeneous working conditions because the legal framework is questioned in its application by employers. In the temporary mode, working conditions are extremely precarious as they are sporadic jobs lasting only a few hours. This research used a quantitative-qualitative methodology that included a survey of 300 domestic workers, 20 semi-directed interviews with workers, two focus groups with workers and four focus groups with employers using Zolvers.
期刊介绍:
Revista de Estudios Sociales (rev. estud.soc.) is an indexed publication of a periodical nature, which adheres to international standards of quality, positioning, periodicity and availability on line. Its objective is to contribute to the dissemination of the research, analyses and opinions that the national and international academic community elaborates. As a social sciences journal, it publishes the results of investigations, reflections on relevant topics, theoretical revisions and reviews, which contribute to pertinent debates about sociological, historical, anthropological, cultural and gender study subjects, as well as articles on political science, philosophy, psychology and education. Is a quarterly publication (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December) that comes out at the beginning of each of these periods, created in1998 and funded by the School of Social Sciences of the Universidad de los Andes (Colombia). All of its digital contents are of open access through its website. The printed version has a cost and may be acquired at specific outlets. The Journal publisehs articles in Spanish, English and Portuguese.