不同养分管理方法对基莫尔高原和萨特普拉丘陵农业气候区大豆土壤理化性质和经济性的影响

Mansi Joshi, RP Sahu, Kamalkant Yadav, Shani Gulaiya, Saurabh Singh Pal, Manish Kumar, Nandini Singh, Ashutosh Singh Rajpoot
{"title":"不同养分管理方法对基莫尔高原和萨特普拉丘陵农业气候区大豆土壤理化性质和经济性的影响","authors":"Mansi Joshi, RP Sahu, Kamalkant Yadav, Shani Gulaiya, Saurabh Singh Pal, Manish Kumar, Nandini Singh, Ashutosh Singh Rajpoot","doi":"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field trial was conducted at Krishi Nagar Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India, during the kharif season of 2021. The field experiment comprised six treatments and was conducted in a randomized block design (RBD) with four replications. Results showed a slight reduction in soil pH in treatments 100% Organic NM, 50% Organic NM + NF inputs BJG, 50% Organic + 50% Inorganic NM, and 25% Organic + NF inputs BJG + 25% Inorganic NM, while an increase was observed in T5 and T6 compared to the initial soil status. Changes in EC and OC under various treatments were not significant, but available N, P, and K levels varied significantly across treatments, showing increased values from the initial soil status. The treatment with 100% Organic NM had the highest cost of cultivation (Rs.31624), gross monetary return (Rs. 58605/ha), net monetary return (Rs. 26982/ha), and B:C ratio (1.85), followed by the treatment with 50% Organic NM + NF inputs.","PeriodicalId":14186,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Different Nutrient Management Practices on Soil Physico-chemical Properties and Economics of Soybean in Kymore Plateau and Satpura Hills Agro-climatic Zone\",\"authors\":\"Mansi Joshi, RP Sahu, Kamalkant Yadav, Shani Gulaiya, Saurabh Singh Pal, Manish Kumar, Nandini Singh, Ashutosh Singh Rajpoot\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The field trial was conducted at Krishi Nagar Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India, during the kharif season of 2021. The field experiment comprised six treatments and was conducted in a randomized block design (RBD) with four replications. Results showed a slight reduction in soil pH in treatments 100% Organic NM, 50% Organic NM + NF inputs BJG, 50% Organic + 50% Inorganic NM, and 25% Organic + NF inputs BJG + 25% Inorganic NM, while an increase was observed in T5 and T6 compared to the initial soil status. Changes in EC and OC under various treatments were not significant, but available N, P, and K levels varied significantly across treatments, showing increased values from the initial soil status. The treatment with 100% Organic NM had the highest cost of cultivation (Rs.31624), gross monetary return (Rs. 58605/ha), net monetary return (Rs. 26982/ha), and B:C ratio (1.85), followed by the treatment with 50% Organic NM + NF inputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"volume\":\" 34\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

田间试验于 2021 年印度中央邦贾巴尔普尔 Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya 农学院农学系 Krishi Nagar 农场进行。田间试验包括六个处理,采用随机区组设计(RBD),四个重复。结果表明,与最初的土壤状况相比,100% 有机 NM、50% 有机 NM + NF 投入 BJG、50% 有机 + 50% 无机 NM 和 25% 有机 + NF 投入 BJG + 25% 无机 NM 处理下的土壤 pH 值略有下降,而 T5 和 T6 处理下的土壤 pH 值有所上升。不同处理下的 EC 和 OC 变化不明显,但各处理的可利用氮、磷和钾含量变化很大,与最初的土壤状况相比,可利用氮、磷和钾含量都有所增加。采用 100% 有机 NM 的处理的种植成本(31624 卢比)、总货币收益(58605 卢比/公顷)、净货币收益(26982 卢比/公顷)和 B:C 比率(1.85)最高,其次是采用 50% 有机 NM + NF 投入的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Different Nutrient Management Practices on Soil Physico-chemical Properties and Economics of Soybean in Kymore Plateau and Satpura Hills Agro-climatic Zone
The field trial was conducted at Krishi Nagar Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India, during the kharif season of 2021. The field experiment comprised six treatments and was conducted in a randomized block design (RBD) with four replications. Results showed a slight reduction in soil pH in treatments 100% Organic NM, 50% Organic NM + NF inputs BJG, 50% Organic + 50% Inorganic NM, and 25% Organic + NF inputs BJG + 25% Inorganic NM, while an increase was observed in T5 and T6 compared to the initial soil status. Changes in EC and OC under various treatments were not significant, but available N, P, and K levels varied significantly across treatments, showing increased values from the initial soil status. The treatment with 100% Organic NM had the highest cost of cultivation (Rs.31624), gross monetary return (Rs. 58605/ha), net monetary return (Rs. 26982/ha), and B:C ratio (1.85), followed by the treatment with 50% Organic NM + NF inputs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信