杂草管理方法对黑禾禾本科作物(Vigna mungo L.)养分含量及其吸收的影响

Abhishek Sanspal, Jay Nath Patel, Mohd Shah Alam
{"title":"杂草管理方法对黑禾禾本科作物(Vigna mungo L.)养分含量及其吸收的影响","authors":"Abhishek Sanspal, Jay Nath Patel, Mohd Shah Alam","doi":"10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To study the effect of weed management practices on nutrient content and uptake by black gram. \nStudy Design: Randomized block design. \nPlace and Duration of Study: One year field experiment at Research Farm, School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Chail Chowk, Mandi, (H.P.). \nMethodology: The experiment was conducted with three replications and seven treatments viz.- T1 = Weedy check, T2 = Weed free, T3 = Hand weeding (20 & 40 DAS), T4 = Imazethapyr @ 70 g ha-1 (PE) + Hand weeding (30 DAS), T5 = Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + Hand weeding (30 DAS), T6 = Pendimethalin + Imazethapyr 900 g a.i. ha-1 (3-4 leaf stage), T7 = Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i. ha-1 (PoE). \nResults: The study of data revealed non-significant impact of weed management practices on nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in grains and straw of black gram crop, whereas, the maximum content of all these nutrients were found under treatment T2. However, the application of treatment T2 also recorded the significantly maximum uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop, which was statistically at par with treatment T3. The minimum content of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in grains, straw and along with their uptake by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop were found under treatment T1 = Weedy check during the field experiment. \nConclusion: This study showed non-significant effect of weed management practices on the nutrient content in grains and straw of black gram, while, it has significantly affected the nutrient uptake by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop.","PeriodicalId":16985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research and Reports","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Weed Management Practices on Nutrient Content and Their Uptake by Black Gram Crop (Vigna mungo L.)\",\"authors\":\"Abhishek Sanspal, Jay Nath Patel, Mohd Shah Alam\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To study the effect of weed management practices on nutrient content and uptake by black gram. \\nStudy Design: Randomized block design. \\nPlace and Duration of Study: One year field experiment at Research Farm, School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Chail Chowk, Mandi, (H.P.). \\nMethodology: The experiment was conducted with three replications and seven treatments viz.- T1 = Weedy check, T2 = Weed free, T3 = Hand weeding (20 & 40 DAS), T4 = Imazethapyr @ 70 g ha-1 (PE) + Hand weeding (30 DAS), T5 = Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + Hand weeding (30 DAS), T6 = Pendimethalin + Imazethapyr 900 g a.i. ha-1 (3-4 leaf stage), T7 = Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i. ha-1 (PoE). \\nResults: The study of data revealed non-significant impact of weed management practices on nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in grains and straw of black gram crop, whereas, the maximum content of all these nutrients were found under treatment T2. However, the application of treatment T2 also recorded the significantly maximum uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop, which was statistically at par with treatment T3. The minimum content of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in grains, straw and along with their uptake by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop were found under treatment T1 = Weedy check during the field experiment. \\nConclusion: This study showed non-significant effect of weed management practices on the nutrient content in grains and straw of black gram, while, it has significantly affected the nutrient uptake by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientific Research and Reports\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientific Research and Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究杂草管理方法对黑穗醋栗养分含量和吸收的影响。研究设计:随机区组设计。研究地点和时间:在曼迪(H.P.)柴尔周克阿卜希拉希大学农学院研究农场进行为期一年的田间试验。实验方法:试验采用三次重复和七种处理,即T1 = 杂草检查,T2 = 无杂草,T3 = 人工除草(20 和 40 DAS),T4 = 咪草烟 @ 70 g ha-1 (PE) + 人工除草(30 DAS),T5 = 甲草胺 @ 1.0 kg a. i. ha-1 (PE) + 1.0 kg a. i. ha-1 (PE) + 1.0 kg a. i. ha-1 (PE) + 1.0 kg a. i. ha-1 (PE)公顷-1(PE)+人工除草(30 DAS),T6 = 吡嘧磺隆 + 吡嘧磺隆 900 克活性成分公顷-1(3-4 叶期),T7 = 吡嘧磺隆 + 稻瘟灵 @ 70 克活性成分公顷-1(PoE)。研究结果数据研究表明,杂草管理方法对黑禾谷物和秸秆中氮、磷、钾的影响不显著,而在处理 T2 中,所有这些养分的含量最高。然而,施用处理 T2 时,黑禾秆和谷物对氮、磷、钾的吸收量和总吸收量也明显最大,在统计学上与处理 T3 相当。在田间试验中发现,处理 T1 = 杂草对照下,谷物、秸秆中氮、磷、钾的含量最低,谷物、秸秆对氮、磷、钾的吸收量和黑糯米作物对氮、磷、钾的总吸收量也最低。结论本研究表明,杂草管理方法对黑禾谷粒和秸秆中养分含量的影响不显著,但对黑禾谷粒、秸秆和黑禾作物对养分的总吸收量有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Weed Management Practices on Nutrient Content and Their Uptake by Black Gram Crop (Vigna mungo L.)
Aim: To study the effect of weed management practices on nutrient content and uptake by black gram. Study Design: Randomized block design. Place and Duration of Study: One year field experiment at Research Farm, School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Chail Chowk, Mandi, (H.P.). Methodology: The experiment was conducted with three replications and seven treatments viz.- T1 = Weedy check, T2 = Weed free, T3 = Hand weeding (20 & 40 DAS), T4 = Imazethapyr @ 70 g ha-1 (PE) + Hand weeding (30 DAS), T5 = Metolachlor @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 (PE) + Hand weeding (30 DAS), T6 = Pendimethalin + Imazethapyr 900 g a.i. ha-1 (3-4 leaf stage), T7 = Imazethapyr + Imazamox @ 70 g a.i. ha-1 (PoE). Results: The study of data revealed non-significant impact of weed management practices on nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in grains and straw of black gram crop, whereas, the maximum content of all these nutrients were found under treatment T2. However, the application of treatment T2 also recorded the significantly maximum uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop, which was statistically at par with treatment T3. The minimum content of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium in grains, straw and along with their uptake by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop were found under treatment T1 = Weedy check during the field experiment. Conclusion: This study showed non-significant effect of weed management practices on the nutrient content in grains and straw of black gram, while, it has significantly affected the nutrient uptake by grains, straw and total uptake by black gram crop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信