Aistė Kučinskienė, Viktorija Šeina, Saulius Vasiliauskas
{"title":"后苏联时期立陶宛学派的两位苏联经典作家:佩特拉斯-契维尔卡和萨洛梅亚-涅里斯","authors":"Aistė Kučinskienė, Viktorija Šeina, Saulius Vasiliauskas","doi":"10.51554/coll.24.53.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the place of two Lithuanian writers, Salomėja Nėris (1909–1947) and Petras Cvirka (1904–1945), in the high school canon of Lithuanian literature in the post-Soviet period. First, the canonisation of these writers in the Soviet Lithuanian school system is analysed, or more precisely, in school curricula and textbooks from that time. Afterwards, we examine the revision of their canonical position after the restoration of Lithuania’s independence (1990). The research applies the socio-cultural methodological approach of canon research. A large sample of sources is used: school curricula, textbooks, readers, press publications, and other contextual materials. The study has revealed the different evaluation of Nėris and Cvirka in post-Soviet schools, which is largely due to differences in writers’ biographies. Since Cvirka consistently held and expressed left-wing and later pro-Soviet views in his work throughout his life, his oeuvre gradually disappeared from the upper school curriculum as the de-sovietisation of Lithuanian culture took place in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Nėris, on the contrary, has retained her central position in the school canon in the post-Soviet period. When her last collection of poems was first published in the late 20th century, in the order Nėris’ herself had wanted, it became possible to reposition certain aspects of her life and work. ","PeriodicalId":37193,"journal":{"name":"Colloquia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Du sovietinio kanono autoriai posovietinėje Lietuvos mokykloje: Petras Cvirka ir Salomėja Nėris\",\"authors\":\"Aistė Kučinskienė, Viktorija Šeina, Saulius Vasiliauskas\",\"doi\":\"10.51554/coll.24.53.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the place of two Lithuanian writers, Salomėja Nėris (1909–1947) and Petras Cvirka (1904–1945), in the high school canon of Lithuanian literature in the post-Soviet period. First, the canonisation of these writers in the Soviet Lithuanian school system is analysed, or more precisely, in school curricula and textbooks from that time. Afterwards, we examine the revision of their canonical position after the restoration of Lithuania’s independence (1990). The research applies the socio-cultural methodological approach of canon research. A large sample of sources is used: school curricula, textbooks, readers, press publications, and other contextual materials. The study has revealed the different evaluation of Nėris and Cvirka in post-Soviet schools, which is largely due to differences in writers’ biographies. Since Cvirka consistently held and expressed left-wing and later pro-Soviet views in his work throughout his life, his oeuvre gradually disappeared from the upper school curriculum as the de-sovietisation of Lithuanian culture took place in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Nėris, on the contrary, has retained her central position in the school canon in the post-Soviet period. When her last collection of poems was first published in the late 20th century, in the order Nėris’ herself had wanted, it became possible to reposition certain aspects of her life and work. \",\"PeriodicalId\":37193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colloquia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colloquia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.24.53.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51554/coll.24.53.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Du sovietinio kanono autoriai posovietinėje Lietuvos mokykloje: Petras Cvirka ir Salomėja Nėris
The article examines the place of two Lithuanian writers, Salomėja Nėris (1909–1947) and Petras Cvirka (1904–1945), in the high school canon of Lithuanian literature in the post-Soviet period. First, the canonisation of these writers in the Soviet Lithuanian school system is analysed, or more precisely, in school curricula and textbooks from that time. Afterwards, we examine the revision of their canonical position after the restoration of Lithuania’s independence (1990). The research applies the socio-cultural methodological approach of canon research. A large sample of sources is used: school curricula, textbooks, readers, press publications, and other contextual materials. The study has revealed the different evaluation of Nėris and Cvirka in post-Soviet schools, which is largely due to differences in writers’ biographies. Since Cvirka consistently held and expressed left-wing and later pro-Soviet views in his work throughout his life, his oeuvre gradually disappeared from the upper school curriculum as the de-sovietisation of Lithuanian culture took place in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Nėris, on the contrary, has retained her central position in the school canon in the post-Soviet period. When her last collection of poems was first published in the late 20th century, in the order Nėris’ herself had wanted, it became possible to reposition certain aspects of her life and work.