用于水质预测的计算机器学习分析技术

Q4 Mathematics
Nitya Nand Jha, R. Singh, Sushila Sharma, Abhishek Kumar
{"title":"用于水质预测的计算机器学习分析技术","authors":"Nitya Nand Jha, R. Singh, Sushila Sharma, Abhishek Kumar","doi":"10.52783/cana.v31.942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In terms of impacts on ecosystems, industry, people, and flora and fauna, water quality is paramount. Contamination and pollution have degraded water quality in recent decades. Predicting WQC and Water Quality Index (WQI) is the problem of this article; WQI is an important measure of water validity. This research use machine learning approaches to forecast WQI and WQC, and it does so by optimizing and tweaking the parameters of several machine learning models. Parameter optimization and tuning for four classification models and four regression models both make use of grid search, an essential tool in both contexts. To forecast WQC, classification models such as Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Adaptive Boosting (Ada-Boost) are used. Predicting WQI is done using regression models such as K-nearest neighbour (KNN), decision tree (DT), support vector regression (SVR), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Data normalization and data imputation (mean imputation) were also executed as pretreatment steps to suit the data and make it convenient for any further processing. Seven characteristics and ninety-one cases make up the dataset used for this research. Five evaluation measures were calculated to evaluate the classification systems' effectiveness: accuracy, recall, precision, Matthews' Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and F1 score. A total of four evaluation metrics were calculated to measure the efficacy of the regression models: MAE, MedAE,MSE, and R2. The results of the testing showed that the GB model yielded the most accurate predictions of WQC values (99.50%), making it the top performer in terms of categorization. The experimental findings show that the MLP regressor model got a value of 99.8 percent R2 when predicting WQI values, making it the best performing model in regression.","PeriodicalId":40036,"journal":{"name":"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Machine Learning Analytics for Prediction of Water Quality\",\"authors\":\"Nitya Nand Jha, R. Singh, Sushila Sharma, Abhishek Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.52783/cana.v31.942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In terms of impacts on ecosystems, industry, people, and flora and fauna, water quality is paramount. Contamination and pollution have degraded water quality in recent decades. Predicting WQC and Water Quality Index (WQI) is the problem of this article; WQI is an important measure of water validity. This research use machine learning approaches to forecast WQI and WQC, and it does so by optimizing and tweaking the parameters of several machine learning models. Parameter optimization and tuning for four classification models and four regression models both make use of grid search, an essential tool in both contexts. To forecast WQC, classification models such as Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Adaptive Boosting (Ada-Boost) are used. Predicting WQI is done using regression models such as K-nearest neighbour (KNN), decision tree (DT), support vector regression (SVR), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Data normalization and data imputation (mean imputation) were also executed as pretreatment steps to suit the data and make it convenient for any further processing. Seven characteristics and ninety-one cases make up the dataset used for this research. Five evaluation measures were calculated to evaluate the classification systems' effectiveness: accuracy, recall, precision, Matthews' Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and F1 score. A total of four evaluation metrics were calculated to measure the efficacy of the regression models: MAE, MedAE,MSE, and R2. The results of the testing showed that the GB model yielded the most accurate predictions of WQC values (99.50%), making it the top performer in terms of categorization. The experimental findings show that the MLP regressor model got a value of 99.8 percent R2 when predicting WQI values, making it the best performing model in regression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v31.942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就对生态系统、工业、人类和动植物的影响而言,水质至关重要。近几十年来,污染使水质恶化。预测 WQC 和水质指数(WQI)是本文要解决的问题;WQI 是衡量水质有效性的重要指标。本研究采用机器学习方法预测 WQI 和 WQC,并通过优化和调整多个机器学习模型的参数来实现。四个分类模型和四个回归模型的参数优化和调整都使用了网格搜索,这在两种情况下都是必不可少的工具。为了预测 WQC,使用了随机森林 (RF)、极端梯度提升 (Xgboost)、梯度提升 (GB) 和自适应提升 (Ada-Boost) 等分类模型。预测 WQI 采用回归模型,如 K-近邻(KNN)、决策树(DT)、支持向量回归(SVR)和多层感知器(MLP)。数据归一化和数据估算(平均估算)也作为预处理步骤执行,以适应数据并方便进一步处理。七种特征和 91 个案例构成了本研究使用的数据集。为评价分类系统的有效性,计算了五个评价指标:准确度、召回率、精确度、马修斯相关系数(MCC)和 F1 分数。共计算了四个评价指标来衡量回归模型的有效性:MAE、MedAE、MSE 和 R2。测试结果表明,GB 模型对 WQC 值的预测准确率最高(99.50%),在分类方面表现最佳。实验结果表明,MLP 回归模型预测 WQI 值的 R2 值为 99.8%,是回归模型中表现最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational Machine Learning Analytics for Prediction of Water Quality
In terms of impacts on ecosystems, industry, people, and flora and fauna, water quality is paramount. Contamination and pollution have degraded water quality in recent decades. Predicting WQC and Water Quality Index (WQI) is the problem of this article; WQI is an important measure of water validity. This research use machine learning approaches to forecast WQI and WQC, and it does so by optimizing and tweaking the parameters of several machine learning models. Parameter optimization and tuning for four classification models and four regression models both make use of grid search, an essential tool in both contexts. To forecast WQC, classification models such as Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Adaptive Boosting (Ada-Boost) are used. Predicting WQI is done using regression models such as K-nearest neighbour (KNN), decision tree (DT), support vector regression (SVR), and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Data normalization and data imputation (mean imputation) were also executed as pretreatment steps to suit the data and make it convenient for any further processing. Seven characteristics and ninety-one cases make up the dataset used for this research. Five evaluation measures were calculated to evaluate the classification systems' effectiveness: accuracy, recall, precision, Matthews' Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and F1 score. A total of four evaluation metrics were calculated to measure the efficacy of the regression models: MAE, MedAE,MSE, and R2. The results of the testing showed that the GB model yielded the most accurate predictions of WQC values (99.50%), making it the top performer in terms of categorization. The experimental findings show that the MLP regressor model got a value of 99.8 percent R2 when predicting WQI values, making it the best performing model in regression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信