历史的正确一面?当代女权主义对进步叙事的政治运用

Catherine Andrews
{"title":"历史的正确一面?当代女权主义对进步叙事的政治运用","authors":"Catherine Andrews","doi":"10.18234/secuencia.v0i120.2309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines how the narrative of historical progress is used in contemporary feminisms. It argues that this narrative is used with a specific political aim: to characterise disagreements between feminists as confrontations between the modern and the retrograde. It observes that this positioning often employs patriarchal rhetoric which prefers personal criticism to a discussion of ideas. To illustrate this hypothesis, the article analyses the use of the progress narrative in the present debate about the sex trade within a wide historical context. Undertaking the history of women’s ideas in this way reveals how some arguments in this debate have been disfigured and misunderstood in order to serve the needs of the progress narrative.","PeriodicalId":510091,"journal":{"name":"Secuencia","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Right Side of History? The Political Use of the Narrative of Progress in Contemporary Feminisms\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.18234/secuencia.v0i120.2309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay examines how the narrative of historical progress is used in contemporary feminisms. It argues that this narrative is used with a specific political aim: to characterise disagreements between feminists as confrontations between the modern and the retrograde. It observes that this positioning often employs patriarchal rhetoric which prefers personal criticism to a discussion of ideas. To illustrate this hypothesis, the article analyses the use of the progress narrative in the present debate about the sex trade within a wide historical context. Undertaking the history of women’s ideas in this way reveals how some arguments in this debate have been disfigured and misunderstood in order to serve the needs of the progress narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Secuencia\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Secuencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18234/secuencia.v0i120.2309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secuencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18234/secuencia.v0i120.2309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了当代女权主义是如何使用历史进步叙事的。文章认为,这种叙事的使用有其特定的政治目的:将女权主义者之间的分歧定性为现代与倒退之间的对抗。文章指出,这种定位经常使用父权制的修辞,更倾向于个人批评而非思想讨论。为了说明这一假设,文章在广泛的历史背景下分析了当前关于性交易的辩论中使用的进步叙事。以这种方式研究妇女思想史,揭示了这场辩论中的一些论点是如何被篡改和误解,以满足进步叙事的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Right Side of History? The Political Use of the Narrative of Progress in Contemporary Feminisms
This essay examines how the narrative of historical progress is used in contemporary feminisms. It argues that this narrative is used with a specific political aim: to characterise disagreements between feminists as confrontations between the modern and the retrograde. It observes that this positioning often employs patriarchal rhetoric which prefers personal criticism to a discussion of ideas. To illustrate this hypothesis, the article analyses the use of the progress narrative in the present debate about the sex trade within a wide historical context. Undertaking the history of women’s ideas in this way reveals how some arguments in this debate have been disfigured and misunderstood in order to serve the needs of the progress narrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信