神经外科患者的术中目标导向液体疗法:系统综述

Q3 Medicine
Chayanika Kutum, Prashant Lakhe, Niraj Ghimire, A. Bc, Uzma Begum, Karandeep Singh
{"title":"神经外科患者的术中目标导向液体疗法:系统综述","authors":"Chayanika Kutum, Prashant Lakhe, Niraj Ghimire, A. Bc, Uzma Begum, Karandeep Singh","doi":"10.25259/sni_412_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPerioperative fluid management is critical in neurosurgery as over perfusion can lead to brain edema whereas under perfusion may lead to brain hypoperfusion or ischemia. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in patients undergoing intracranial surgeries.\n\n\n\nWe searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and forward-backward citations for studies published between database inception and February 22, 2024. Randomized controlled trials where intraoperative GDFT was performed in neurosurgery and compared to the conventional regime were included in the study. GDFT was compared with the conventional regime as per primary outcomes – total intraoperative fluid requirement, serum lactate, hemodynamics, brain relaxation, urine output, serum biochemistry, and secondary outcomes – intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. The quality of evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024518816).\n\n\n\nOf 75 records identified, eight were eligible, the majority of which had a low to moderate risk of overall bias. In four studies, more fluid was given in the control group. No difference in postoperative lactate values was noted in 50% of studies. In the remaining 50%, lactate was more in the control group. Three out of four studies did not find any significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and four out of six studies did not find a significant difference in vasopressor requirement. The majority of studies did not show significant differences in urine output, brain relaxation, and length of stay between both groups. None found any difference in acid base status or electrolyte levels.\n\n\n\nGDFT, when compared to the conventional regime in neurosurgery, showed that the total volume of fluids administered was lesser in the GDFT group with no increase in serum lactate. There was no difference in the hemodynamics, urine output, brain relaxation, urine output, length of stay, and biochemical parameters.\n","PeriodicalId":38981,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in neurosurgical patients: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Chayanika Kutum, Prashant Lakhe, Niraj Ghimire, A. Bc, Uzma Begum, Karandeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/sni_412_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nPerioperative fluid management is critical in neurosurgery as over perfusion can lead to brain edema whereas under perfusion may lead to brain hypoperfusion or ischemia. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in patients undergoing intracranial surgeries.\\n\\n\\n\\nWe searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and forward-backward citations for studies published between database inception and February 22, 2024. Randomized controlled trials where intraoperative GDFT was performed in neurosurgery and compared to the conventional regime were included in the study. GDFT was compared with the conventional regime as per primary outcomes – total intraoperative fluid requirement, serum lactate, hemodynamics, brain relaxation, urine output, serum biochemistry, and secondary outcomes – intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. The quality of evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024518816).\\n\\n\\n\\nOf 75 records identified, eight were eligible, the majority of which had a low to moderate risk of overall bias. In four studies, more fluid was given in the control group. No difference in postoperative lactate values was noted in 50% of studies. In the remaining 50%, lactate was more in the control group. Three out of four studies did not find any significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and four out of six studies did not find a significant difference in vasopressor requirement. The majority of studies did not show significant differences in urine output, brain relaxation, and length of stay between both groups. None found any difference in acid base status or electrolyte levels.\\n\\n\\n\\nGDFT, when compared to the conventional regime in neurosurgery, showed that the total volume of fluids administered was lesser in the GDFT group with no increase in serum lactate. There was no difference in the hemodynamics, urine output, brain relaxation, urine output, length of stay, and biochemical parameters.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":38981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Neurology International\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Neurology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_412_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_412_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围手术期液体管理在神经外科手术中至关重要,因为过度灌注会导致脑水肿,而灌注不足则可能导致脑灌注不足或缺血。我们检索了MEDLINE、Cochrane和PubMed数据库,并向前向后引证了从数据库建立到2024年2月22日期间发表的研究。研究纳入了在神经外科术中实施 GDFT 并与传统方法进行比较的随机对照试验。GDFT与传统方法的比较主要结果为术中液体总需求量、血清乳酸、血液动力学、脑松弛、尿量、血清生化,次要结果为重症监护室和住院时间。证据质量采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估。本研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42024518816)上注册。在确定的 75 条记录中,有 8 条符合条件,其中大部分的总体偏倚风险为低至中度。在四项研究中,对照组给予了更多的液体。50%的研究未发现术后乳酸值有差异。在其余 50%的研究中,对照组的乳酸值更高。四项研究中有三项未发现术中低血压发生率有显著差异,六项研究中有四项未发现血管加压剂需求量有显著差异。大多数研究显示,两组患者的尿量、脑松弛程度和住院时间没有明显差异。GDFT 与神经外科的传统疗法相比,GDFT 组的输液总量较少,但血清乳酸没有增加。血液动力学、尿量、脑松弛、尿量、住院时间和生化指标均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in neurosurgical patients: A systematic review
Perioperative fluid management is critical in neurosurgery as over perfusion can lead to brain edema whereas under perfusion may lead to brain hypoperfusion or ischemia. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in patients undergoing intracranial surgeries. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases and forward-backward citations for studies published between database inception and February 22, 2024. Randomized controlled trials where intraoperative GDFT was performed in neurosurgery and compared to the conventional regime were included in the study. GDFT was compared with the conventional regime as per primary outcomes – total intraoperative fluid requirement, serum lactate, hemodynamics, brain relaxation, urine output, serum biochemistry, and secondary outcomes – intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. The quality of evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024518816). Of 75 records identified, eight were eligible, the majority of which had a low to moderate risk of overall bias. In four studies, more fluid was given in the control group. No difference in postoperative lactate values was noted in 50% of studies. In the remaining 50%, lactate was more in the control group. Three out of four studies did not find any significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, and four out of six studies did not find a significant difference in vasopressor requirement. The majority of studies did not show significant differences in urine output, brain relaxation, and length of stay between both groups. None found any difference in acid base status or electrolyte levels. GDFT, when compared to the conventional regime in neurosurgery, showed that the total volume of fluids administered was lesser in the GDFT group with no increase in serum lactate. There was no difference in the hemodynamics, urine output, brain relaxation, urine output, length of stay, and biochemical parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信