脊髓麻醉下行椎管内手术患者基于双光谱指数 (BIS) 和拉姆塞镇静量表 (RSS) 的右美托咪定剂量策略比较:前瞻性比较研究

Suna Kara Gormus, Tulay Cardakoz, Kamil Toker
{"title":"脊髓麻醉下行椎管内手术患者基于双光谱指数 (BIS) 和拉姆塞镇静量表 (RSS) 的右美托咪定剂量策略比较:前瞻性比较研究","authors":"Suna Kara Gormus, Tulay Cardakoz, Kamil Toker","doi":"10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives and Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dexmedetomidine infusion dosage adjustment strategies guided by BIS and RSS on total consumption in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anesthesia.Materials and Method: Eighty patients aged between 18-70 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II, who underwent orthopaedic, urological, and plastic surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients received spinal anesthesia in the lateral position through the L3-4 interval using a median approach. Following the observation of free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, spinal anesthesia was induced with 10 mg (2 ml of 5% hyperbaric bupivacaine) bupivacaine and 25 µg of intrathecal fentanyl. When the sensory block reached the T10 level, all patients were administered a dexmedetomidine loading dose of 1 µg/kg IV over 10 min for sedation, and the maintenance drug infusion dose was titrated to maintain BIS values between 60-80 in the first group and RSS at 3-4 in the second group. Throughout the surgery, hemodynamic variables (heart rate and blood pressure), respiratory parameters (respiratory rate), SpO2, sedation scores (BIS and RSS), and drug infusion doses and perioperative complications were recorded. Drug infusion was stopped 5 min before the end of surgery, and the duration of surgery, anesthesia, and total drug consumption were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Desired sedation was achieved by dexmedetomidine administration. A decrease in BIS values and an increase in RSS were observed with the loading dose. In both groups, the heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower at all measurement times than the control values. There was no significant difference in the mean blood pressure between groups B and R (p>0.05). The average blood pressure for B group was 92 ± 14.12 mmHg, while the average blood pressure for R group was 90 ± 12.73 mmHg. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of dexmedetomidine infusion doses required to achieve the desired sedation and total drug consumption 110 ± 20 (µg) in B group and 111 ± 22 µg in R group (p>0.05).Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine provides a targeted level of sedation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia without causing significant respiratory depression. Monitoring sedation depth using the BIS did not change the total drug consumption.","PeriodicalId":118668,"journal":{"name":"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of dexmedetomidine dosing strategies based on Bispectral Index (BIS) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anesthesia: A prospective comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Suna Kara Gormus, Tulay Cardakoz, Kamil Toker\",\"doi\":\"10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives and Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dexmedetomidine infusion dosage adjustment strategies guided by BIS and RSS on total consumption in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anesthesia.Materials and Method: Eighty patients aged between 18-70 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II, who underwent orthopaedic, urological, and plastic surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients received spinal anesthesia in the lateral position through the L3-4 interval using a median approach. Following the observation of free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, spinal anesthesia was induced with 10 mg (2 ml of 5% hyperbaric bupivacaine) bupivacaine and 25 µg of intrathecal fentanyl. When the sensory block reached the T10 level, all patients were administered a dexmedetomidine loading dose of 1 µg/kg IV over 10 min for sedation, and the maintenance drug infusion dose was titrated to maintain BIS values between 60-80 in the first group and RSS at 3-4 in the second group. Throughout the surgery, hemodynamic variables (heart rate and blood pressure), respiratory parameters (respiratory rate), SpO2, sedation scores (BIS and RSS), and drug infusion doses and perioperative complications were recorded. Drug infusion was stopped 5 min before the end of surgery, and the duration of surgery, anesthesia, and total drug consumption were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Desired sedation was achieved by dexmedetomidine administration. A decrease in BIS values and an increase in RSS were observed with the loading dose. In both groups, the heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower at all measurement times than the control values. There was no significant difference in the mean blood pressure between groups B and R (p>0.05). The average blood pressure for B group was 92 ± 14.12 mmHg, while the average blood pressure for R group was 90 ± 12.73 mmHg. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of dexmedetomidine infusion doses required to achieve the desired sedation and total drug consumption 110 ± 20 (µg) in B group and 111 ± 22 µg in R group (p>0.05).Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine provides a targeted level of sedation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia without causing significant respiratory depression. Monitoring sedation depth using the BIS did not change the total drug consumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和宗旨:本研究旨在评估 BIS 和 RSS 指导下的右美托咪定输注剂量调整策略对脊髓麻醉下行椎管内手术患者总消耗量的影响:纳入年龄在 18-70 岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会 (ASA) I 级和 II 级、在脊髓麻醉下接受骨科、泌尿科和整形外科手术的 80 名患者。患者在侧卧位通过 L3-4 椎间隙以正中入路接受脊髓麻醉。观察脑脊液是否畅通后,使用 10 毫克(2 毫升 5%高压布比卡因)布比卡因和 25 微克鞘内芬太尼诱导脊髓麻醉。当感觉阻滞达到T10水平时,所有患者均在10分钟内静脉注射1微克/千克右美托咪定进行镇静,维持药物输注剂量经滴定后,第一组患者的BIS值维持在60-80之间,第二组患者的RSS值维持在3-4之间。在整个手术过程中,记录血液动力学变量(心率和血压)、呼吸参数(呼吸频率)、SpO2、镇静评分(BIS 和 RSS)、药物输注剂量和围手术期并发症。手术结束前 5 分钟停止输液,记录手术时间、麻醉时间和药物总消耗量。进行统计分析,P 值小于 0.05 为有统计学意义:结果:使用右美托咪定可达到预期的镇静效果。服用负荷剂量后,观察到 BIS 值下降,RSS 增加。两组患者在所有测量时间的心率、收缩压和舒张压均明显低于对照组。B 组和 R 组的平均血压无明显差异(P>0.05)。B 组的平均血压为 92 ± 14.12 mmHg,而 R 组的平均血压为 90 ± 12.73 mmHg。两组在达到预期镇静效果所需的右美托咪定输注剂量和总用药量方面无统计学差异,B 组为 110 ± 20 (µg),R 组为 111 ± 22 µg (p>0.05):右美托咪定可为脊髓麻醉患者提供有针对性的镇静水平,且不会导致明显的呼吸抑制。使用 BIS 监测镇静深度不会改变药物总用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of dexmedetomidine dosing strategies based on Bispectral Index (BIS) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anesthesia: A prospective comparative study
Objectives and Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dexmedetomidine infusion dosage adjustment strategies guided by BIS and RSS on total consumption in patients undergoing infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anesthesia.Materials and Method: Eighty patients aged between 18-70 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II, who underwent orthopaedic, urological, and plastic surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients received spinal anesthesia in the lateral position through the L3-4 interval using a median approach. Following the observation of free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, spinal anesthesia was induced with 10 mg (2 ml of 5% hyperbaric bupivacaine) bupivacaine and 25 µg of intrathecal fentanyl. When the sensory block reached the T10 level, all patients were administered a dexmedetomidine loading dose of 1 µg/kg IV over 10 min for sedation, and the maintenance drug infusion dose was titrated to maintain BIS values between 60-80 in the first group and RSS at 3-4 in the second group. Throughout the surgery, hemodynamic variables (heart rate and blood pressure), respiratory parameters (respiratory rate), SpO2, sedation scores (BIS and RSS), and drug infusion doses and perioperative complications were recorded. Drug infusion was stopped 5 min before the end of surgery, and the duration of surgery, anesthesia, and total drug consumption were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Desired sedation was achieved by dexmedetomidine administration. A decrease in BIS values and an increase in RSS were observed with the loading dose. In both groups, the heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower at all measurement times than the control values. There was no significant difference in the mean blood pressure between groups B and R (p>0.05). The average blood pressure for B group was 92 ± 14.12 mmHg, while the average blood pressure for R group was 90 ± 12.73 mmHg. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of dexmedetomidine infusion doses required to achieve the desired sedation and total drug consumption 110 ± 20 (µg) in B group and 111 ± 22 µg in R group (p>0.05).Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine provides a targeted level of sedation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia without causing significant respiratory depression. Monitoring sedation depth using the BIS did not change the total drug consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信