脊髓麻醉泌尿外科手术患者围手术期并发症:前瞻性观察研究

Dilan Akyurt, H. Yazıcıoğlu, Candan Haytural, Berna Demir, A. Özgök
{"title":"脊髓麻醉泌尿外科手术患者围手术期并发症:前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Dilan Akyurt, H. Yazıcıoğlu, Candan Haytural, Berna Demir, A. Özgök","doi":"10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spinal anesthesia is widely used as the primary anesthesia method in urological surgeries, and this prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the associated complications.Materials and Method: Demographic data, procedures, and spinal anesthesia-related complications (e.g., hypotension, bradycardia, and headache) of patients who underwent urological surgery with spinal anesthesia were recorded perioperatively. Patients were questioned about complications on the 5th and 14th postoperative days.Results: Mean arterial pressure decreases in those administered intraoperative hyperbaric bupivacaine were higher at the 5th (p=0.010), 10th (p=0.003), and 15th minute (p=0.001) than in those administered levobupivacaine and lidocaine. In patients administered crystalloid and colloid solutions, an increase in hypotension was observed at the intraoperative 10th minute (systolic arterial pressure (SAP): p=0.008, diastolic arterial pressure (DAP): p=0.011) and 15th minute (SAP: p=0.017). Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) occurred on days 1 and 2 in 7 patients and resolved within 3 days. Two patients reported leg pain and one patient reported gluteal numbness with bupivacaine. A majority of the patients (83%) stated that they would prefer spinal anesthesia if they were to have surgery again.Conclusions: Identifying perioperative complications in urological surgeries performed under spinal anesthesia helps in effective management and has implications for clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":118668,"journal":{"name":"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative complications in patients undergoing urological surgery with spinal anesthesia: A prospective, observational study\",\"authors\":\"Dilan Akyurt, H. Yazıcıoğlu, Candan Haytural, Berna Demir, A. Özgök\",\"doi\":\"10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Spinal anesthesia is widely used as the primary anesthesia method in urological surgeries, and this prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the associated complications.Materials and Method: Demographic data, procedures, and spinal anesthesia-related complications (e.g., hypotension, bradycardia, and headache) of patients who underwent urological surgery with spinal anesthesia were recorded perioperatively. Patients were questioned about complications on the 5th and 14th postoperative days.Results: Mean arterial pressure decreases in those administered intraoperative hyperbaric bupivacaine were higher at the 5th (p=0.010), 10th (p=0.003), and 15th minute (p=0.001) than in those administered levobupivacaine and lidocaine. In patients administered crystalloid and colloid solutions, an increase in hypotension was observed at the intraoperative 10th minute (systolic arterial pressure (SAP): p=0.008, diastolic arterial pressure (DAP): p=0.011) and 15th minute (SAP: p=0.017). Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) occurred on days 1 and 2 in 7 patients and resolved within 3 days. Two patients reported leg pain and one patient reported gluteal numbness with bupivacaine. A majority of the patients (83%) stated that they would prefer spinal anesthesia if they were to have surgery again.Conclusions: Identifying perioperative complications in urological surgeries performed under spinal anesthesia helps in effective management and has implications for clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjpm.2024.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊髓麻醉是泌尿外科手术中广泛使用的主要麻醉方法:这项前瞻性观察研究旨在评估相关并发症:记录采用脊髓麻醉进行泌尿外科手术的患者围手术期的人口统计学数据、手术过程和脊髓麻醉相关并发症(如低血压、心动过缓和头痛)。在术后第 5 天和第 14 天对患者进行并发症询问:结果:术中使用高压布比卡因的患者在第 5 分钟(p=0.010)、第 10 分钟(p=0.003)和第 15 分钟(p=0.001)的平均动脉压下降率高于使用左布比卡因和利多卡因的患者。在使用晶体液和胶体溶液的患者中,术中第 10 分钟(收缩压(SAP):p=0.008,舒张压(DAP):p=0.011)和第 15 分钟(SAP:p=0.017)时观察到低血压增加。7名患者在第1天和第2天出现硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH),并在3天内缓解。两名患者报告腿部疼痛,一名患者报告使用布比卡因后臀部麻木。大多数患者(83%)表示,如果再次进行手术,他们会选择脊髓麻醉:结论:识别脊髓麻醉下泌尿外科手术的围手术期并发症有助于进行有效管理,对临床实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative complications in patients undergoing urological surgery with spinal anesthesia: A prospective, observational study
Background: Spinal anesthesia is widely used as the primary anesthesia method in urological surgeries, and this prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the associated complications.Materials and Method: Demographic data, procedures, and spinal anesthesia-related complications (e.g., hypotension, bradycardia, and headache) of patients who underwent urological surgery with spinal anesthesia were recorded perioperatively. Patients were questioned about complications on the 5th and 14th postoperative days.Results: Mean arterial pressure decreases in those administered intraoperative hyperbaric bupivacaine were higher at the 5th (p=0.010), 10th (p=0.003), and 15th minute (p=0.001) than in those administered levobupivacaine and lidocaine. In patients administered crystalloid and colloid solutions, an increase in hypotension was observed at the intraoperative 10th minute (systolic arterial pressure (SAP): p=0.008, diastolic arterial pressure (DAP): p=0.011) and 15th minute (SAP: p=0.017). Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) occurred on days 1 and 2 in 7 patients and resolved within 3 days. Two patients reported leg pain and one patient reported gluteal numbness with bupivacaine. A majority of the patients (83%) stated that they would prefer spinal anesthesia if they were to have surgery again.Conclusions: Identifying perioperative complications in urological surgeries performed under spinal anesthesia helps in effective management and has implications for clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信