康复中心实践中的成人生物伦理和教学法:神经伦理因素

L. Tomich, Nina Kravets, Olha Barladyn, Valentyn Grushko, Tetiana Biriukova, Halyna Leshchuk
{"title":"康复中心实践中的成人生物伦理和教学法:神经伦理因素","authors":"L. Tomich, Nina Kravets, Olha Barladyn, Valentyn Grushko, Tetiana Biriukova, Halyna Leshchuk","doi":"10.18662/brain/15.2/581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews the scientific research related to the appropriate use of partial deprivation of natural ethics for drug rehabilitation in a specialized centre. The article’s significance stems from the alarming increase in drug addiction, its widespread availability and the conflicting perspectives within the realms of andragogy, bioethics and neuroethics. The latter specifically pertains to the core of human identity. The article aims to synthesize scientific viewpoints on the problem in question, delineate the neuro- and bioethical realities within individual rehabilitation centres, contrast them with the multi-faceted ethical considerations and evaluate the usefulness of limiting certain natural rights of the client (denying sensory gratification) for therapeutic reasons. The authors of the article experienced limited access to information because of the extended, isolated nature of rehabilitation, in addition to ethical considerations. Therefore, the principal data collection methods included andragogical observations, monitoring of clients’ neurophysiological responses and conditions, examination of diaries maintained by centre staff, interviews with them and occasional questionnaires administered to clients. The analysis involved a neurophysiological interpretation of data without the use of specialized equipment, a summarization of questionnaire findings and an assessment of morally relevant phenomena to gauge their appropriateness and acceptability. The obtained results indicated that ethical considerations regarding interventions in the human body and psyche are indeed pertinent. Nevertheless, these decisions are frequently circumstantial, centring on the central ambition of the article: to alert rehabilitation professionals, medical personnel and legal authorities to the requirement for agreement between the violation of natural human rights and the essential human right to redemption, even in the more severe stages (III-IV) of addiction.","PeriodicalId":504804,"journal":{"name":"BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult Bioethics and Pedagogy in Rehabilitation Centre Practice: Neuroethical Factors\",\"authors\":\"L. Tomich, Nina Kravets, Olha Barladyn, Valentyn Grushko, Tetiana Biriukova, Halyna Leshchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.18662/brain/15.2/581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reviews the scientific research related to the appropriate use of partial deprivation of natural ethics for drug rehabilitation in a specialized centre. The article’s significance stems from the alarming increase in drug addiction, its widespread availability and the conflicting perspectives within the realms of andragogy, bioethics and neuroethics. The latter specifically pertains to the core of human identity. The article aims to synthesize scientific viewpoints on the problem in question, delineate the neuro- and bioethical realities within individual rehabilitation centres, contrast them with the multi-faceted ethical considerations and evaluate the usefulness of limiting certain natural rights of the client (denying sensory gratification) for therapeutic reasons. The authors of the article experienced limited access to information because of the extended, isolated nature of rehabilitation, in addition to ethical considerations. Therefore, the principal data collection methods included andragogical observations, monitoring of clients’ neurophysiological responses and conditions, examination of diaries maintained by centre staff, interviews with them and occasional questionnaires administered to clients. The analysis involved a neurophysiological interpretation of data without the use of specialized equipment, a summarization of questionnaire findings and an assessment of morally relevant phenomena to gauge their appropriateness and acceptability. The obtained results indicated that ethical considerations regarding interventions in the human body and psyche are indeed pertinent. Nevertheless, these decisions are frequently circumstantial, centring on the central ambition of the article: to alert rehabilitation professionals, medical personnel and legal authorities to the requirement for agreement between the violation of natural human rights and the essential human right to redemption, even in the more severe stages (III-IV) of addiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/15.2/581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/15.2/581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章回顾了与在专业中心适当使用部分剥夺自然伦理进行戒毒康复有关的科学研究。这篇文章的意义在于,吸毒上瘾人数的增长速度令人震惊,毒品泛滥成灾,而且在教育学、生物伦理学和神经伦理学领域存在着相互冲突的观点。后者具体涉及人类身份的核心。文章旨在综合有关这一问题的科学观点,描述个别康复中心的神经伦理和生物伦理现实,将其与多方面的伦理考虑进行对比,并评估出于治疗原因限制客户某些自然权利(拒绝感官满足)是否有用。除了伦理方面的考虑外,由于康复治疗的扩展性和孤立性,文章作者在获取信息方面受到了限制。因此,主要的数据收集方法包括:训导观察、监测客户的神经生理反应和状况、检查中心工作人员的日记、与他们面谈以及偶尔向客户发放问卷。分析工作包括在不使用专门设备的情况下对数据进行神经生理学解释、对问卷调查结果进行总结,以及对道德相关现象进行评估,以衡量其适当性和可接受性。研究结果表明,对人体和心理进行干预的伦理考虑确实是相关的。然而,这些决定往往是间接的,其核心是文章的中心目标:提醒康复专业人员、医务人员和法律当局注意,即使是在吸毒成瘾的较严重阶段(III-IV),也必须在侵犯自然人权和赎罪的基本人权之间达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adult Bioethics and Pedagogy in Rehabilitation Centre Practice: Neuroethical Factors
This article reviews the scientific research related to the appropriate use of partial deprivation of natural ethics for drug rehabilitation in a specialized centre. The article’s significance stems from the alarming increase in drug addiction, its widespread availability and the conflicting perspectives within the realms of andragogy, bioethics and neuroethics. The latter specifically pertains to the core of human identity. The article aims to synthesize scientific viewpoints on the problem in question, delineate the neuro- and bioethical realities within individual rehabilitation centres, contrast them with the multi-faceted ethical considerations and evaluate the usefulness of limiting certain natural rights of the client (denying sensory gratification) for therapeutic reasons. The authors of the article experienced limited access to information because of the extended, isolated nature of rehabilitation, in addition to ethical considerations. Therefore, the principal data collection methods included andragogical observations, monitoring of clients’ neurophysiological responses and conditions, examination of diaries maintained by centre staff, interviews with them and occasional questionnaires administered to clients. The analysis involved a neurophysiological interpretation of data without the use of specialized equipment, a summarization of questionnaire findings and an assessment of morally relevant phenomena to gauge their appropriateness and acceptability. The obtained results indicated that ethical considerations regarding interventions in the human body and psyche are indeed pertinent. Nevertheless, these decisions are frequently circumstantial, centring on the central ambition of the article: to alert rehabilitation professionals, medical personnel and legal authorities to the requirement for agreement between the violation of natural human rights and the essential human right to redemption, even in the more severe stages (III-IV) of addiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信