特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头的设计与水力性能研究

Tianyu Xu, Changjiang Lin, Qiuyue Yu, Ennan Zheng
{"title":"特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头的设计与水力性能研究","authors":"Tianyu Xu, Changjiang Lin, Qiuyue Yu, Ennan Zheng","doi":"10.1002/ird.2996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter is a novel type of drip irrigation emitter that allows one‐way fluid flow and sharp water flow diversion. Orthogonal test schemes were employed to analyse the impact of structural parameters and energy dissipation mechanisms on hydraulic performance. The effect of vortex partitioning in forward and reverse flow channels on hydraulic performance was analysed. A prediction model for the emitter discharge exponent (flow index) of the structural parameters was established. The results indicated that the emitter discharge exponents of forward‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (FTEs) ranged from 0.47 to 0.506, and those of reverse‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (RTEs) ranged from 0.51 to 0.533. There was a significant disparity in the distribution of vortex zones between the FTE and RTE. The local loss coefficients of the FTE were 2.12–10.84, and those of the RTE were 1.00–3.71. The channel width D had a substantial impact on the emitter discharge exponents of the FTE and RTE, whereas the inlet length of diverter K, the length of the bevelled edge of raindrop‐type diverter B and the opening angle of raindrop‐type diverter θ had relatively smaller effects on the emitter discharge exponent. The determination coefficients of the regression model for the FTE and RTE were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −4.57% to 1.21%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to −1.45% in the FTE. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −0.98% to 2.86%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to 1.45% in the RTE. These relative errors were all under 5%, indicating that the estimation of the emitter discharge exponent can be more accurate.","PeriodicalId":505999,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and Drainage","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The design and hydraulic performance studies of a Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter\",\"authors\":\"Tianyu Xu, Changjiang Lin, Qiuyue Yu, Ennan Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ird.2996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter is a novel type of drip irrigation emitter that allows one‐way fluid flow and sharp water flow diversion. Orthogonal test schemes were employed to analyse the impact of structural parameters and energy dissipation mechanisms on hydraulic performance. The effect of vortex partitioning in forward and reverse flow channels on hydraulic performance was analysed. A prediction model for the emitter discharge exponent (flow index) of the structural parameters was established. The results indicated that the emitter discharge exponents of forward‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (FTEs) ranged from 0.47 to 0.506, and those of reverse‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (RTEs) ranged from 0.51 to 0.533. There was a significant disparity in the distribution of vortex zones between the FTE and RTE. The local loss coefficients of the FTE were 2.12–10.84, and those of the RTE were 1.00–3.71. The channel width D had a substantial impact on the emitter discharge exponents of the FTE and RTE, whereas the inlet length of diverter K, the length of the bevelled edge of raindrop‐type diverter B and the opening angle of raindrop‐type diverter θ had relatively smaller effects on the emitter discharge exponent. The determination coefficients of the regression model for the FTE and RTE were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −4.57% to 1.21%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to −1.45% in the FTE. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −0.98% to 2.86%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to 1.45% in the RTE. These relative errors were all under 5%, indicating that the estimation of the emitter discharge exponent can be more accurate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and Drainage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头是一种新型滴灌喷头,可实现单向流体流动和水流急剧分流。采用正交试验方案分析了结构参数和消能机制对水力性能的影响。分析了正向和反向流道中涡流分区对水力性能的影响。建立了结构参数的喷射器排放指数(流量指数)预测模型。结果表明,正向特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头(FTE)的喷头排放指数在 0.47 至 0.506 之间,反向特斯拉阀式滴灌喷头(RTE)的喷头排放指数在 0.51 至 0.533 之间。FTE 和 RTE 的涡流区分布存在明显差异。FTE 的局部损失系数为 2.12-10.84,RTE 为 1.00-3.71。通道宽度 D 对 FTE 和 RTE 的喷射器排放指数有很大影响,而分流器入口长度 K、雨滴型分流器斜边长度 B 和雨滴型分流器开口角度 θ 对喷射器排放指数的影响相对较小。回归模型对 FTE 和 RTE 的判定系数分别为 0.89 和 0.84。在 FTE 中,模拟值与估计值的相对误差为 -4.57% 至 1.21%,实验值与估计值的相对误差为 -3.72% 至 -1.45% 。在 RTE 中,模拟值和估计值之间的相对误差为 -0.98% 至 2.86%,实验值和估计值之间的相对误差为 -3.72% 至 1.45%。这些相对误差都小于 5%,表明对发射器放电指数的估计可以更加准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The design and hydraulic performance studies of a Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter
The Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitter is a novel type of drip irrigation emitter that allows one‐way fluid flow and sharp water flow diversion. Orthogonal test schemes were employed to analyse the impact of structural parameters and energy dissipation mechanisms on hydraulic performance. The effect of vortex partitioning in forward and reverse flow channels on hydraulic performance was analysed. A prediction model for the emitter discharge exponent (flow index) of the structural parameters was established. The results indicated that the emitter discharge exponents of forward‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (FTEs) ranged from 0.47 to 0.506, and those of reverse‐Tesla valve‐type drip irrigation emitters (RTEs) ranged from 0.51 to 0.533. There was a significant disparity in the distribution of vortex zones between the FTE and RTE. The local loss coefficients of the FTE were 2.12–10.84, and those of the RTE were 1.00–3.71. The channel width D had a substantial impact on the emitter discharge exponents of the FTE and RTE, whereas the inlet length of diverter K, the length of the bevelled edge of raindrop‐type diverter B and the opening angle of raindrop‐type diverter θ had relatively smaller effects on the emitter discharge exponent. The determination coefficients of the regression model for the FTE and RTE were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −4.57% to 1.21%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to −1.45% in the FTE. The relative errors between the simulated and estimated values were −0.98% to 2.86%, and the experimental and estimated values were −3.72% to 1.45% in the RTE. These relative errors were all under 5%, indicating that the estimation of the emitter discharge exponent can be more accurate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信