如何测量适应性和创新性认知风格:改编 M. Kirton 教育问卷

Анастасия Андреева, Ольга Стерник, Татьяна Хавенсон
{"title":"如何测量适应性和创新性认知风格:改编 M. Kirton 教育问卷","authors":"Анастасия Андреева, Ольга Стерник, Татьяна Хавенсон","doi":"10.17323/vo-2024-16820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the research focus shifts from the technical to the human side of education, the relevance of measuring socio-psychological traits is growing. Despite proven validity and demand for the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, or KAI, in international and Russian studies, the scale has not previously been adapted for the Russian-speaking audience. The article describes the results of scale adaptation aimed at estimating the cognitive style of Russian teachers and school administrators. The proposed version of the translation considers the specifics of the Russian language and the context of the educational sphere, simultaneously being equivalent in meaning to the original scale. The readability check indicated that the question wordings fit the education level of the target audience. An iterative process of development and empirical testing of the psychometric properties (N1 = 137, N2 = 1236, N3 = 204) led to satisfactory scores for the three scales, items, and response categories. The analysis relies on the classical test theory and the IRT-RSM model. The final questionnaire includes 26 items and allows us to evaluate the three factors: «Originality and independence», «Thoroughness and self-organization», and «Inertia and request for instructions». Besides, the article demonstrates that the adapted version of the questionnaire does not show increased social desirability. The proposed tool is potentially useful for research and practical purposes to study the cognitive styles of teachers and school administrators, as well as groups close to them, including workers at other levels of education and the social sphere in general. The article provides a full version of the final methodology and practical recommendations for managing innovators and adaptors within an educational organization.","PeriodicalId":512224,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Measure Adaptive and Innovative Cognitive Styles: Adaptation of the M. Kirton Questionnaire for Education\",\"authors\":\"Анастасия Андреева, Ольга Стерник, Татьяна Хавенсон\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/vo-2024-16820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the research focus shifts from the technical to the human side of education, the relevance of measuring socio-psychological traits is growing. Despite proven validity and demand for the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, or KAI, in international and Russian studies, the scale has not previously been adapted for the Russian-speaking audience. The article describes the results of scale adaptation aimed at estimating the cognitive style of Russian teachers and school administrators. The proposed version of the translation considers the specifics of the Russian language and the context of the educational sphere, simultaneously being equivalent in meaning to the original scale. The readability check indicated that the question wordings fit the education level of the target audience. An iterative process of development and empirical testing of the psychometric properties (N1 = 137, N2 = 1236, N3 = 204) led to satisfactory scores for the three scales, items, and response categories. The analysis relies on the classical test theory and the IRT-RSM model. The final questionnaire includes 26 items and allows us to evaluate the three factors: «Originality and independence», «Thoroughness and self-organization», and «Inertia and request for instructions». Besides, the article demonstrates that the adapted version of the questionnaire does not show increased social desirability. The proposed tool is potentially useful for research and practical purposes to study the cognitive styles of teachers and school administrators, as well as groups close to them, including workers at other levels of education and the social sphere in general. The article provides a full version of the final methodology and practical recommendations for managing innovators and adaptors within an educational organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-16820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-16820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着研究重点从教育的技术层面转向人文层面,测量社会心理特征的相关性也在不断增强。尽管 Kirton 适应-创新量表(或 KAI)在国际和俄罗斯的研究中被证明是有效的,而且需求量也很大,但该量表以前从未针对俄语受众进行过改编。本文介绍了量表改编的结果,旨在估计俄罗斯教师和学校管理人员的认知风格。拟议的翻译版本考虑了俄语的特殊性和教育领域的背景,同时在意义上与原量表等同。可读性检查表明,问题的措辞符合目标受众的教育水平。通过对心理测量特性的反复开发和实证测试(N1 = 137,N2 = 1236,N3 = 204),三个量表、项目和反应类别都获得了令人满意的分数。分析依据的是经典测试理论和 IRT-RSM 模型。最终问卷包括 26 个项目,可以对三个因素进行评估:"独创性和独立性"、"彻底性和自我组织 "以及 "惰性和请求指导"。此外,文章还表明,改编版问卷的社会可取性并没有增加。所建议的工具对于研究和实际研究教师和学校管理者以及与他们关系密切的群体(包括其他教育层次的工作者和一般社会领域)的认知风格具有潜在的实用价值。文章提供了最终方法的完整版本,以及在教育组织内部管理创新者和适应者的实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Measure Adaptive and Innovative Cognitive Styles: Adaptation of the M. Kirton Questionnaire for Education
As the research focus shifts from the technical to the human side of education, the relevance of measuring socio-psychological traits is growing. Despite proven validity and demand for the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, or KAI, in international and Russian studies, the scale has not previously been adapted for the Russian-speaking audience. The article describes the results of scale adaptation aimed at estimating the cognitive style of Russian teachers and school administrators. The proposed version of the translation considers the specifics of the Russian language and the context of the educational sphere, simultaneously being equivalent in meaning to the original scale. The readability check indicated that the question wordings fit the education level of the target audience. An iterative process of development and empirical testing of the psychometric properties (N1 = 137, N2 = 1236, N3 = 204) led to satisfactory scores for the three scales, items, and response categories. The analysis relies on the classical test theory and the IRT-RSM model. The final questionnaire includes 26 items and allows us to evaluate the three factors: «Originality and independence», «Thoroughness and self-organization», and «Inertia and request for instructions». Besides, the article demonstrates that the adapted version of the questionnaire does not show increased social desirability. The proposed tool is potentially useful for research and practical purposes to study the cognitive styles of teachers and school administrators, as well as groups close to them, including workers at other levels of education and the social sphere in general. The article provides a full version of the final methodology and practical recommendations for managing innovators and adaptors within an educational organization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信