数字市场法》下的私人执行:重新审视权利与救济

Magnus Strand
{"title":"数字市场法》下的私人执行:重新审视权利与救济","authors":"Magnus Strand","doi":"10.36969/njel.v7i2.26219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is a new instrument of EU competition policy. It has been pointed out that although the DMA does not include any provisions on private enforcement, there should still be room for private enforcement of rights under the DMA. However, it has not been properly scrutinised to what extent the provisions of the DMA are suitable for such private enforcement. This article contributes to the literature by addressing this deficit and explaining the interwoven aspects of EU law and national law upon which private enforcement of the DMA will rely.\nThe analysis is carried out in two main tiers. First, the core substantive provisions of the DMA are analysed. It is concluded in this stage that there are some rules in the DMA which may trigger private law sanctions when breached. Second, the system of judicial protection of rights conferred on individuals under EU law is explained and applied to the DMA. In this regard, it is concluded that it would be appropriate to extend any private law remedies that are available to claimants who have been victims of an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU to claimants who have been victims of an infringement of protective provisions in the DMA.","PeriodicalId":489206,"journal":{"name":"Nordic journal of european law","volume":" 474","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Enforcement Under the Digital Markets Act: Rights and Remedies Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.36969/njel.v7i2.26219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is a new instrument of EU competition policy. It has been pointed out that although the DMA does not include any provisions on private enforcement, there should still be room for private enforcement of rights under the DMA. However, it has not been properly scrutinised to what extent the provisions of the DMA are suitable for such private enforcement. This article contributes to the literature by addressing this deficit and explaining the interwoven aspects of EU law and national law upon which private enforcement of the DMA will rely.\\nThe analysis is carried out in two main tiers. First, the core substantive provisions of the DMA are analysed. It is concluded in this stage that there are some rules in the DMA which may trigger private law sanctions when breached. Second, the system of judicial protection of rights conferred on individuals under EU law is explained and applied to the DMA. In this regard, it is concluded that it would be appropriate to extend any private law remedies that are available to claimants who have been victims of an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU to claimants who have been victims of an infringement of protective provisions in the DMA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic journal of european law\",\"volume\":\" 474\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic journal of european law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i2.26219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic journal of european law","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i2.26219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字市场法》(DMA)是欧盟竞争政策的新工具。有人指出,尽管《数字市场法》没有包含任何关于私人执行的条款,但仍应留有私人执行《数字市场法》所规定权利的空间。然而,《公平竞争法》的条款在多大程度上适合私人执行,这一点尚未得到适当审查。本文针对这一不足,解释了欧盟法律和国内法律中相互交织的方面,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。首先,分析了《危险物品管理法》的核心实质性条款。在这一阶段得出的结论是,DMA 中的一些规则在被违反时可能会触发私法制裁。其次,对欧盟法律赋予个人权利的司法保护制度进行解释,并将其应用于《残疾管理法》。在这方面,得出的结论是,将适用于因违反《欧盟运作条约》第 101 或 102 条而受害的索赔人的任何私法补救措施扩展到因违反《危险物品管理法》中的保护条款而受害的索赔人是适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private Enforcement Under the Digital Markets Act: Rights and Remedies Revisited
The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is a new instrument of EU competition policy. It has been pointed out that although the DMA does not include any provisions on private enforcement, there should still be room for private enforcement of rights under the DMA. However, it has not been properly scrutinised to what extent the provisions of the DMA are suitable for such private enforcement. This article contributes to the literature by addressing this deficit and explaining the interwoven aspects of EU law and national law upon which private enforcement of the DMA will rely. The analysis is carried out in two main tiers. First, the core substantive provisions of the DMA are analysed. It is concluded in this stage that there are some rules in the DMA which may trigger private law sanctions when breached. Second, the system of judicial protection of rights conferred on individuals under EU law is explained and applied to the DMA. In this regard, it is concluded that it would be appropriate to extend any private law remedies that are available to claimants who have been victims of an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU to claimants who have been victims of an infringement of protective provisions in the DMA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信