血管紧张素受体阻滞剂 (ARB) 与其他抗高血压药物对透析患者血压的影响:元分析

Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.25259/ijn_365_23
Karthika Devi D.S., J. J. F. Mary, Reena Mohan, Dominika Gavlasova, G. Kalaiselvan, E. Kathiravan, J. Foppiani, V. Saravanan, Archana Devi M., Samuel J. Lin
{"title":"血管紧张素受体阻滞剂 (ARB) 与其他抗高血压药物对透析患者血压的影响:元分析","authors":"Karthika Devi D.S., J. J. F. Mary, Reena Mohan, Dominika Gavlasova, G. Kalaiselvan, E. Kathiravan, J. Foppiani, V. Saravanan, Archana Devi M., Samuel J. Lin","doi":"10.25259/ijn_365_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nHypertension is an important factor driving mortality among dialysis patients. Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) has been effective similarly to angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEs) but with a low incidence of side effects.\n\n\n\nThe meta-analysis included all published studies that investigated the effect of ARB on the hypertension in adult dialysis patients (≥18 years). Data extraction was guided by a predetermined checklist. Data sources of the retrieved studies were PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Cochrane, Web of knowledge, and Google Scholar were systematically searched until February 2023. Using the RevMan 5 software, the mean difference for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) and the risk ratio (RR) of the adverse events (AEs) were pooled from the selected studies. The random-effects model was used to compare the difference in the pre-and post-dialysis of the SBP and DBP. Data analyses were performed from December 2022 to February 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction in SBP and DBP in dialysis hypertensive patients who were on anti-hypertensive agents, and the secondary outcome was assessment of AE associated with the drug after dialysis (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022355369).\n\n\n\nThe initial search yielded 1,679 records, of which 84 studies underwent full-text evaluation, which identified 13 studies and 1,462 patients. The pooled standard MD for losartan with other anti-hypertensive agents, where the pre-dialysis SBP was 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.21–0.55) and the post-dialysis was 0.35 (95% CI: −0.17–1.02); yet, both are statistically non-significant, implies that there was no difference between Losartan and ARB drugs regarding the effect on the SBP. Diastolic BP for predialysis was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.65–0.63) and post-dialysis was 0.03 (95% CI: −0.24−0.30) and statistically non-significant. AEs by the ARB agents were lower compared to other anti-antihypertensive agents (relative risk [RR]: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.59–1.75) and statistically non-significant.\n\n\n\nThis systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT demonstrated that ARB and other anti-hypertensive medications had similar impacts on the treatment of hypertension.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) versus Other Antihypertensive Medication on Blood Pressure in Patients on Dialysis: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Karthika Devi D.S., J. J. F. Mary, Reena Mohan, Dominika Gavlasova, G. Kalaiselvan, E. Kathiravan, J. Foppiani, V. Saravanan, Archana Devi M., Samuel J. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijn_365_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nHypertension is an important factor driving mortality among dialysis patients. Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) has been effective similarly to angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEs) but with a low incidence of side effects.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe meta-analysis included all published studies that investigated the effect of ARB on the hypertension in adult dialysis patients (≥18 years). Data extraction was guided by a predetermined checklist. Data sources of the retrieved studies were PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Cochrane, Web of knowledge, and Google Scholar were systematically searched until February 2023. Using the RevMan 5 software, the mean difference for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) and the risk ratio (RR) of the adverse events (AEs) were pooled from the selected studies. The random-effects model was used to compare the difference in the pre-and post-dialysis of the SBP and DBP. Data analyses were performed from December 2022 to February 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction in SBP and DBP in dialysis hypertensive patients who were on anti-hypertensive agents, and the secondary outcome was assessment of AE associated with the drug after dialysis (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022355369).\\n\\n\\n\\nThe initial search yielded 1,679 records, of which 84 studies underwent full-text evaluation, which identified 13 studies and 1,462 patients. The pooled standard MD for losartan with other anti-hypertensive agents, where the pre-dialysis SBP was 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.21–0.55) and the post-dialysis was 0.35 (95% CI: −0.17–1.02); yet, both are statistically non-significant, implies that there was no difference between Losartan and ARB drugs regarding the effect on the SBP. Diastolic BP for predialysis was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.65–0.63) and post-dialysis was 0.03 (95% CI: −0.24−0.30) and statistically non-significant. AEs by the ARB agents were lower compared to other anti-antihypertensive agents (relative risk [RR]: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.59–1.75) and statistically non-significant.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT demonstrated that ARB and other anti-hypertensive medications had similar impacts on the treatment of hypertension.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijn_365_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijn_365_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高血压是导致透析患者死亡的一个重要因素。血管紧张素-II受体阻滞剂(ARB)的疗效与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)相似,但副作用发生率较低。"荟萃分析 "纳入了所有已发表的研究,这些研究调查了ARB对成年透析患者(≥18岁)高血压的影响。数据提取以预先确定的核对表为指导。在 2023 年 2 月之前,系统检索了 PubMed、MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、SCOPUS、Cochrane、Web of knowledge 和 Google Scholar。使用 RevMan 5 软件对所选研究的收缩压和舒张压(SBP 和 DBP)的平均差和不良事件(AEs)的风险比(RR)进行汇总。采用随机效应模型比较透析前后收缩压和舒张压的差异。数据分析时间为 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 2 月。主要结果是服用抗高血压药物的透析高血压患者SBP和DBP的降低情况,次要结果是透析后与药物相关的AE评估(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022355369)。初始检索共获得1,679条记录,其中84项研究进行了全文评估,确定了13项研究和1,462名患者。洛沙坦与其他抗高血压药物的集合标准MD,透析前SBP为0.17(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.21-0.55),透析后为0.35(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.17-1.02);但两者在统计学上均不显着,这意味着洛沙坦与ARB药物对SBP的影响没有差异。透析前舒张压为-0.01(95% CI:-0.65-0.63),透析后舒张压为0.03(95% CI:-0.24-0.30),在统计学上不显著。与其他抗高血压药物相比,ARB药物的AEs较低(相对风险[RR]:1.01;95% CI:0.59-1.75),在统计学上无显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Impact of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) versus Other Antihypertensive Medication on Blood Pressure in Patients on Dialysis: A Meta-Analysis
Hypertension is an important factor driving mortality among dialysis patients. Angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) has been effective similarly to angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEs) but with a low incidence of side effects. The meta-analysis included all published studies that investigated the effect of ARB on the hypertension in adult dialysis patients (≥18 years). Data extraction was guided by a predetermined checklist. Data sources of the retrieved studies were PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Cochrane, Web of knowledge, and Google Scholar were systematically searched until February 2023. Using the RevMan 5 software, the mean difference for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) and the risk ratio (RR) of the adverse events (AEs) were pooled from the selected studies. The random-effects model was used to compare the difference in the pre-and post-dialysis of the SBP and DBP. Data analyses were performed from December 2022 to February 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction in SBP and DBP in dialysis hypertensive patients who were on anti-hypertensive agents, and the secondary outcome was assessment of AE associated with the drug after dialysis (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022355369). The initial search yielded 1,679 records, of which 84 studies underwent full-text evaluation, which identified 13 studies and 1,462 patients. The pooled standard MD for losartan with other anti-hypertensive agents, where the pre-dialysis SBP was 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.21–0.55) and the post-dialysis was 0.35 (95% CI: −0.17–1.02); yet, both are statistically non-significant, implies that there was no difference between Losartan and ARB drugs regarding the effect on the SBP. Diastolic BP for predialysis was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.65–0.63) and post-dialysis was 0.03 (95% CI: −0.24−0.30) and statistically non-significant. AEs by the ARB agents were lower compared to other anti-antihypertensive agents (relative risk [RR]: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.59–1.75) and statistically non-significant. This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT demonstrated that ARB and other anti-hypertensive medications had similar impacts on the treatment of hypertension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信