通过冠层覆盖率和冠层高度估算完全灌溉和缺水灌溉苜蓿的叶面积指数

Uriel Cholula, Manuel A. Andrade, Juan K. Q. Solomon
{"title":"通过冠层覆盖率和冠层高度估算完全灌溉和缺水灌溉苜蓿的叶面积指数","authors":"Uriel Cholula, Manuel A. Andrade, Juan K. Q. Solomon","doi":"10.3390/agriengineering6030123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In arid and semiarid regions, crop production has high irrigation water demands due to low precipitation. Efficient irrigation water management strategies can be developed using crop growth models to assess the effect of different irrigation management practices on crop productivity. The leaf area index (LAI) is an important growth parameter used in crop modeling. Measuring LAI requires specialized and expensive equipment not readily available for producers. Canopy cover (CC) and canopy height (CH) measurements, on the other hand, can be obtained with little effort using mobile devices and a ruler, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine the relationships between LAI, CC, and CH for fully and deficit-irrigated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). The LAI, CC, and CH measurements were obtained from an experiment conducted at the Valley Road Field Lab in Reno, Nevada, starting in the Fall of 2020. Three irrigation treatments were applied to two alfalfa varieties (Ladak II and Stratica): 100%, 80%, and 60% of full irrigation demands. Biweekly measurements of CC, CH, and LAI were collected during the growing seasons of 2021 and 2022. The dataset was randomly split into training and testing subsets. For the training subset, an exponential model and a simple linear regression (SLR) model were used to determine the individual relationship of CC and CH with LAI, respectively. Also, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model was implemented for the estimation of LAI with CC and CH as its predictors. The exponential model was fitted with a residual standard error (RSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97 and 0.86, respectively. A lower performance was obtained for the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.81). The MLR model (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) improved the performance achieved by the exponential and SLR models. The results of the testing indicated that the MLR performed better (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) than the exponential model (RSE = 0.97, R2 = 0.86) and the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.82) in the estimation of LAI. The relationships obtained can be useful to estimate LAI when CC, CH, or both predictors are available and assist with the validation of data generated by crop growth models.","PeriodicalId":505370,"journal":{"name":"AgriEngineering","volume":"115 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaf Area Index Estimation of Fully and Deficit Irrigated Alfalfa through Canopy Cover and Canopy Height\",\"authors\":\"Uriel Cholula, Manuel A. Andrade, Juan K. Q. Solomon\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/agriengineering6030123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In arid and semiarid regions, crop production has high irrigation water demands due to low precipitation. Efficient irrigation water management strategies can be developed using crop growth models to assess the effect of different irrigation management practices on crop productivity. The leaf area index (LAI) is an important growth parameter used in crop modeling. Measuring LAI requires specialized and expensive equipment not readily available for producers. Canopy cover (CC) and canopy height (CH) measurements, on the other hand, can be obtained with little effort using mobile devices and a ruler, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine the relationships between LAI, CC, and CH for fully and deficit-irrigated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). The LAI, CC, and CH measurements were obtained from an experiment conducted at the Valley Road Field Lab in Reno, Nevada, starting in the Fall of 2020. Three irrigation treatments were applied to two alfalfa varieties (Ladak II and Stratica): 100%, 80%, and 60% of full irrigation demands. Biweekly measurements of CC, CH, and LAI were collected during the growing seasons of 2021 and 2022. The dataset was randomly split into training and testing subsets. For the training subset, an exponential model and a simple linear regression (SLR) model were used to determine the individual relationship of CC and CH with LAI, respectively. Also, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model was implemented for the estimation of LAI with CC and CH as its predictors. The exponential model was fitted with a residual standard error (RSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97 and 0.86, respectively. A lower performance was obtained for the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.81). The MLR model (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) improved the performance achieved by the exponential and SLR models. The results of the testing indicated that the MLR performed better (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) than the exponential model (RSE = 0.97, R2 = 0.86) and the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.82) in the estimation of LAI. The relationships obtained can be useful to estimate LAI when CC, CH, or both predictors are available and assist with the validation of data generated by crop growth models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AgriEngineering\",\"volume\":\"115 36\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AgriEngineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在干旱和半干旱地区,由于降水量少,作物生产对灌溉水的需求量很大。可以利用作物生长模型来评估不同灌溉管理措施对作物产量的影响,从而制定高效的灌溉水管理策略。叶面积指数(LAI)是作物模型中使用的一个重要生长参数。测量叶面积指数需要昂贵的专业设备,生产者不易获得。而冠层覆盖度(CC)和冠层高度(CH)的测量则只需使用移动设备和一把尺子即可完成。本研究的目的是确定完全灌溉和缺水灌溉紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的 LAI、CC 和 CH 之间的关系。LAI、CC 和 CH 测量值来自 2020 年秋季在内华达州里诺市山谷路田间实验室进行的一项实验。对两个紫花苜蓿品种(Ladak II 和 Stratica)进行了三种灌溉处理:灌溉需求量分别为 100%、80% 和 60%。在 2021 年和 2022 年的生长季节,每两周对 CC、CH 和 LAI 进行一次测量。数据集随机分为训练子集和测试子集。在训练子集中,使用指数模型和简单线性回归(SLR)模型分别确定 CC 和 CH 与 LAI 的个体关系。此外,还采用了多元线性回归(MLR)模型来估计以 CC 和 CH 为预测因子的 LAI。拟合的指数模型的残差标准误差(RSE)和判定系数(R2)分别为 0.97 和 0.86。SLR 模型的性能较低(RSE = 1.03,R2 = 0.81)。MLR 模型(RSE = 0.82,R2 = 0.88)提高了指数模型和 SLR 模型的性能。测试结果表明,在估计 LAI 时,MLR 模型(RSE = 0.82,R2 = 0.88)优于指数模型(RSE = 0.97,R2 = 0.86)和 SLR 模型(RSE = 1.03,R2 = 0.82)。在有 CC、CH 或两种预测因子的情况下,所获得的关系可用于估计 LAI,并有助于验证作物生长模型生成的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leaf Area Index Estimation of Fully and Deficit Irrigated Alfalfa through Canopy Cover and Canopy Height
In arid and semiarid regions, crop production has high irrigation water demands due to low precipitation. Efficient irrigation water management strategies can be developed using crop growth models to assess the effect of different irrigation management practices on crop productivity. The leaf area index (LAI) is an important growth parameter used in crop modeling. Measuring LAI requires specialized and expensive equipment not readily available for producers. Canopy cover (CC) and canopy height (CH) measurements, on the other hand, can be obtained with little effort using mobile devices and a ruler, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine the relationships between LAI, CC, and CH for fully and deficit-irrigated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). The LAI, CC, and CH measurements were obtained from an experiment conducted at the Valley Road Field Lab in Reno, Nevada, starting in the Fall of 2020. Three irrigation treatments were applied to two alfalfa varieties (Ladak II and Stratica): 100%, 80%, and 60% of full irrigation demands. Biweekly measurements of CC, CH, and LAI were collected during the growing seasons of 2021 and 2022. The dataset was randomly split into training and testing subsets. For the training subset, an exponential model and a simple linear regression (SLR) model were used to determine the individual relationship of CC and CH with LAI, respectively. Also, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model was implemented for the estimation of LAI with CC and CH as its predictors. The exponential model was fitted with a residual standard error (RSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97 and 0.86, respectively. A lower performance was obtained for the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.81). The MLR model (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) improved the performance achieved by the exponential and SLR models. The results of the testing indicated that the MLR performed better (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) than the exponential model (RSE = 0.97, R2 = 0.86) and the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.82) in the estimation of LAI. The relationships obtained can be useful to estimate LAI when CC, CH, or both predictors are available and assist with the validation of data generated by crop growth models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信