阅读流畅性:对小学三、四、五年级学生进行的干预研究综述

Concilium Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.53660/clm-3746-24n19
Leisa Aparecida Gviasdecki De Oliveira, S. Conerado, Veronica Branco
{"title":"阅读流畅性:对小学三、四、五年级学生进行的干预研究综述","authors":"Leisa Aparecida Gviasdecki De Oliveira, S. Conerado, Veronica Branco","doi":"10.53660/clm-3746-24n19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to: 1. Present interventional studies related to reading fluency, carried out with students in the 3rd, 4th and 5th years of Elementary School; 2. Describe the number of participants, the intervention procedures, the number of sessions and the results found; 3. Analyze the effects of fluency interventions (speed, accuracy and prosody) to expand vocabulary and understanding. The research is quantitative and qualitative in nature, using a bibliographic technique. Three databases’ CAPES, LILAC and PubMed were accessed. It covered the period 2014 and 2024 combining three terms, using Boolean, which configured the following descriptors, in English: “Fluency” AND “Elementary School” AND “Intervention” and in Portuguese “Fluência” AND “Ensino Fundamental” AND “Intervention”. The conclusions presented in the 24 articles analyzed, which met the established criteria, pointed out that fluency interventions can be fundamental for increasing automated recognition, but the effects are not statistically significant for increasing vocabulary and comprehension. Furthermore, only one study analyzed prosody.","PeriodicalId":505714,"journal":{"name":"Concilium","volume":"115 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluency in reading: review of intervention studies carried out with students in the 3rd, 4th and 5th year of Elementary School\",\"authors\":\"Leisa Aparecida Gviasdecki De Oliveira, S. Conerado, Veronica Branco\",\"doi\":\"10.53660/clm-3746-24n19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aimed to: 1. Present interventional studies related to reading fluency, carried out with students in the 3rd, 4th and 5th years of Elementary School; 2. Describe the number of participants, the intervention procedures, the number of sessions and the results found; 3. Analyze the effects of fluency interventions (speed, accuracy and prosody) to expand vocabulary and understanding. The research is quantitative and qualitative in nature, using a bibliographic technique. Three databases’ CAPES, LILAC and PubMed were accessed. It covered the period 2014 and 2024 combining three terms, using Boolean, which configured the following descriptors, in English: “Fluency” AND “Elementary School” AND “Intervention” and in Portuguese “Fluência” AND “Ensino Fundamental” AND “Intervention”. The conclusions presented in the 24 articles analyzed, which met the established criteria, pointed out that fluency interventions can be fundamental for increasing automated recognition, but the effects are not statistically significant for increasing vocabulary and comprehension. Furthermore, only one study analyzed prosody.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concilium\",\"volume\":\"115 48\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concilium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53660/clm-3746-24n19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concilium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53660/clm-3746-24n19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在1.介绍对小学三、四、五年级学生进行的与阅读流畅性有关的干预研究;2.描述参与人数、干预程序、次数和结果;3.分析流畅性干预(速度、准确性和拟声)对扩大词汇量和理解力的影响。本研究采用书目技术进行定量和定性研究。访问了三个数据库:CAPES、LILAC 和 PubMed。研究时间跨度为 2014 年至 2024 年,结合三个术语,使用布尔法,用英语配置了以下描述符:"流利 "和 "小学 "和 "干预",葡萄牙语为 "Fluência "和 "Ensino Fundamental "和 "干预"。所分析的 24 篇符合既定标准的文章得出的结论指出,流利性干预对提高自动识别能力具有根本性的作用,但对提高词汇量和理解能力的效果在统计学上并不显著。此外,只有一项研究分析了拟声词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluency in reading: review of intervention studies carried out with students in the 3rd, 4th and 5th year of Elementary School
The present study aimed to: 1. Present interventional studies related to reading fluency, carried out with students in the 3rd, 4th and 5th years of Elementary School; 2. Describe the number of participants, the intervention procedures, the number of sessions and the results found; 3. Analyze the effects of fluency interventions (speed, accuracy and prosody) to expand vocabulary and understanding. The research is quantitative and qualitative in nature, using a bibliographic technique. Three databases’ CAPES, LILAC and PubMed were accessed. It covered the period 2014 and 2024 combining three terms, using Boolean, which configured the following descriptors, in English: “Fluency” AND “Elementary School” AND “Intervention” and in Portuguese “Fluência” AND “Ensino Fundamental” AND “Intervention”. The conclusions presented in the 24 articles analyzed, which met the established criteria, pointed out that fluency interventions can be fundamental for increasing automated recognition, but the effects are not statistically significant for increasing vocabulary and comprehension. Furthermore, only one study analyzed prosody.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信