黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤恶性肿瘤中的溶瘤病毒研究进展如何?

Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.3390/ph17070916
George Nassief, Angela Anaeme, Karen Moussa, David Chen, George Ansstas
{"title":"黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤恶性肿瘤中的溶瘤病毒研究进展如何?","authors":"George Nassief, Angela Anaeme, Karen Moussa, David Chen, George Ansstas","doi":"10.3390/ph17070916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skin cancer prognosis has greatly improved recently due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, many patients with advanced skin cancer still experience immunotherapy resistance and disease progression during ICI treatment, thus calling for novel therapeutics which address this treatment gap. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has gained popularity in recent years as a viable treatment option for patients with skin cancer. In preclinical studies, T-VEC demonstrated both a direct anti-tumor effect in injected lesions as well as a systemic immune-mediated effect in non-injected lesions, which could pose additional benefits when combined with ICI therapy. Following promising results from the OPTiM trial, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the usage of T-VEC as a single agent in advanced melanoma. However, the MASTERKEY-265 trial demonstrated that adding T-VEC to pembrolizumab did not offer additional clinical benefit in patients with melanoma. Nevertheless, the promising efficacy of T-VEC and its approval by the FDA helped oncolytic viruses (OVs) gain wide attention in cancer therapy, and extensive research has been undertaken to evaluate the usage of OVs in other tumors such as sarcomas and breast cancers. Here, we provide a review of clinical results from 2022 to 2024 that investigate the efficacy and safety of OVs as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in skin malignancies. Furthermore, we delineate the current limitations in OV utilization and outline future directions to enhance clinical outcomes for patients with skin malignancies receiving OV-based therapies.","PeriodicalId":509865,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Are We Now with Oncolytic Viruses in Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Malignancies?\",\"authors\":\"George Nassief, Angela Anaeme, Karen Moussa, David Chen, George Ansstas\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph17070916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Skin cancer prognosis has greatly improved recently due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, many patients with advanced skin cancer still experience immunotherapy resistance and disease progression during ICI treatment, thus calling for novel therapeutics which address this treatment gap. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has gained popularity in recent years as a viable treatment option for patients with skin cancer. In preclinical studies, T-VEC demonstrated both a direct anti-tumor effect in injected lesions as well as a systemic immune-mediated effect in non-injected lesions, which could pose additional benefits when combined with ICI therapy. Following promising results from the OPTiM trial, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the usage of T-VEC as a single agent in advanced melanoma. However, the MASTERKEY-265 trial demonstrated that adding T-VEC to pembrolizumab did not offer additional clinical benefit in patients with melanoma. Nevertheless, the promising efficacy of T-VEC and its approval by the FDA helped oncolytic viruses (OVs) gain wide attention in cancer therapy, and extensive research has been undertaken to evaluate the usage of OVs in other tumors such as sarcomas and breast cancers. Here, we provide a review of clinical results from 2022 to 2024 that investigate the efficacy and safety of OVs as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in skin malignancies. Furthermore, we delineate the current limitations in OV utilization and outline future directions to enhance clinical outcomes for patients with skin malignancies receiving OV-based therapies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,由于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的问世,皮肤癌的预后有了很大改善。然而,许多晚期皮肤癌患者在接受 ICI 治疗期间仍会出现免疫治疗耐药和疾病进展,因此需要新型疗法来弥补这一治疗空白。近年来,Talimogene laherparepvec(T-VEC)作为皮肤癌患者的一种可行治疗方案受到了广泛欢迎。在临床前研究中,T-VEC 在注射病灶中表现出直接抗肿瘤作用,在未注射病灶中也表现出全身免疫介导作用,与 ICI 治疗相结合可带来更多益处。在 OPTiM 试验取得良好效果后,美国食品药品管理局(FDA)批准将 T-VEC 作为单药用于晚期黑色素瘤的治疗。然而,MASTERKEY-265 试验表明,在 pembrolizumab 的基础上添加 T-VEC 并不能为黑色素瘤患者带来额外的临床获益。尽管如此,T-VEC良好的疗效以及美国食品药品管理局(FDA)对其的批准帮助溶瘤病毒(OVs)在癌症治疗中获得了广泛的关注,并开展了广泛的研究来评估OVs在肉瘤和乳腺癌等其他肿瘤中的应用。在此,我们回顾了 2022 年至 2024 年期间研究 OVs 作为单一疗法或与其他疗法联合治疗皮肤恶性肿瘤的有效性和安全性的临床结果。此外,我们还阐述了目前 OV 使用的局限性,并概述了未来的发展方向,以提高接受 OV 治疗的皮肤恶性肿瘤患者的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where Are We Now with Oncolytic Viruses in Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Malignancies?
Skin cancer prognosis has greatly improved recently due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, many patients with advanced skin cancer still experience immunotherapy resistance and disease progression during ICI treatment, thus calling for novel therapeutics which address this treatment gap. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has gained popularity in recent years as a viable treatment option for patients with skin cancer. In preclinical studies, T-VEC demonstrated both a direct anti-tumor effect in injected lesions as well as a systemic immune-mediated effect in non-injected lesions, which could pose additional benefits when combined with ICI therapy. Following promising results from the OPTiM trial, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the usage of T-VEC as a single agent in advanced melanoma. However, the MASTERKEY-265 trial demonstrated that adding T-VEC to pembrolizumab did not offer additional clinical benefit in patients with melanoma. Nevertheless, the promising efficacy of T-VEC and its approval by the FDA helped oncolytic viruses (OVs) gain wide attention in cancer therapy, and extensive research has been undertaken to evaluate the usage of OVs in other tumors such as sarcomas and breast cancers. Here, we provide a review of clinical results from 2022 to 2024 that investigate the efficacy and safety of OVs as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in skin malignancies. Furthermore, we delineate the current limitations in OV utilization and outline future directions to enhance clinical outcomes for patients with skin malignancies receiving OV-based therapies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信