Samarth Singh, M. Jadhav, Pretesh John, H. N. Bhargaw
{"title":"基于深度神经网络的 1D-CNN 模型和 LSTM 模型之间的比较分析,以利用形状记忆合金线致动器的自感应特性进行位置估计","authors":"Samarth Singh, M. Jadhav, Pretesh John, H. N. Bhargaw","doi":"10.1088/1361-665x/ad610c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article presents a performance based comparative analysis of popular deep neu- ral network(DNN) models such as 1D-CNN and LSTM for Shape Memory alloy(SMA)- based wire actuator position estimation. These DNN models utilize the self-sensing property(SSP) for position prediction of the SMA actuator. The phase dependent elec- trical resistivity of SMA wire act as SSP, where the electrical resistivity is in the form of resistance acts as inputs to the proposed models for precise estimation of current position of the SMA actuator. For effective position control of the actuator, an ac- curate sensor feedback is required, utilizing SSP results in the elimination of external position sensor. This will improve the overall system in terms of more compactness and reduced interface complexity. Coming to DNN models, 1-D CNN has been meagerly explored in the current literature landscape for self-sensing prediction of SMA actua- tors, these 1-D CNN models are becoming quite popular for time series prediction for various applications and are emerging as an alternative to LSTM models. In this paper, a novel implementation of a 1D-CNN model for SMA actuator position estimation has been done. A comparative analysis between 1D-CNN and LSTM has been done for prediction capability and inference speed based on performance measures such as Mean Square Error(MSE), Mean Absolute Error(MAE), sMAPE(symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error), data distribution and average inference speed. This comparison shows that 1D-CNN has matching performance with the LSTM model with respect to the prediction capability, however 1D-CNN offers faster inference speed. This analy- sis can be useful for choosing suitable DNN model for deployment in low computing platform such as micro-controller for SMA actuator based real time applications where time latency is a critical parameter.","PeriodicalId":506236,"journal":{"name":"Smart Materials and Structures","volume":"98 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis between deep neural network-based 1D-CNN and LSTM models to harness the self-sensing property of the Shape Memory Alloy wire actuator for position estimation\",\"authors\":\"Samarth Singh, M. Jadhav, Pretesh John, H. N. Bhargaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-665x/ad610c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The article presents a performance based comparative analysis of popular deep neu- ral network(DNN) models such as 1D-CNN and LSTM for Shape Memory alloy(SMA)- based wire actuator position estimation. These DNN models utilize the self-sensing property(SSP) for position prediction of the SMA actuator. The phase dependent elec- trical resistivity of SMA wire act as SSP, where the electrical resistivity is in the form of resistance acts as inputs to the proposed models for precise estimation of current position of the SMA actuator. For effective position control of the actuator, an ac- curate sensor feedback is required, utilizing SSP results in the elimination of external position sensor. This will improve the overall system in terms of more compactness and reduced interface complexity. Coming to DNN models, 1-D CNN has been meagerly explored in the current literature landscape for self-sensing prediction of SMA actua- tors, these 1-D CNN models are becoming quite popular for time series prediction for various applications and are emerging as an alternative to LSTM models. In this paper, a novel implementation of a 1D-CNN model for SMA actuator position estimation has been done. A comparative analysis between 1D-CNN and LSTM has been done for prediction capability and inference speed based on performance measures such as Mean Square Error(MSE), Mean Absolute Error(MAE), sMAPE(symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error), data distribution and average inference speed. This comparison shows that 1D-CNN has matching performance with the LSTM model with respect to the prediction capability, however 1D-CNN offers faster inference speed. This analy- sis can be useful for choosing suitable DNN model for deployment in low computing platform such as micro-controller for SMA actuator based real time applications where time latency is a critical parameter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"98 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ad610c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ad610c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文章对基于形状记忆合金(SMA)的线性致动器位置估算的流行深度神经网络(DNN)模型(如 1D-CNN 和 LSTM)进行了基于性能的比较分析。这些 DNN 模型利用自感应特性(SSP)来预测 SMA 执行器的位置。SMA 金属丝的电阻率与相位有关,可以作为 SSP,其中电阻率以电阻的形式作为建议模型的输入,用于精确估计 SMA 执行器的当前位置。要对致动器进行有效的位置控制,就需要一个有效的传感器反馈,而利用 SSP 则可以省去外部位置传感器。这将改善整个系统,使其更加紧凑,并降低接口的复杂性。至于 DNN 模型,在目前的文献中,1-D CNN 在用于 SMA 执行器自感应预测方面的研究还很少,但这些 1-D CNN 模型在各种应用的时间序列预测方面正变得相当流行,并正在成为 LSTM 模型的替代品。本文对用于 SMA 执行器位置估计的一维 CNN 模型进行了新颖的实现。根据平均平方误差(MSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、对称平均绝对百分比误差(sMAPE)、数据分布和平均推理速度等性能指标,对 1D-CNN 和 LSTM 的预测能力和推理速度进行了比较分析。比较结果表明,在预测能力方面,1D-CNN 与 LSTM 模型的性能相当,但 1D-CNN 的推理速度更快。这种分析方法有助于选择合适的 DNN 模型,以部署在微控制器等低计算平台上,用于基于 SMA 执行器的实时应用,因为在这些应用中,时间延迟是一个关键参数。
A comparative analysis between deep neural network-based 1D-CNN and LSTM models to harness the self-sensing property of the Shape Memory Alloy wire actuator for position estimation
The article presents a performance based comparative analysis of popular deep neu- ral network(DNN) models such as 1D-CNN and LSTM for Shape Memory alloy(SMA)- based wire actuator position estimation. These DNN models utilize the self-sensing property(SSP) for position prediction of the SMA actuator. The phase dependent elec- trical resistivity of SMA wire act as SSP, where the electrical resistivity is in the form of resistance acts as inputs to the proposed models for precise estimation of current position of the SMA actuator. For effective position control of the actuator, an ac- curate sensor feedback is required, utilizing SSP results in the elimination of external position sensor. This will improve the overall system in terms of more compactness and reduced interface complexity. Coming to DNN models, 1-D CNN has been meagerly explored in the current literature landscape for self-sensing prediction of SMA actua- tors, these 1-D CNN models are becoming quite popular for time series prediction for various applications and are emerging as an alternative to LSTM models. In this paper, a novel implementation of a 1D-CNN model for SMA actuator position estimation has been done. A comparative analysis between 1D-CNN and LSTM has been done for prediction capability and inference speed based on performance measures such as Mean Square Error(MSE), Mean Absolute Error(MAE), sMAPE(symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error), data distribution and average inference speed. This comparison shows that 1D-CNN has matching performance with the LSTM model with respect to the prediction capability, however 1D-CNN offers faster inference speed. This analy- sis can be useful for choosing suitable DNN model for deployment in low computing platform such as micro-controller for SMA actuator based real time applications where time latency is a critical parameter.