在超饱和气候模拟中,以全球气温升降为指标的区域降水量滞后现象证据不足

Jeremy Walton, C. Huntingford
{"title":"在超饱和气候模拟中,以全球气温升降为指标的区域降水量滞后现象证据不足","authors":"Jeremy Walton, C. Huntingford","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad60de","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Society has set the aim of stabilising climate at key temperature thresholds, such as global warming at or below 1.5°C or 2.0°C above preindustrial levels. However, greenhouse gas emissions are failing to decline, and if they continue on their current trajectory it is likely that such thresholds will be crossed in the decades ahead. Because of this risk, there is an emerging focus on overshoot, where, for a temporary period, global warming is allowed to cross critical thresholds to reach a peak value before decreasing to the desired limit. A key question about overshoots is whether there are hysteresis effects—that is, whether global or regional climate has properties that differ between the phase of global warming increase and the phase of decreasing. Here, we analyse temperature and precipitation data from five Earth System Models (ESMs) forced by the SSP5-3.4-OS CMIP6 overshoot scenario. We look at the level of precipitation during two periods of near-identical global warming: one whilst temperatures are rising, and the other when they are falling. For global means, we find a statistically significant difference between precipitation values during the two periods. This is an example of hysteresis, as the reversion to an earlier global warming state results in a level of global rainfall which is different from that observed when warming was increasing. Spatial disaggregation of rainfall differences between the two near-identical warming levels shows the largest differences in the tropical region, which are statistically significant for four of the five ESMs. When considering much smaller regions, including parts of the tropics, there remains some evidence of hysteresis. However, the differences are no longer statistically significant against a background of substantial interannual rainfall variability. We discuss the implications of our findings for climate impacts assesments.","PeriodicalId":507917,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Little Evidence of Hysteresis in Regional Precipitation, When Indexed by Global Temperature Rise and Fall in an Overshoot Climate Simulation\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Walton, C. Huntingford\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1748-9326/ad60de\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Society has set the aim of stabilising climate at key temperature thresholds, such as global warming at or below 1.5°C or 2.0°C above preindustrial levels. However, greenhouse gas emissions are failing to decline, and if they continue on their current trajectory it is likely that such thresholds will be crossed in the decades ahead. Because of this risk, there is an emerging focus on overshoot, where, for a temporary period, global warming is allowed to cross critical thresholds to reach a peak value before decreasing to the desired limit. A key question about overshoots is whether there are hysteresis effects—that is, whether global or regional climate has properties that differ between the phase of global warming increase and the phase of decreasing. Here, we analyse temperature and precipitation data from five Earth System Models (ESMs) forced by the SSP5-3.4-OS CMIP6 overshoot scenario. We look at the level of precipitation during two periods of near-identical global warming: one whilst temperatures are rising, and the other when they are falling. For global means, we find a statistically significant difference between precipitation values during the two periods. This is an example of hysteresis, as the reversion to an earlier global warming state results in a level of global rainfall which is different from that observed when warming was increasing. Spatial disaggregation of rainfall differences between the two near-identical warming levels shows the largest differences in the tropical region, which are statistically significant for four of the five ESMs. When considering much smaller regions, including parts of the tropics, there remains some evidence of hysteresis. However, the differences are no longer statistically significant against a background of substantial interannual rainfall variability. We discuss the implications of our findings for climate impacts assesments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad60de\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad60de","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会已经设定了将气候稳定在关键温度阈值上的目标,例如全球升温保持在或低于工业化前水平的 1.5°C 或 2.0°C。然而,温室气体排放量却没有下降,如果继续按照目前的轨迹发展,未来几十年很可能会跨过这些阈值。由于存在这种风险,人们开始关注超调问题,即允许全球变暖暂时跨过临界阈值,达到峰值,然后再下降到理想的极限。有关过冲的一个关键问题是是否存在滞后效应,即全球或区域气候在全球变暖上升阶段和下降阶段是否具有不同的特性。在此,我们分析了在 SSP5-3.4-OS CMIP6 过冲情景下五个地球系统模型(ESM)的温度和降水数据。我们研究了两个几乎相同的全球变暖时期的降水水平:一个是气温上升时期,另一个是气温下降时期。就全球平均值而言,我们发现这两个时期的降水量之间存在显著的统计学差异。这是滞后现象的一个例子,因为恢复到早期全球变暖状态所导致的全球降雨量水平与变暖加剧时所观测到的降雨量水平不同。对两个几乎相同的变暖水平之间的降雨量差异进行空间细分后发现,热带地区的差异最大,在五个 ESMs 中,有四个具有显著的统计学意义。如果考虑到更小的区域,包括部分热带地区,仍有一些滞后的证据。不过,在年际降雨量变化巨大的背景下,这些差异在统计意义上不再显著。我们将讨论我们的发现对气候影响评估的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Little Evidence of Hysteresis in Regional Precipitation, When Indexed by Global Temperature Rise and Fall in an Overshoot Climate Simulation
Society has set the aim of stabilising climate at key temperature thresholds, such as global warming at or below 1.5°C or 2.0°C above preindustrial levels. However, greenhouse gas emissions are failing to decline, and if they continue on their current trajectory it is likely that such thresholds will be crossed in the decades ahead. Because of this risk, there is an emerging focus on overshoot, where, for a temporary period, global warming is allowed to cross critical thresholds to reach a peak value before decreasing to the desired limit. A key question about overshoots is whether there are hysteresis effects—that is, whether global or regional climate has properties that differ between the phase of global warming increase and the phase of decreasing. Here, we analyse temperature and precipitation data from five Earth System Models (ESMs) forced by the SSP5-3.4-OS CMIP6 overshoot scenario. We look at the level of precipitation during two periods of near-identical global warming: one whilst temperatures are rising, and the other when they are falling. For global means, we find a statistically significant difference between precipitation values during the two periods. This is an example of hysteresis, as the reversion to an earlier global warming state results in a level of global rainfall which is different from that observed when warming was increasing. Spatial disaggregation of rainfall differences between the two near-identical warming levels shows the largest differences in the tropical region, which are statistically significant for four of the five ESMs. When considering much smaller regions, including parts of the tropics, there remains some evidence of hysteresis. However, the differences are no longer statistically significant against a background of substantial interannual rainfall variability. We discuss the implications of our findings for climate impacts assesments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信