寻找聊天机器人的语言指纹

Jonas Nygaard Blom, Alexandra Holsting, Jesper Tinggaard Svendsen
{"title":"寻找聊天机器人的语言指纹","authors":"Jonas Nygaard Blom, Alexandra Holsting, Jesper Tinggaard Svendsen","doi":"10.7146/nys.v1i65.145396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chatbots have recently entered the educational system, creating opportunities but also challenges. A particularly pressing issue is the lack of a fully reliable method to trace if a text is written by a chatbot. This means, on the one hand, that students might use chatbots to write assignments undetected, and on the other hand, that students might be suspected of using chatbots even when they have not done so. In this study, we contribute to current research on the linguistic characteristics of chatbots by examining whether it is possible to distinguish lingui-stically between texts written by Danish students and ChatGPT. The results show that, generally – but not in every individual case – there are differences in the writing styles of the students and the chatbot. However, at the same time, it is possible to obscure the chatbot’s linguistic fingerprint using supplementary prompts. This highlights the difficulty of tracing texts written by artificial intelligence. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of this for Danish educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":509280,"journal":{"name":"NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier","volume":"86 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In search of the chatbot’s linguistic fingerprint\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Nygaard Blom, Alexandra Holsting, Jesper Tinggaard Svendsen\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/nys.v1i65.145396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chatbots have recently entered the educational system, creating opportunities but also challenges. A particularly pressing issue is the lack of a fully reliable method to trace if a text is written by a chatbot. This means, on the one hand, that students might use chatbots to write assignments undetected, and on the other hand, that students might be suspected of using chatbots even when they have not done so. In this study, we contribute to current research on the linguistic characteristics of chatbots by examining whether it is possible to distinguish lingui-stically between texts written by Danish students and ChatGPT. The results show that, generally – but not in every individual case – there are differences in the writing styles of the students and the chatbot. However, at the same time, it is possible to obscure the chatbot’s linguistic fingerprint using supplementary prompts. This highlights the difficulty of tracing texts written by artificial intelligence. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of this for Danish educational institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier\",\"volume\":\"86 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i65.145396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i65.145396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聊天机器人最近进入了教育系统,既带来了机遇,也带来了挑战。一个尤为紧迫的问题是,目前还没有一种完全可靠的方法来追踪文本是否由聊天机器人撰写。这意味着,一方面,学生可能会使用聊天机器人写作业而不被发现;另一方面,即使学生没有使用聊天机器人,也可能会被怀疑使用了聊天机器人。在本研究中,我们通过研究是否可以从语言上区分丹麦学生和 ChatGPT 所写的文本,为当前有关聊天机器人语言特点的研究做出了贡献。研究结果表明,一般情况下,学生和聊天机器人的写作风格存在差异,但并非在每种情况下都如此。但同时,使用辅助提示也有可能掩盖聊天机器人的语言特征。这凸显了追踪人工智能文本的难度。最后,我们讨论了这对丹麦教育机构的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In search of the chatbot’s linguistic fingerprint
Chatbots have recently entered the educational system, creating opportunities but also challenges. A particularly pressing issue is the lack of a fully reliable method to trace if a text is written by a chatbot. This means, on the one hand, that students might use chatbots to write assignments undetected, and on the other hand, that students might be suspected of using chatbots even when they have not done so. In this study, we contribute to current research on the linguistic characteristics of chatbots by examining whether it is possible to distinguish lingui-stically between texts written by Danish students and ChatGPT. The results show that, generally – but not in every individual case – there are differences in the writing styles of the students and the chatbot. However, at the same time, it is possible to obscure the chatbot’s linguistic fingerprint using supplementary prompts. This highlights the difficulty of tracing texts written by artificial intelligence. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of this for Danish educational institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信