"无论如何都要看到结果":审核作为教育技术的社交媒体

Marie K. Heath, Daniel G. Krutka, Benjamin Gleason
{"title":"\"无论如何都要看到结果\":审核作为教育技术的社交媒体","authors":"Marie K. Heath, Daniel G. Krutka, Benjamin Gleason","doi":"10.1108/ils-12-2023-0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis paper aims to consider the role of social media platforms as educational technologies given growing evidence of harms to democracy, society and individuals, particularly through logics of efficiency, racism, misogyny and surveillance inextricably designed into the architectural and algorithmic bones of social media. The paper aims to uncover downsides and drawbacks of for-profit social media, as well as consider the discriminatory design embedded within its blueprints.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors used a method of a technological audit, framed through the lenses of technoskepticism and discriminatory design, to consider the unintended downsides and consequences of Twitter and Instagram.\n\nFindings\nThe authors provide evidence from a variety of sources to demonstrate that Instagram and Twitter’s intersection of technological design, systemic oppression, platform capitalism and algorithmic manipulation cause material harm to marginalized people and youth.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe authors contend that it is a conflict of professional ethics to treat social media as an educational technology that should be used by youth in educational settings. Thus, they suggest that future scholarship focus more on addressing methods of teaching about social media rather than teaching with social media.\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper concludes with recommendations for educators who might work alongside young people to learn about social media while taking informed social actions for more just technological futures.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper fulfills an identified need to challenge the direction of the field of social media and education research. It is of use to education scholars, practitioners and policy makers.\n","PeriodicalId":504986,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“See results anyway”: auditing social media as educational technology\",\"authors\":\"Marie K. Heath, Daniel G. Krutka, Benjamin Gleason\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ils-12-2023-0205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThis paper aims to consider the role of social media platforms as educational technologies given growing evidence of harms to democracy, society and individuals, particularly through logics of efficiency, racism, misogyny and surveillance inextricably designed into the architectural and algorithmic bones of social media. The paper aims to uncover downsides and drawbacks of for-profit social media, as well as consider the discriminatory design embedded within its blueprints.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors used a method of a technological audit, framed through the lenses of technoskepticism and discriminatory design, to consider the unintended downsides and consequences of Twitter and Instagram.\\n\\nFindings\\nThe authors provide evidence from a variety of sources to demonstrate that Instagram and Twitter’s intersection of technological design, systemic oppression, platform capitalism and algorithmic manipulation cause material harm to marginalized people and youth.\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe authors contend that it is a conflict of professional ethics to treat social media as an educational technology that should be used by youth in educational settings. Thus, they suggest that future scholarship focus more on addressing methods of teaching about social media rather than teaching with social media.\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe paper concludes with recommendations for educators who might work alongside young people to learn about social media while taking informed social actions for more just technological futures.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper fulfills an identified need to challenge the direction of the field of social media and education research. It is of use to education scholars, practitioners and policy makers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":504986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-12-2023-0205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-12-2023-0205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在考虑社交媒体平台作为教育技术的作用,因为有越来越多的证据表明,社交媒体平台对民主、社会和个人造成了伤害,特别是通过效率、种族主义、厌女症和监视等逻辑,这些都不可避免地设计在社交媒体的架构和算法中。本文旨在揭示营利性社交媒体的缺点和弊端,并思考其蓝图中蕴含的歧视性设计。作者采用技术审计的方法,从技术怀疑论和歧视性设计的角度出发,思考 Twitter 和 Instagram 意想不到的缺点和后果。研究结果作者从各种来源提供的证据表明,Instagram 和 Twitter 的技术设计、系统性压迫、平台资本主义和算法操纵等因素交织在一起,对边缘化人群和青少年造成了实质性伤害。研究局限/启示作者认为,将社交媒体作为一种教育技术来对待,并让青少年在教育环境中使用,是与职业道德相冲突的。因此,他们建议未来的学术研究应更多地关注有关社交媒体的教学方法,而不是使用社交媒体进行教学。本文最后为教育工作者提出了建议,他们可以与年轻人一起学习社交媒体,同时采取明智的社会行动,以实现更加公正的技术未来。它对教育学者、从业人员和政策制定者都有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“See results anyway”: auditing social media as educational technology
Purpose This paper aims to consider the role of social media platforms as educational technologies given growing evidence of harms to democracy, society and individuals, particularly through logics of efficiency, racism, misogyny and surveillance inextricably designed into the architectural and algorithmic bones of social media. The paper aims to uncover downsides and drawbacks of for-profit social media, as well as consider the discriminatory design embedded within its blueprints. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a method of a technological audit, framed through the lenses of technoskepticism and discriminatory design, to consider the unintended downsides and consequences of Twitter and Instagram. Findings The authors provide evidence from a variety of sources to demonstrate that Instagram and Twitter’s intersection of technological design, systemic oppression, platform capitalism and algorithmic manipulation cause material harm to marginalized people and youth. Research limitations/implications The authors contend that it is a conflict of professional ethics to treat social media as an educational technology that should be used by youth in educational settings. Thus, they suggest that future scholarship focus more on addressing methods of teaching about social media rather than teaching with social media. Practical implications The paper concludes with recommendations for educators who might work alongside young people to learn about social media while taking informed social actions for more just technological futures. Originality/value This paper fulfills an identified need to challenge the direction of the field of social media and education research. It is of use to education scholars, practitioners and policy makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信