David Nicholas, Jorge Revez, Abdullah Abrizah, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, David Clark, Jie Xu, Marzena Swigon, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Eti Herman
{"title":"购买和出版:早期职业研究人员和开放存取出版成本","authors":"David Nicholas, Jorge Revez, Abdullah Abrizah, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, David Clark, Jie Xu, Marzena Swigon, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Eti Herman","doi":"10.1002/leap.1617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper comes from the third stage (H-3) of the long-running <i>Harbingers of Change</i> project (2015), which has investigated the scholarly communication beliefs and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) for a decade. The first stage (H-1) focussed on generational (Millennial) change; the second (H-2) on the impact of COVID; and, currently, the third stage (H-3) on AI and its impact. While each stage has a particular focus all stages also asked questions about wider scholarly communications. This paper re-examines an important finding found in H-1 and backed by H-2, which was that ECRs thought article processing charges were a major barrier to publishing open access (OA). Since then, OA has become more complex with more models available and a huge body of OA journals to navigate, so it is time to return to the topic. Data were obtained from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal and Spain about national guidelines and practices with 62 ECRs interviewed in-depth. The findings indicate that ECRs are encountering challenges, or dilemmas in OA publishing. More precisely, they struggle with issues surrounding cost perceptions and understanding within the intricate academic publishing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs\",\"authors\":\"David Nicholas, Jorge Revez, Abdullah Abrizah, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, David Clark, Jie Xu, Marzena Swigon, Anthony Watkinson, Hamid R. Jamali, Eti Herman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.1617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper comes from the third stage (H-3) of the long-running <i>Harbingers of Change</i> project (2015), which has investigated the scholarly communication beliefs and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) for a decade. The first stage (H-1) focussed on generational (Millennial) change; the second (H-2) on the impact of COVID; and, currently, the third stage (H-3) on AI and its impact. While each stage has a particular focus all stages also asked questions about wider scholarly communications. This paper re-examines an important finding found in H-1 and backed by H-2, which was that ECRs thought article processing charges were a major barrier to publishing open access (OA). Since then, OA has become more complex with more models available and a huge body of OA journals to navigate, so it is time to return to the topic. Data were obtained from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal and Spain about national guidelines and practices with 62 ECRs interviewed in-depth. The findings indicate that ECRs are encountering challenges, or dilemmas in OA publishing. More precisely, they struggle with issues surrounding cost perceptions and understanding within the intricate academic publishing environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文来自长期项目 "变革先声"(Harbingers of Change,2015 年)的第三阶段(H-3),该项目对早期职业研究人员(ECRs)的学术交流理念和实践进行了长达十年的调查。第一阶段(H-1)侧重于代际(千禧)变化;第二阶段(H-2)侧重于 COVID 的影响;目前,第三阶段(H-3)侧重于人工智能及其影响。虽然每个阶段都有特定的重点,但所有阶段也都提出了有关更广泛学术交流的问题。本文重新审视了在 H-1 中发现并得到 H-2 支持的一个重要发现,即 ECR 认为文章处理费是出版开放存取(OA)的主要障碍。从那时起,开放式获取变得更加复杂,有更多的模式可供选择,也有大量的开放式获取期刊需要浏览,因此是时候回到这个话题上来了。我们从中国、法国、马来西亚、波兰、葡萄牙和西班牙获得了有关国家指导方针和实践的数据,并对 62 家 ECR 进行了深入访谈。调查结果表明,ECR 在 OA 出版方面遇到了挑战或困境。更确切地说,在错综复杂的学术出版环境中,他们在与成本观念和理解相关的问题上挣扎。
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs
This paper comes from the third stage (H-3) of the long-running Harbingers of Change project (2015), which has investigated the scholarly communication beliefs and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) for a decade. The first stage (H-1) focussed on generational (Millennial) change; the second (H-2) on the impact of COVID; and, currently, the third stage (H-3) on AI and its impact. While each stage has a particular focus all stages also asked questions about wider scholarly communications. This paper re-examines an important finding found in H-1 and backed by H-2, which was that ECRs thought article processing charges were a major barrier to publishing open access (OA). Since then, OA has become more complex with more models available and a huge body of OA journals to navigate, so it is time to return to the topic. Data were obtained from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal and Spain about national guidelines and practices with 62 ECRs interviewed in-depth. The findings indicate that ECRs are encountering challenges, or dilemmas in OA publishing. More precisely, they struggle with issues surrounding cost perceptions and understanding within the intricate academic publishing environment.