基于机器学习建立抗抑郁药疗效预测模型

Yiyao Liu, Huitong Ni, Teng Zhi, Ziqi Zhao, Xiaoxi Zeng, Ming Hu, Zhiang Wu
{"title":"基于机器学习建立抗抑郁药疗效预测模型","authors":"Yiyao Liu, Huitong Ni, Teng Zhi, Ziqi Zhao, Xiaoxi Zeng, Ming Hu, Zhiang Wu","doi":"10.54844/hd.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Establishing a model can accurately predict the depressive patient’s response to different drugs, thereby providing \npersonalized treatment plans to improve treatment outcomes. \nMethods: Depressive patients who have taken Paroxetine hydrochloride or Venlafaxine hydrochloride or Agomelatine at a \nhospital in Sichuan Province are the subjects. By analyzing their medical records, medication histories, and basic information, \nan predictive model is constructed to predict the efficacy of antidepressant medications based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting. \nResults: For the prediction model of Paroxetine hydrochloride, 52 variables selected by the model were used to construct an \nefficient predictive model. In the training set, the model achieved an AUC value of 0.6354 and a K-S value of 0.1944, indicating \ngood performance in correctly classifying positive and negative samples and distinguishing different predictive probability \nthresholds. In the validation set, the AUC was 0.6065, and K-S was 0.1847, confirming the model’s effectiveness on new data. \nCompared to actual clinical data, the efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride was approximately 61.9%. The model’s predictions \naligned well with real-world data, reinforcing its reliability and practicality. As for venlafaxine hydrochloride, the model achieved \nan AUC of 0.5745 and K-S of 0.149 on the training set, while the validation set showed an AUC of 0.5298 and K-S of 0.0597. \nThese results suggest that the model’s performance in predicting venlafaxine hydrochloride is mediocre. Comparing with \nclinical data, the efficacy of venlafaxine hydrochloride was approximately 68.9%, indicating a discrepancy between the model’s \npredictions and actual outcomes, possibly due to the uneven distribution of the training set samples. As for agomelatine, due \nto the insufficient number of agomelatine samples collected at the sample hospital (less than 200), an effective predictive model \ncould not be established. \nConclusion: In clinical practice, doctors can make more informed treatment decisions and achieve personalized antidepressant \ntherapy with the assistance of this model. \nKey words: predictive model, machine learning, antidepressant efficacy, depressive patients, clinical practice","PeriodicalId":430023,"journal":{"name":"Health Decision","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment of a predictive model for antidepressant efficacy based on machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Yiyao Liu, Huitong Ni, Teng Zhi, Ziqi Zhao, Xiaoxi Zeng, Ming Hu, Zhiang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.54844/hd.2024.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Establishing a model can accurately predict the depressive patient’s response to different drugs, thereby providing \\npersonalized treatment plans to improve treatment outcomes. \\nMethods: Depressive patients who have taken Paroxetine hydrochloride or Venlafaxine hydrochloride or Agomelatine at a \\nhospital in Sichuan Province are the subjects. By analyzing their medical records, medication histories, and basic information, \\nan predictive model is constructed to predict the efficacy of antidepressant medications based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting. \\nResults: For the prediction model of Paroxetine hydrochloride, 52 variables selected by the model were used to construct an \\nefficient predictive model. In the training set, the model achieved an AUC value of 0.6354 and a K-S value of 0.1944, indicating \\ngood performance in correctly classifying positive and negative samples and distinguishing different predictive probability \\nthresholds. In the validation set, the AUC was 0.6065, and K-S was 0.1847, confirming the model’s effectiveness on new data. \\nCompared to actual clinical data, the efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride was approximately 61.9%. The model’s predictions \\naligned well with real-world data, reinforcing its reliability and practicality. As for venlafaxine hydrochloride, the model achieved \\nan AUC of 0.5745 and K-S of 0.149 on the training set, while the validation set showed an AUC of 0.5298 and K-S of 0.0597. \\nThese results suggest that the model’s performance in predicting venlafaxine hydrochloride is mediocre. Comparing with \\nclinical data, the efficacy of venlafaxine hydrochloride was approximately 68.9%, indicating a discrepancy between the model’s \\npredictions and actual outcomes, possibly due to the uneven distribution of the training set samples. As for agomelatine, due \\nto the insufficient number of agomelatine samples collected at the sample hospital (less than 200), an effective predictive model \\ncould not be established. \\nConclusion: In clinical practice, doctors can make more informed treatment decisions and achieve personalized antidepressant \\ntherapy with the assistance of this model. \\nKey words: predictive model, machine learning, antidepressant efficacy, depressive patients, clinical practice\",\"PeriodicalId\":430023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Decision\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Decision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54844/hd.2024.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Decision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54844/hd.2024.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立一个模型可以准确预测抑郁症患者对不同药物的反应,从而提供个性化的治疗方案,提高治疗效果。方法:对服用过盐酸帕罗西汀或文拉法林的抑郁症患者进行分析:以四川省某医院服用过盐酸帕罗西汀或盐酸文拉法辛或阿戈美拉汀的抑郁症患者为研究对象。通过分析他们的病历、用药史和基本信息,构建一个基于极梯度提升技术的抗抑郁药物疗效预测模型。结果在盐酸帕罗西汀的预测模型中,利用模型选择的 52 个变量构建了一个高效的预测模型。在训练集中,该模型的 AUC 值为 0.6354,K-S 值为 0.1944,表明在正确分类阳性和阴性样本以及区分不同预测概率阈值方面表现良好。在验证集中,AUC 值为 0.6065,K-S 值为 0.1847,证实了该模型在新数据上的有效性。与实际临床数据相比,盐酸舍曲林的疗效约为 61.9%。该模型的预测结果与实际数据十分吻合,增强了其可靠性和实用性。至于盐酸文拉法辛,该模型在训练集上的AUC为0.5745,K-S为0.149,而在验证集上的AUC为0.5298,K-S为0.0597。这些结果表明,该模型在预测盐酸文拉法辛方面表现一般。与临床数据相比,盐酸文拉法辛的疗效约为 68.9%,这表明模型的预测结果与实际结果之间存在差异,这可能是由于训练集样本分布不均造成的。至于阿戈美拉汀,由于样本医院收集的阿戈美拉汀样本数量不足(不到 200 份),因此无法建立有效的预测模型。结论在临床实践中,医生可以借助该模型做出更明智的治疗决策,实现个性化抗抑郁治疗。关键词:预测模型、机器学习、抗抑郁药疗效、抑郁症患者、临床实践
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment of a predictive model for antidepressant efficacy based on machine learning
Objective: Establishing a model can accurately predict the depressive patient’s response to different drugs, thereby providing personalized treatment plans to improve treatment outcomes. Methods: Depressive patients who have taken Paroxetine hydrochloride or Venlafaxine hydrochloride or Agomelatine at a hospital in Sichuan Province are the subjects. By analyzing their medical records, medication histories, and basic information, an predictive model is constructed to predict the efficacy of antidepressant medications based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting. Results: For the prediction model of Paroxetine hydrochloride, 52 variables selected by the model were used to construct an efficient predictive model. In the training set, the model achieved an AUC value of 0.6354 and a K-S value of 0.1944, indicating good performance in correctly classifying positive and negative samples and distinguishing different predictive probability thresholds. In the validation set, the AUC was 0.6065, and K-S was 0.1847, confirming the model’s effectiveness on new data. Compared to actual clinical data, the efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride was approximately 61.9%. The model’s predictions aligned well with real-world data, reinforcing its reliability and practicality. As for venlafaxine hydrochloride, the model achieved an AUC of 0.5745 and K-S of 0.149 on the training set, while the validation set showed an AUC of 0.5298 and K-S of 0.0597. These results suggest that the model’s performance in predicting venlafaxine hydrochloride is mediocre. Comparing with clinical data, the efficacy of venlafaxine hydrochloride was approximately 68.9%, indicating a discrepancy between the model’s predictions and actual outcomes, possibly due to the uneven distribution of the training set samples. As for agomelatine, due to the insufficient number of agomelatine samples collected at the sample hospital (less than 200), an effective predictive model could not be established. Conclusion: In clinical practice, doctors can make more informed treatment decisions and achieve personalized antidepressant therapy with the assistance of this model. Key words: predictive model, machine learning, antidepressant efficacy, depressive patients, clinical practice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信