Federico Zilic de Arcos, A. Wimshurst, R. Willden, Grégory Pinon, Christopher Vogel
{"title":"关于叶片元素动量模型大推力修正的 CFD 研究","authors":"Federico Zilic de Arcos, A. Wimshurst, R. Willden, Grégory Pinon, Christopher Vogel","doi":"10.1002/we.2937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a reanalysis of four axial‐flow rotor simulation datasets to study the relationship between thrust and axial induction factor. We concentrate on high‐thrust conditions and study variations in induction factor and loads across the span of the different rotor blades. The datasets consist of three different axial‐flow rotors operating at different tip‐speed ratios and, for one dataset, also at different blockage ratios. The reanalysis shows differences between the blade‐resolved CFD results and a widespread empirical turbulent wake model (TWM) used within blade element momentum (BEM) turbine models. These differences result in BEM models underestimating thrust and especially power for axial‐flow rotors operating in high‐thrust regimes. The accuracy of BEM model predictions are improved substantially by correcting this empirical TWM, producing better agreement with blade‐resolved CFD simulations for thrust and torque across most of the span of the blades of the three rotors. Additionally, the paper highlights deficiencies in tiploss modelling in common BEM implementations and highlights the impact of blockage on the relationship between thrust and axial induction factors.","PeriodicalId":506912,"journal":{"name":"Wind Energy","volume":"77 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CFD Study on High‐Thrust Corrections for Blade Element Momentum Models\",\"authors\":\"Federico Zilic de Arcos, A. Wimshurst, R. Willden, Grégory Pinon, Christopher Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/we.2937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a reanalysis of four axial‐flow rotor simulation datasets to study the relationship between thrust and axial induction factor. We concentrate on high‐thrust conditions and study variations in induction factor and loads across the span of the different rotor blades. The datasets consist of three different axial‐flow rotors operating at different tip‐speed ratios and, for one dataset, also at different blockage ratios. The reanalysis shows differences between the blade‐resolved CFD results and a widespread empirical turbulent wake model (TWM) used within blade element momentum (BEM) turbine models. These differences result in BEM models underestimating thrust and especially power for axial‐flow rotors operating in high‐thrust regimes. The accuracy of BEM model predictions are improved substantially by correcting this empirical TWM, producing better agreement with blade‐resolved CFD simulations for thrust and torque across most of the span of the blades of the three rotors. Additionally, the paper highlights deficiencies in tiploss modelling in common BEM implementations and highlights the impact of blockage on the relationship between thrust and axial induction factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wind Energy\",\"volume\":\"77 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wind Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文重新分析了四个轴流转子模拟数据集,以研究推力与轴向感应因数之间的关系。我们集中研究了高推力条件,并研究了不同转子叶片跨度上感应因数和负载的变化。数据集包括在不同叶尖速度比下运行的三个不同轴流转子,其中一个数据集还包括在不同阻塞比下运行的三个不同轴流转子。重新分析表明,叶片解析 CFD 结果与叶片元素动量(BEM)涡轮机模型中广泛使用的经验湍流尾流模型(TWM)之间存在差异。这些差异导致 BEM 模型低估了推力,尤其是在高推力状态下运行的轴流式转子的功率。通过修正这种经验性 TWM,BEM 模型预测的准确性大幅提高,在三个转子叶片的大部分跨度上与叶片解析 CFD 模拟的推力和扭矩更加一致。此外,论文还强调了常见 BEM 实现中叶尖损失建模的缺陷,并突出了阻塞对推力和轴向感应系数之间关系的影响。
A CFD Study on High‐Thrust Corrections for Blade Element Momentum Models
This paper presents a reanalysis of four axial‐flow rotor simulation datasets to study the relationship between thrust and axial induction factor. We concentrate on high‐thrust conditions and study variations in induction factor and loads across the span of the different rotor blades. The datasets consist of three different axial‐flow rotors operating at different tip‐speed ratios and, for one dataset, also at different blockage ratios. The reanalysis shows differences between the blade‐resolved CFD results and a widespread empirical turbulent wake model (TWM) used within blade element momentum (BEM) turbine models. These differences result in BEM models underestimating thrust and especially power for axial‐flow rotors operating in high‐thrust regimes. The accuracy of BEM model predictions are improved substantially by correcting this empirical TWM, producing better agreement with blade‐resolved CFD simulations for thrust and torque across most of the span of the blades of the three rotors. Additionally, the paper highlights deficiencies in tiploss modelling in common BEM implementations and highlights the impact of blockage on the relationship between thrust and axial induction factors.