Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au 晶硅器件中生长方法和基底诱导晶体质量的重要性

I. Angervo, A. Antola, Tuomas Vaimala, Anu Malmi, A. Schulman, H. Huhtinen, P. Paturi
{"title":"Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au 晶硅器件中生长方法和基底诱导晶体质量的重要性","authors":"I. Angervo, A. Antola, Tuomas Vaimala, Anu Malmi, A. Schulman, H. Huhtinen, P. Paturi","doi":"10.1088/1361-6463/ad6271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We report on the impact of the growth method and substrate-induced crystalline quality on the performance of planar Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au memristor devices. Structural, magnetic, and resistive properties were thoroughly examined for fundamental characterizations, with a particular emphasis on their correlation with the memristive properties of fabricated devices. Our findings suggest that memristor structures grown on single crystal SrTiO3 substrates using pulsed laser deposition consistently exhibit superior crystalline quality compared to those fabricated using chemical solution deposition and on silicon-based substrates. Despite variations in growth method and substrate, all memristor structures display typical resistive switching behaviour, distinguishing between high-resistance and low-resistance states. However, endurance and retention measurements demonstrate that memristor structures produced via pulsed laser deposition on single crystalline SrTiO3 demonstrate the most favourable resistive switching properties. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in resistive switching behavior across substrates and deposition methods, we extensively discuss these issues in the context of structural distortion and conduction mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":507822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of growth method and substrate-induced crystalline quality in Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au memristor devices\",\"authors\":\"I. Angervo, A. Antola, Tuomas Vaimala, Anu Malmi, A. Schulman, H. Huhtinen, P. Paturi\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6463/ad6271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We report on the impact of the growth method and substrate-induced crystalline quality on the performance of planar Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au memristor devices. Structural, magnetic, and resistive properties were thoroughly examined for fundamental characterizations, with a particular emphasis on their correlation with the memristive properties of fabricated devices. Our findings suggest that memristor structures grown on single crystal SrTiO3 substrates using pulsed laser deposition consistently exhibit superior crystalline quality compared to those fabricated using chemical solution deposition and on silicon-based substrates. Despite variations in growth method and substrate, all memristor structures display typical resistive switching behaviour, distinguishing between high-resistance and low-resistance states. However, endurance and retention measurements demonstrate that memristor structures produced via pulsed laser deposition on single crystalline SrTiO3 demonstrate the most favourable resistive switching properties. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in resistive switching behavior across substrates and deposition methods, we extensively discuss these issues in the context of structural distortion and conduction mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad6271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad6271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们报告了生长方法和基底诱导结晶质量对平面 Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au Memristor 器件性能的影响。我们深入研究了结构、磁性和电阻特性的基本特征,并特别强调了它们与所制造器件的忆阻特性之间的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,与使用化学溶液沉积法和在硅基衬底上制造的忆阻器相比,使用脉冲激光沉积法在单晶 SrTiO3 衬底上生长的忆阻器结构始终表现出优异的结晶质量。尽管生长方法和基底不同,但所有忆阻器结构都显示出典型的电阻开关行为,并能区分高电阻和低电阻状态。不过,耐久性和保持力测量结果表明,通过脉冲激光沉积在单晶钛酸锶(SrTiO3)上产生的忆阻器结构具有最有利的电阻开关特性。为了阐明不同基底和沉积方法的电阻开关行为差异的内在机制,我们结合结构变形和传导机制对这些问题进行了广泛讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importance of growth method and substrate-induced crystalline quality in Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au memristor devices
We report on the impact of the growth method and substrate-induced crystalline quality on the performance of planar Al/Gd0.2Ca0.8MnO3/Au memristor devices. Structural, magnetic, and resistive properties were thoroughly examined for fundamental characterizations, with a particular emphasis on their correlation with the memristive properties of fabricated devices. Our findings suggest that memristor structures grown on single crystal SrTiO3 substrates using pulsed laser deposition consistently exhibit superior crystalline quality compared to those fabricated using chemical solution deposition and on silicon-based substrates. Despite variations in growth method and substrate, all memristor structures display typical resistive switching behaviour, distinguishing between high-resistance and low-resistance states. However, endurance and retention measurements demonstrate that memristor structures produced via pulsed laser deposition on single crystalline SrTiO3 demonstrate the most favourable resistive switching properties. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in resistive switching behavior across substrates and deposition methods, we extensively discuss these issues in the context of structural distortion and conduction mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信