卡瓦略变换:预测领域的稳健性分析

Frank Heilig, Gina Holton, Edward J. Lusk
{"title":"卡瓦略变换:预测领域的稳健性分析","authors":"Frank Heilig, Gina Holton, Edward J. Lusk","doi":"10.22158/jetr.v5n2p86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Transformations of Panel-data values are routinely made for qualifying datasets with the intention of enhancing the quality of the decision-making-intel that may be gleaned from inferential-testing. Interestingly, there seems to be a “Spill-Over” of this “Conditional Data-Transformation Imperative” that impacts the development and execution of forecasting-protocols.Focus We offer inferential-tests of Transformations applied to randomly selected S&P500 Firm-datasets to address the following research Questions of Interest:(1) Is there Transformation-Jeopardy if the wrong Box-Cox-Carvalho-Transformations are selected re: (a) The Capture Rate Profiles for the 95% Forecasting Prediction Internals Or (b) The Relative Absolute Forecasting Error [RAFE] for the Forecasting Predictions?(2) In a consulting context, when Transformations are correctly used, the client almost always requires that the forecasts be re-transformed to the original measure of the data. Is there a Re-Transformation-Jeopardy re: the forecasting decision-intel needed to inform the decision-making processes of the client?Results We found that the theoretical expectations for the 95% Forecasting Prediction Intervals were founded even if the transforms were not to have been correctly selected. However, if the wrong transformation was to have been selected, non-trivial RAFEs are the likely result. Finally, if the correct transformation was to have been selected, re-Transformations to the original data-measures likely will inform the decision-making processes.","PeriodicalId":292161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Technology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carvalho-Transformations: A Robustness Analysis in the Forecasting Domain\",\"authors\":\"Frank Heilig, Gina Holton, Edward J. Lusk\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/jetr.v5n2p86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context Transformations of Panel-data values are routinely made for qualifying datasets with the intention of enhancing the quality of the decision-making-intel that may be gleaned from inferential-testing. Interestingly, there seems to be a “Spill-Over” of this “Conditional Data-Transformation Imperative” that impacts the development and execution of forecasting-protocols.Focus We offer inferential-tests of Transformations applied to randomly selected S&P500 Firm-datasets to address the following research Questions of Interest:(1) Is there Transformation-Jeopardy if the wrong Box-Cox-Carvalho-Transformations are selected re: (a) The Capture Rate Profiles for the 95% Forecasting Prediction Internals Or (b) The Relative Absolute Forecasting Error [RAFE] for the Forecasting Predictions?(2) In a consulting context, when Transformations are correctly used, the client almost always requires that the forecasts be re-transformed to the original measure of the data. Is there a Re-Transformation-Jeopardy re: the forecasting decision-intel needed to inform the decision-making processes of the client?Results We found that the theoretical expectations for the 95% Forecasting Prediction Intervals were founded even if the transforms were not to have been correctly selected. However, if the wrong transformation was to have been selected, non-trivial RAFEs are the likely result. Finally, if the correct transformation was to have been selected, re-Transformations to the original data-measures likely will inform the decision-making processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics and Technology Research\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics and Technology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/jetr.v5n2p86\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jetr.v5n2p86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高从推论测试中获得的决策信息的质量,通常会对面板数据值进行上下文转换。有趣的是,这种 "条件数据转换要求 "似乎对预测方案的开发和执行产生了 "溢出效应"。重点 我们对随机选取的 S&P500 公司数据集的转换进行推理测试,以解决以下感兴趣的研究问题:(1) 如果选择了错误的 Box-Cox-Carvalho 转换,在以下方面是否存在转换危险:(a) 95% 预测预测内部的捕获率曲线或 (b) 预测预测的相对绝对预测误差 [RAFE]?(2) 在咨询中,当正确使用转换时,客户几乎总是要求将预测重新转换为数据的原始量度。结果 我们发现,即使没有正确选择变换,95% 预测预测区间的理论预期也是成立的。但是,如果选择了错误的转换,则可能会产生非小的 RAFE。最后,如果选择了正确的转换,对原始数据措施的重新转换可能会为决策过程提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carvalho-Transformations: A Robustness Analysis in the Forecasting Domain
Context Transformations of Panel-data values are routinely made for qualifying datasets with the intention of enhancing the quality of the decision-making-intel that may be gleaned from inferential-testing. Interestingly, there seems to be a “Spill-Over” of this “Conditional Data-Transformation Imperative” that impacts the development and execution of forecasting-protocols.Focus We offer inferential-tests of Transformations applied to randomly selected S&P500 Firm-datasets to address the following research Questions of Interest:(1) Is there Transformation-Jeopardy if the wrong Box-Cox-Carvalho-Transformations are selected re: (a) The Capture Rate Profiles for the 95% Forecasting Prediction Internals Or (b) The Relative Absolute Forecasting Error [RAFE] for the Forecasting Predictions?(2) In a consulting context, when Transformations are correctly used, the client almost always requires that the forecasts be re-transformed to the original measure of the data. Is there a Re-Transformation-Jeopardy re: the forecasting decision-intel needed to inform the decision-making processes of the client?Results We found that the theoretical expectations for the 95% Forecasting Prediction Intervals were founded even if the transforms were not to have been correctly selected. However, if the wrong transformation was to have been selected, non-trivial RAFEs are the likely result. Finally, if the correct transformation was to have been selected, re-Transformations to the original data-measures likely will inform the decision-making processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信