严谨性和客观性是埃万德罗-阿加齐物理学理性的基础

Sophía Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.17163/soph.n37.2024.01
Linda Marcela Rivera Guerrero, Arjuna Gabriel Castellanos Muñoz, Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas
{"title":"严谨性和客观性是埃万德罗-阿加齐物理学理性的基础","authors":"Linda Marcela Rivera Guerrero, Arjuna Gabriel Castellanos Muñoz, Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas","doi":"10.17163/soph.n37.2024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In current epistemology, there are two opposing attitudes towards the empirical sciences. Onthe one hand, they appear as an essential tool for the advancement of knowledge. On the otherhand, there is doubt about the metaphysical and epistemological bases of this confidence inscientific knowledge, which has led science down paths of skepticism and pragmatism. This paper aims to contribute philosophically to the rationality and ontological status of physics, taking as a starting point some works of the philosopher of science Evandro Agazzi. The article presented hereintroduces Agazzi’s thought and the core issues of his epistemology. It then defines the concepts of rigor and objectivity as understood by Agazzi, and finally establishes criteria of rigor and objectivity for physics, showing how they are verified in two classical experiments. Based on these ideas, it is shown that physics, as the science it is, has criteria of rigor and objectivity that allow it to effectively reach the real, thus responding to the formalist and pragmatist challenge. Thus, the article does notexhaust itself in a description of Agazzi’s thought, but will apply his ideas to the concrete field of physics, making explicit ideas that have not been sufficiently made explicit by the Italian philosopher.","PeriodicalId":236657,"journal":{"name":"Sophía","volume":"25 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rigor and objectivity as foundations of the rationality of physics in Evandro Agazzi\",\"authors\":\"Linda Marcela Rivera Guerrero, Arjuna Gabriel Castellanos Muñoz, Carlos Andrés Gómez Rodas\",\"doi\":\"10.17163/soph.n37.2024.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In current epistemology, there are two opposing attitudes towards the empirical sciences. Onthe one hand, they appear as an essential tool for the advancement of knowledge. On the otherhand, there is doubt about the metaphysical and epistemological bases of this confidence inscientific knowledge, which has led science down paths of skepticism and pragmatism. This paper aims to contribute philosophically to the rationality and ontological status of physics, taking as a starting point some works of the philosopher of science Evandro Agazzi. The article presented hereintroduces Agazzi’s thought and the core issues of his epistemology. It then defines the concepts of rigor and objectivity as understood by Agazzi, and finally establishes criteria of rigor and objectivity for physics, showing how they are verified in two classical experiments. Based on these ideas, it is shown that physics, as the science it is, has criteria of rigor and objectivity that allow it to effectively reach the real, thus responding to the formalist and pragmatist challenge. Thus, the article does notexhaust itself in a description of Agazzi’s thought, but will apply his ideas to the concrete field of physics, making explicit ideas that have not been sufficiently made explicit by the Italian philosopher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophía\",\"volume\":\"25 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophía\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n37.2024.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophía","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n37.2024.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当前的认识论中,对实证科学存在两种截然相反的态度。一方面,实证科学似乎是推动知识进步的重要工具。另一方面,人们又对这种自信的非科学知识的形而上学和认识论基础表示怀疑,这导致科学走上了怀疑论和实用主义的道路。本文旨在以科学哲学家埃万德罗-阿加齐(Evandro Agazzi)的一些著作为出发点,从哲学角度探讨物理学的合理性和本体论地位。本文介绍了阿加齐的思想及其认识论的核心问题。然后,文章定义了阿加齐所理解的严谨性和客观性概念,最后确立了物理学的严谨性和客观性标准,并展示了这些标准是如何在两个经典实验中得到验证的。基于这些观点,文章表明,物理学作为一门科学,其严谨性和客观性标准使其能够有效地触及现实,从而回应了形式主义和实用主义的挑战。因此,这篇文章并没有穷尽对阿加齐思想的描述,而是将他的思想应用于具体的物理学领域,阐明了这位意大利哲学家尚未充分阐明的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rigor and objectivity as foundations of the rationality of physics in Evandro Agazzi
In current epistemology, there are two opposing attitudes towards the empirical sciences. Onthe one hand, they appear as an essential tool for the advancement of knowledge. On the otherhand, there is doubt about the metaphysical and epistemological bases of this confidence inscientific knowledge, which has led science down paths of skepticism and pragmatism. This paper aims to contribute philosophically to the rationality and ontological status of physics, taking as a starting point some works of the philosopher of science Evandro Agazzi. The article presented hereintroduces Agazzi’s thought and the core issues of his epistemology. It then defines the concepts of rigor and objectivity as understood by Agazzi, and finally establishes criteria of rigor and objectivity for physics, showing how they are verified in two classical experiments. Based on these ideas, it is shown that physics, as the science it is, has criteria of rigor and objectivity that allow it to effectively reach the real, thus responding to the formalist and pragmatist challenge. Thus, the article does notexhaust itself in a description of Agazzi’s thought, but will apply his ideas to the concrete field of physics, making explicit ideas that have not been sufficiently made explicit by the Italian philosopher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信