现象学与意识概念

Abigale Cherono
{"title":"现象学与意识概念","authors":"Abigale Cherono","doi":"10.47941/ijp.2092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. Preliminary empirical review revealed a complex relationship between subjective experience and cognitive and neural mechanisms. It demonstrated that phenomenology, focusing on first-person perspectives and intentionality, offers a robust framework for understanding consciousness as an active, embodied engagement with the world. The integration of phenomenological insights with cognitive science and neuroscience provided a comprehensive view, correlating subjective reports with neural activity. This approach proved valuable in clinical settings, enhancing mental health interventions by focusing on individual experiences. The study highlighted the promise of ongoing interdisciplinary research to advance both scientific and philosophical understandings of consciousness. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Intentionality, Embodies Cognition Theory and Global Workspace Theory may be used to anchor future studies on phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. The study recommended further development of theoretical frameworks integrating phenomenology with cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary research collaborations. It suggested incorporating phenomenological approaches into mental health practices to enhance patient-centered care and advocated for training healthcare professionals in these methods. The study also advised policymakers to integrate phenomenological findings into mental health policies and prioritize funding for programs that recognize subjective experiences. Lastly, it highlighted the need for future research to explore long-term effects, cultural factors, and new neuroimaging techniques to advance the understanding of consciousness.","PeriodicalId":512816,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"42 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenomenology and the Concept of Consciousness\",\"authors\":\"Abigale Cherono\",\"doi\":\"10.47941/ijp.2092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. \\nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \\nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. Preliminary empirical review revealed a complex relationship between subjective experience and cognitive and neural mechanisms. It demonstrated that phenomenology, focusing on first-person perspectives and intentionality, offers a robust framework for understanding consciousness as an active, embodied engagement with the world. The integration of phenomenological insights with cognitive science and neuroscience provided a comprehensive view, correlating subjective reports with neural activity. This approach proved valuable in clinical settings, enhancing mental health interventions by focusing on individual experiences. The study highlighted the promise of ongoing interdisciplinary research to advance both scientific and philosophical understandings of consciousness. \\nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Intentionality, Embodies Cognition Theory and Global Workspace Theory may be used to anchor future studies on phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. The study recommended further development of theoretical frameworks integrating phenomenology with cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary research collaborations. It suggested incorporating phenomenological approaches into mental health practices to enhance patient-centered care and advocated for training healthcare professionals in these methods. The study also advised policymakers to integrate phenomenological findings into mental health policies and prioritize funding for programs that recognize subjective experiences. Lastly, it highlighted the need for future research to explore long-term effects, cultural factors, and new neuroimaging techniques to advance the understanding of consciousness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"42 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的总体目标是探索现象学和意识概念。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此,与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及执行人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在现象学和意识概念方面存在着背景和方法上的差距。初步的实证审查揭示了主观经验与认知和神经机制之间的复杂关系。研究表明,以第一人称视角和意向性为重点的现象学为理解意识提供了一个强有力的框架,意识是对世界的一种积极的、体现性的参与。现象学见解与认知科学和神经科学的结合提供了一个全面的视角,将主观报告与神经活动联系起来。事实证明,这种方法在临床环境中很有价值,它通过关注个体体验来加强心理健康干预。这项研究凸显了正在进行的跨学科研究在推进对意识的科学和哲学理解方面的前景。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:意向性理论、体现认知理论和全局工作空间理论可用于未来的现象学和意识概念研究。研究建议进一步发展将现象学与认知神经科学相结合的理论框架,强调跨学科研究合作的必要性。它建议将现象学方法纳入心理健康实践,以加强以病人为中心的护理,并倡导对医疗保健专业人员进行这些方法的培训。研究还建议政策制定者将现象学研究成果纳入心理健康政策,并优先资助认可主观体验的项目。最后,研究强调了未来研究的必要性,以探索长期影响、文化因素和新的神经影像技术,从而促进对意识的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenomenology and the Concept of Consciousness
Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. Preliminary empirical review revealed a complex relationship between subjective experience and cognitive and neural mechanisms. It demonstrated that phenomenology, focusing on first-person perspectives and intentionality, offers a robust framework for understanding consciousness as an active, embodied engagement with the world. The integration of phenomenological insights with cognitive science and neuroscience provided a comprehensive view, correlating subjective reports with neural activity. This approach proved valuable in clinical settings, enhancing mental health interventions by focusing on individual experiences. The study highlighted the promise of ongoing interdisciplinary research to advance both scientific and philosophical understandings of consciousness. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Intentionality, Embodies Cognition Theory and Global Workspace Theory may be used to anchor future studies on phenomenology and the concept of consciousness. The study recommended further development of theoretical frameworks integrating phenomenology with cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary research collaborations. It suggested incorporating phenomenological approaches into mental health practices to enhance patient-centered care and advocated for training healthcare professionals in these methods. The study also advised policymakers to integrate phenomenological findings into mental health policies and prioritize funding for programs that recognize subjective experiences. Lastly, it highlighted the need for future research to explore long-term effects, cultural factors, and new neuroimaging techniques to advance the understanding of consciousness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信