2015 年至 2022 年有关科学本质的文章分析

Q3 Social Sciences
F. K. Uyar, Remziye Uludağ Kırçıl, Şafak Uluçınar Sağır
{"title":"2015 年至 2022 年有关科学本质的文章分析","authors":"F. K. Uyar, Remziye Uludağ Kırçıl, Şafak Uluçınar Sağır","doi":"10.17275/per.24.57.11.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is evident that knowing the nature of science is a requirement for “science education”, which serves as the basis of conscious citizenship. For this reason, articles concerning the nature of science that were published in the Web of Science and EBSCOhost database between 2015 and 2022 were examined in this study in order to establish a broad framework and develop a research road map. A qualitative design approach and a descriptive review method were used. The keywords \"Nature of Science (NoS) and Science Education\" and \"Teaching of Nature of Science (NoS) and Science Education\" were used. The majority of the 107 articles on the nature of science that have been examined preferred qualitative research designs, and \"Science & Education\" is the publication that has published the most articles on the subject in 2017-2018-2020, pre-service teachers were mostly preferred as the sample group, it was applied to groups of “21-50” people as the sample group, open reflective approach was preferred as the teaching approach, the most commonly used method-technique was “discussion”, the activities used in the articles were generally standard, semi-structured interview form was preferred as the evaluation tool and “VNOS-C” was deployed as the questionnaire. Studies may be conducted within the boundaries of further lectures on the topic and internationally published theses.","PeriodicalId":36886,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Educational Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Articles on the Nature of Science between 2015 and 2022\",\"authors\":\"F. K. Uyar, Remziye Uludağ Kırçıl, Şafak Uluçınar Sağır\",\"doi\":\"10.17275/per.24.57.11.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is evident that knowing the nature of science is a requirement for “science education”, which serves as the basis of conscious citizenship. For this reason, articles concerning the nature of science that were published in the Web of Science and EBSCOhost database between 2015 and 2022 were examined in this study in order to establish a broad framework and develop a research road map. A qualitative design approach and a descriptive review method were used. The keywords \\\"Nature of Science (NoS) and Science Education\\\" and \\\"Teaching of Nature of Science (NoS) and Science Education\\\" were used. The majority of the 107 articles on the nature of science that have been examined preferred qualitative research designs, and \\\"Science & Education\\\" is the publication that has published the most articles on the subject in 2017-2018-2020, pre-service teachers were mostly preferred as the sample group, it was applied to groups of “21-50” people as the sample group, open reflective approach was preferred as the teaching approach, the most commonly used method-technique was “discussion”, the activities used in the articles were generally standard, semi-structured interview form was preferred as the evaluation tool and “VNOS-C” was deployed as the questionnaire. Studies may be conducted within the boundaries of further lectures on the topic and internationally published theses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Participatory Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Participatory Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.57.11.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.57.11.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

显然,了解科学的本质是 "科学教育 "的要求,而 "科学教育 "则是自觉公民意识的基础。因此,本研究对 2015 年至 2022 年期间在 Web of Science 和 EBSCOhost 数据库中发表的有关科学本质的文章进行了研究,以建立一个广泛的框架并制定研究路线图。研究采用了定性设计方法和描述性综述方法。关键词为 "科学本质(NoS)与科学教育 "和 "科学本质(NoS)教学与科学教育"。在已考察的107篇关于科学本质的文章中,大多数偏好质性研究设计,《科学与教育》是2017-2018-2020年发表相关文章最多的刊物,职前教师多被偏好作为样本群体,它适用于 "21-50 "人群作为样本群体、教学方法首选开放式反思法,最常用的方法技术是 "讨论法",文章中使用的活动一般是标准活动,评价工具首选半结构化访谈形式,问卷采用 "VNOS-C"。可以在有关该主题的进一步讲座和国际发表的论文范围内开展研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Articles on the Nature of Science between 2015 and 2022
It is evident that knowing the nature of science is a requirement for “science education”, which serves as the basis of conscious citizenship. For this reason, articles concerning the nature of science that were published in the Web of Science and EBSCOhost database between 2015 and 2022 were examined in this study in order to establish a broad framework and develop a research road map. A qualitative design approach and a descriptive review method were used. The keywords "Nature of Science (NoS) and Science Education" and "Teaching of Nature of Science (NoS) and Science Education" were used. The majority of the 107 articles on the nature of science that have been examined preferred qualitative research designs, and "Science & Education" is the publication that has published the most articles on the subject in 2017-2018-2020, pre-service teachers were mostly preferred as the sample group, it was applied to groups of “21-50” people as the sample group, open reflective approach was preferred as the teaching approach, the most commonly used method-technique was “discussion”, the activities used in the articles were generally standard, semi-structured interview form was preferred as the evaluation tool and “VNOS-C” was deployed as the questionnaire. Studies may be conducted within the boundaries of further lectures on the topic and internationally published theses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Participatory Educational Research
Participatory Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信