中国西部阿里亚斯强度与峰值地面加速度之间的经验关系

Jia Mei Liu, Bin Zhang, Xuan Zhao
{"title":"中国西部阿里亚斯强度与峰值地面加速度之间的经验关系","authors":"Jia Mei Liu, Bin Zhang, Xuan Zhao","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1434194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is little available attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity (AI) in China. Empirical relationships between AI and peak ground acceleration (PGA) provide another option for predicting AI. We establish empirical relationships for AI and PGA for western China, utilizing 3,169 horizontal and 979 vertical strong motion records with PGA ≥0.01 g from 274 earthquakes (MS 4.0–8.0), originating in eight provinces in southwest (Yunnan, Sichuan) and northwest China (Gansu, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang). The influences of MS epicenter distance, and site conditions indicators VS30, generic site classes (i.e., rock and soil) are explored. The results show that the logarithm of AI increases linearly with the increase of the logarithm of PGA and MS, and decreases with the logarithm of VS30. However, the influence of site conditions on AI-PAG relationships can't be recognized by the simple generic rock and soil site classes. The epicenter distance has little effect on the AI-PAG relationships. Empirical relationships are developed to estimate horizontal or vertical AI as a function of PGA (basic model), PGA and MS (model 2) for southwest, northwest, and western China, using all the records. Empirical relationships for AI as a function of PGA, MS, and VS30 (model 1) are established using the 2,248 horizontal (70.9% of the total) and 670 vertical (68.4% of the total) records with VS30 between 148 and 841m/s. The notable disparity between model 1 of the southwest and northwest regions is chiefly attributed to local site conditions, indicating that the AI-PGA correlation is region-dependent. These findings enable one way of estimating AI for western China and will contribute to a better understanding of AI attenuation.","PeriodicalId":505744,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"24 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical relationships between Arias Intensity and peak ground acceleration for western China\",\"authors\":\"Jia Mei Liu, Bin Zhang, Xuan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/feart.2024.1434194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is little available attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity (AI) in China. Empirical relationships between AI and peak ground acceleration (PGA) provide another option for predicting AI. We establish empirical relationships for AI and PGA for western China, utilizing 3,169 horizontal and 979 vertical strong motion records with PGA ≥0.01 g from 274 earthquakes (MS 4.0–8.0), originating in eight provinces in southwest (Yunnan, Sichuan) and northwest China (Gansu, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang). The influences of MS epicenter distance, and site conditions indicators VS30, generic site classes (i.e., rock and soil) are explored. The results show that the logarithm of AI increases linearly with the increase of the logarithm of PGA and MS, and decreases with the logarithm of VS30. However, the influence of site conditions on AI-PAG relationships can't be recognized by the simple generic rock and soil site classes. The epicenter distance has little effect on the AI-PAG relationships. Empirical relationships are developed to estimate horizontal or vertical AI as a function of PGA (basic model), PGA and MS (model 2) for southwest, northwest, and western China, using all the records. Empirical relationships for AI as a function of PGA, MS, and VS30 (model 1) are established using the 2,248 horizontal (70.9% of the total) and 670 vertical (68.4% of the total) records with VS30 between 148 and 841m/s. The notable disparity between model 1 of the southwest and northwest regions is chiefly attributed to local site conditions, indicating that the AI-PGA correlation is region-dependent. These findings enable one way of estimating AI for western China and will contribute to a better understanding of AI attenuation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Earth Science\",\"volume\":\"24 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Earth Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1434194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1434194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国,几乎没有可用的阿里亚斯强度(AI)衰减关系。阿里亚斯强度与峰值地面加速度(PGA)之间的经验关系为预测阿里亚斯强度提供了另一种选择。我们利用中国西南(云南、四川)和西北(甘肃、陕西、宁夏、青海、内蒙古和新疆)八省区 274 次地震(MS 4.0-8.0)中 PGA ≥0.01 g 的 3,169 条水平强震记录和 979 条垂直强震记录,建立了中国西部地区阿里亚斯强度与 PGA 的经验关系。探讨了 MS 震中距、场地条件指标 VS30、场地类别(即岩石和土壤)的影响。结果表明,AI 的对数随 PGA 和 MS 对数的增加而线性增加,随 VS30 对数的增加而减小。然而,场地条件对 AI-PAG 关系的影响并不能通过简单的通用岩土场地等级来识别。震中距对 AI-PAG 关系的影响很小。利用所有记录,建立了经验关系来估算中国西南、西北和西部的水平或垂直 AI 与 PGA(基本模型)、PGA 和 MS(模型 2)的函数关系。利用 VS30 在 148 至 841m/s 之间的 2,248 条水平记录(占总数的 70.9%)和 670 条垂直记录(占总数的 68.4%),建立了 AI 与 PGA、MS 和 VS30 的函数关系(模式 1)。西南地区和西北地区模型 1 之间的显著差异主要归因于当地的场地条件,表明 AI-PGA 相关性取决于地区。这些发现为估算中国西部的人工影响提供了一种方法,有助于更好地理解人工影响衰减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical relationships between Arias Intensity and peak ground acceleration for western China
There is little available attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity (AI) in China. Empirical relationships between AI and peak ground acceleration (PGA) provide another option for predicting AI. We establish empirical relationships for AI and PGA for western China, utilizing 3,169 horizontal and 979 vertical strong motion records with PGA ≥0.01 g from 274 earthquakes (MS 4.0–8.0), originating in eight provinces in southwest (Yunnan, Sichuan) and northwest China (Gansu, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang). The influences of MS epicenter distance, and site conditions indicators VS30, generic site classes (i.e., rock and soil) are explored. The results show that the logarithm of AI increases linearly with the increase of the logarithm of PGA and MS, and decreases with the logarithm of VS30. However, the influence of site conditions on AI-PAG relationships can't be recognized by the simple generic rock and soil site classes. The epicenter distance has little effect on the AI-PAG relationships. Empirical relationships are developed to estimate horizontal or vertical AI as a function of PGA (basic model), PGA and MS (model 2) for southwest, northwest, and western China, using all the records. Empirical relationships for AI as a function of PGA, MS, and VS30 (model 1) are established using the 2,248 horizontal (70.9% of the total) and 670 vertical (68.4% of the total) records with VS30 between 148 and 841m/s. The notable disparity between model 1 of the southwest and northwest regions is chiefly attributed to local site conditions, indicating that the AI-PGA correlation is region-dependent. These findings enable one way of estimating AI for western China and will contribute to a better understanding of AI attenuation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信