门主

Adam Staley Groves Groves
{"title":"门主","authors":"Adam Staley Groves Groves","doi":"10.59391/inscriptions.v7i2.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before anything else Søren Kierkegaard is considered a philosopher however Jean André Wahl writes “He is not a philosopher, he would say ... and had no philosophy to call ‘philosophy of existence’ or to oppose other philosophies.” Wahl’s depiction raises essential questions. If Kierkegaard is not a philosopher how should we regard him? Furthermore, what might we learn about contemporary life (if not philosophy itself) if we understand Kierkegaard’s persona and insight independent of its philosophical frame? To develop our understanding Kierkegaard is considered akin to Wallace Stevens’s concept of “a poetry of thought” which designates a theory of poetry according to poets distinct from philosophy. For both Kierkegaard and Stevens authored singular prose thus we should not ignore the nature of his theory which may belong to poetry as potentially validated by Jean Wahl, a philosopher whom Stevens befriended.","PeriodicalId":32883,"journal":{"name":"Inscriptions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lord of the door\",\"authors\":\"Adam Staley Groves Groves\",\"doi\":\"10.59391/inscriptions.v7i2.192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before anything else Søren Kierkegaard is considered a philosopher however Jean André Wahl writes “He is not a philosopher, he would say ... and had no philosophy to call ‘philosophy of existence’ or to oppose other philosophies.” Wahl’s depiction raises essential questions. If Kierkegaard is not a philosopher how should we regard him? Furthermore, what might we learn about contemporary life (if not philosophy itself) if we understand Kierkegaard’s persona and insight independent of its philosophical frame? To develop our understanding Kierkegaard is considered akin to Wallace Stevens’s concept of “a poetry of thought” which designates a theory of poetry according to poets distinct from philosophy. For both Kierkegaard and Stevens authored singular prose thus we should not ignore the nature of his theory which may belong to poetry as potentially validated by Jean Wahl, a philosopher whom Stevens befriended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inscriptions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inscriptions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59391/inscriptions.v7i2.192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inscriptions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59391/inscriptions.v7i2.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

索伦-克尔凯郭尔首先被认为是一位哲学家,然而让-安德烈-瓦尔写道:"他不是哲学家,他会说......他没有哲学可称为'存在哲学',也没有哲学可反对其他哲学"。瓦尔的描述提出了一些基本问题。如果克尔凯郭尔不是哲学家,我们应该如何看待他?此外,如果我们不拘泥于哲学框架来理解克尔凯郭尔的人格和洞察力,我们对当代生活(如果不是哲学本身的话)又能了解到什么呢?为了加深我们对克尔凯郭尔的理解,我们将其视为类似于华莱士-史蒂文斯(Wallace Stevens)的 "思想的诗歌 "这一概念。克尔凯郭尔和史蒂文斯的作品都是单一的散文,因此我们不应忽视他的理论的性质,他的理论可能属于诗歌,史蒂文斯结识的哲学家让-瓦尔(Jean Wahl)可能证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lord of the door
Before anything else Søren Kierkegaard is considered a philosopher however Jean André Wahl writes “He is not a philosopher, he would say ... and had no philosophy to call ‘philosophy of existence’ or to oppose other philosophies.” Wahl’s depiction raises essential questions. If Kierkegaard is not a philosopher how should we regard him? Furthermore, what might we learn about contemporary life (if not philosophy itself) if we understand Kierkegaard’s persona and insight independent of its philosophical frame? To develop our understanding Kierkegaard is considered akin to Wallace Stevens’s concept of “a poetry of thought” which designates a theory of poetry according to poets distinct from philosophy. For both Kierkegaard and Stevens authored singular prose thus we should not ignore the nature of his theory which may belong to poetry as potentially validated by Jean Wahl, a philosopher whom Stevens befriended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信