{"title":"管理同性恋活动:国家资助国际 LGBTI 组织的权力与能见度","authors":"Emil Edenborg, Cecilia Strand","doi":"10.1332/25151088y2024d000000041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how international lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) activism is governed through state funding. Through archival material documenting the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency’s (SIDA’s) funding of two international LGBTI organizations – the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association and the Swedish Federation of LGBTQI Rights – complemented with interviews, we analyse power relations and management practices, how these are reconciled with SIDA’s efforts to make LGBTI funding more partner oriented, and the consequences for recipients. Our main finding is that within the funding schemes, control is exercised in less direct, hierarchical and overt ways than seems to be implied in some critiques of donor influence and ‘neocolonialism’ in the Western promotion of LGBTI rights. Instead, government takes place in multifaceted and horizontal ways, involving a variety of actors, which makes the exercise of power less visible but nonetheless far-reaching. Through SIDA’s funding schemes, power relations are reproduced in specific ways, including the partial reshaping of activist organizations into bureaucratized and depoliticized state ‘partners’.","PeriodicalId":507922,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing queer activism: power and visibility in state funding of international LGBTI organizations\",\"authors\":\"Emil Edenborg, Cecilia Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/25151088y2024d000000041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines how international lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) activism is governed through state funding. Through archival material documenting the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency’s (SIDA’s) funding of two international LGBTI organizations – the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association and the Swedish Federation of LGBTQI Rights – complemented with interviews, we analyse power relations and management practices, how these are reconciled with SIDA’s efforts to make LGBTI funding more partner oriented, and the consequences for recipients. Our main finding is that within the funding schemes, control is exercised in less direct, hierarchical and overt ways than seems to be implied in some critiques of donor influence and ‘neocolonialism’ in the Western promotion of LGBTI rights. Instead, government takes place in multifaceted and horizontal ways, involving a variety of actors, which makes the exercise of power less visible but nonetheless far-reaching. Through SIDA’s funding schemes, power relations are reproduced in specific ways, including the partial reshaping of activist organizations into bureaucratized and depoliticized state ‘partners’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Politics and Gender\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Politics and Gender\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2024d000000041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088y2024d000000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了国际女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和双性人 (LGBTI) 活动是如何通过国家资助进行管理的。通过记录瑞典国际开发合作署(SIDA)资助两个国际 LGBTI 组织--国际女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性者和双性人协会(International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association)和瑞典 LGBTQI 权利联合会(Swedish Federation of LGBTQI Rights)--的档案资料,并辅以访谈,我们分析了权力关系和管理实践,这些是如何与瑞典国际开发合作署(SIDA)使 LGBTI 资助更加面向合作伙伴的努力相协调的,以及对受助者的影响。我们的主要发现是,在资助计划中,控制的方式并不像某些批评所暗示的那样直接、等级分明和公开,因为在西方促进 LGBTI 权利的过程中,捐助者的影响和 "新殖民主义 "似乎并不那么明显。相反,政府以多层面、横向的方式行使权力,涉及各种行为者,这使得权力的行使不那么明显,但却影响深远。通过瑞典国际开发署(SIDA)的资助计划,权力关系以特定的方式再现,包括将激进组织部分重塑为官僚化和非政治化的国家 "合作伙伴"。
Governing queer activism: power and visibility in state funding of international LGBTI organizations
This article examines how international lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) activism is governed through state funding. Through archival material documenting the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency’s (SIDA’s) funding of two international LGBTI organizations – the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association and the Swedish Federation of LGBTQI Rights – complemented with interviews, we analyse power relations and management practices, how these are reconciled with SIDA’s efforts to make LGBTI funding more partner oriented, and the consequences for recipients. Our main finding is that within the funding schemes, control is exercised in less direct, hierarchical and overt ways than seems to be implied in some critiques of donor influence and ‘neocolonialism’ in the Western promotion of LGBTI rights. Instead, government takes place in multifaceted and horizontal ways, involving a variety of actors, which makes the exercise of power less visible but nonetheless far-reaching. Through SIDA’s funding schemes, power relations are reproduced in specific ways, including the partial reshaping of activist organizations into bureaucratized and depoliticized state ‘partners’.