利用冠状动脉钙化评分对一级预防患者的心血管疾病风险和一级预防治疗进行重新评估

Abdulla Arslan, Fatih Aytemiz, İclal Işıklar, Öykü Gülmez Özkaya
{"title":"利用冠状动脉钙化评分对一级预防患者的心血管疾病风险和一级预防治疗进行重新评估","authors":"Abdulla Arslan, Fatih Aytemiz, İclal Işıklar, Öykü Gülmez Özkaya","doi":"10.3390/jcm13144125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is used as a screening tool to identify the presence/absence of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals. We evaluated the risk categories and medical therapy of asymptomatic individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS > 0) and applied the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score and Framingham risk score (FRS) to assess those at a high risk of subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS ≥ 400). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 218 asymptomatic individuals (65.6% women, and mean age 67.5 ± 10.3 years) who had their CACS evaluated at the cardiovascular department of our hospital between 2016 and 2020. Results: Among the 218 participants, 24.3% were classified as low-risk according to the FRS, and 19.3% had no subclinical atherosclerosis. However, only 12.8% and 27.5% of the study population were taking statins and aspirin, respectively. Furthermore, although more than half of the individuals without subclinical atherosclerosis were in the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the risk scores, there were no considerable differences in the rates of taking aspirin and statins between the groups. When patients in the very-high-risk group according to the CACS and low-intermediate-risk patients were compared, there was no considerable difference in the rates of risk subgroups and taking statins, whereas high-risk patients took statistically significantly more aspirin. Conclusions: In primary prevention screening, CACS can be used as a reliable marker of subclinical ASCVD and help physicians optimize and improve adherence to medical therapy, including aspirin and statins, particularly for high-risk individuals.","PeriodicalId":510228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Evaluation of Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Primary Prevention Treatments with Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Primary Prevention Patients\",\"authors\":\"Abdulla Arslan, Fatih Aytemiz, İclal Işıklar, Öykü Gülmez Özkaya\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13144125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is used as a screening tool to identify the presence/absence of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals. We evaluated the risk categories and medical therapy of asymptomatic individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS > 0) and applied the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score and Framingham risk score (FRS) to assess those at a high risk of subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS ≥ 400). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 218 asymptomatic individuals (65.6% women, and mean age 67.5 ± 10.3 years) who had their CACS evaluated at the cardiovascular department of our hospital between 2016 and 2020. Results: Among the 218 participants, 24.3% were classified as low-risk according to the FRS, and 19.3% had no subclinical atherosclerosis. However, only 12.8% and 27.5% of the study population were taking statins and aspirin, respectively. Furthermore, although more than half of the individuals without subclinical atherosclerosis were in the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the risk scores, there were no considerable differences in the rates of taking aspirin and statins between the groups. When patients in the very-high-risk group according to the CACS and low-intermediate-risk patients were compared, there was no considerable difference in the rates of risk subgroups and taking statins, whereas high-risk patients took statistically significantly more aspirin. Conclusions: In primary prevention screening, CACS can be used as a reliable marker of subclinical ASCVD and help physicians optimize and improve adherence to medical therapy, including aspirin and statins, particularly for high-risk individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)是一种筛查工具,用于确定无症状者是否存在亚临床动脉粥样硬化。我们评估了亚临床动脉粥样硬化(CACS > 0)无症状者的风险类别和药物治疗,并应用动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)评分和弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)评估亚临床动脉粥样硬化高风险者(CACS ≥ 400)。研究方法我们回顾性地纳入了2016年至2020年间在本院心血管科接受CACS评估的218名无症状者(65.6%为女性,平均年龄(67.5 ± 10.3)岁)。结果在 218 名参与者中,24.3% 根据 FRS 被归类为低风险,19.3% 没有亚临床动脉粥样硬化。然而,只有 12.8% 和 27.5% 的研究对象分别服用他汀类药物和阿司匹林。此外,虽然根据风险评分,半数以上没有亚临床动脉粥样硬化的人属于中危和高危人群,但不同人群服用阿司匹林和他汀类药物的比例并无明显差异。如果将根据 CACS 属于极高风险组的患者与中低风险组的患者进行比较,则风险亚组和服用他汀类药物的比例没有明显差异,而高风险患者服用阿司匹林的比例在统计学上明显更高。结论是在一级预防筛查中,CACS 可作为亚临床 ASCVD 的可靠标记,帮助医生优化和改善药物治疗(包括阿司匹林和他汀类药物)的依从性,尤其是对于高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-Evaluation of Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Primary Prevention Treatments with Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Primary Prevention Patients
Objective: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is used as a screening tool to identify the presence/absence of subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals. We evaluated the risk categories and medical therapy of asymptomatic individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS > 0) and applied the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) score and Framingham risk score (FRS) to assess those at a high risk of subclinical atherosclerosis (CACS ≥ 400). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 218 asymptomatic individuals (65.6% women, and mean age 67.5 ± 10.3 years) who had their CACS evaluated at the cardiovascular department of our hospital between 2016 and 2020. Results: Among the 218 participants, 24.3% were classified as low-risk according to the FRS, and 19.3% had no subclinical atherosclerosis. However, only 12.8% and 27.5% of the study population were taking statins and aspirin, respectively. Furthermore, although more than half of the individuals without subclinical atherosclerosis were in the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the risk scores, there were no considerable differences in the rates of taking aspirin and statins between the groups. When patients in the very-high-risk group according to the CACS and low-intermediate-risk patients were compared, there was no considerable difference in the rates of risk subgroups and taking statins, whereas high-risk patients took statistically significantly more aspirin. Conclusions: In primary prevention screening, CACS can be used as a reliable marker of subclinical ASCVD and help physicians optimize and improve adherence to medical therapy, including aspirin and statins, particularly for high-risk individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信