COVID-19 疫苗接种事实核查中的话语权威:Instagram 上的 @butantanoficial 案例

Augusto Vinicius de Oliveira, Gabriel Guimarães Alexandre, F. Komesu, Juliana Alves Assis, Cédric Fluckiger
{"title":"COVID-19 疫苗接种事实核查中的话语权威:Instagram 上的 @butantanoficial 案例","authors":"Augusto Vinicius de Oliveira, Gabriel Guimarães Alexandre, F. Komesu, Juliana Alves Assis, Cédric Fluckiger","doi":"10.21165/gel.v20i3.3584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the theoretical-methodological perspective of New Literacy Studies and French Discourse Analysis, this paper aims to investigate discursive strategies employed by Butantan Institute in publications aimed at debunking dis- or misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil. The corpus consists of 32 visual-verbal textual productions (posts) published by the @butantanoficial profile on the digital social network Instagram in the years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. The hypothesis, grounded in the studies of Amossy (2022), is that over these years, the Institute has made various attempts to establish authority in the discourse surrounding COVID-19 vaccination, particularly concerning the possession of what would be perceived as “true statements” about vaccination, in contrast to “false statements”, within a context of disinformation and fake news. The results highlight the prioritization of strategies in the discursive construction and re-elaboration of an ethos closely tied to different demands from the public as well as to interests of the Institute itself, across various stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":31121,"journal":{"name":"Revista do GEL","volume":"52 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discursive authority in COVID-19 vaccination fact-checking: the case of @butantanoficial on Instagram\",\"authors\":\"Augusto Vinicius de Oliveira, Gabriel Guimarães Alexandre, F. Komesu, Juliana Alves Assis, Cédric Fluckiger\",\"doi\":\"10.21165/gel.v20i3.3584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the theoretical-methodological perspective of New Literacy Studies and French Discourse Analysis, this paper aims to investigate discursive strategies employed by Butantan Institute in publications aimed at debunking dis- or misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil. The corpus consists of 32 visual-verbal textual productions (posts) published by the @butantanoficial profile on the digital social network Instagram in the years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. The hypothesis, grounded in the studies of Amossy (2022), is that over these years, the Institute has made various attempts to establish authority in the discourse surrounding COVID-19 vaccination, particularly concerning the possession of what would be perceived as “true statements” about vaccination, in contrast to “false statements”, within a context of disinformation and fake news. The results highlight the prioritization of strategies in the discursive construction and re-elaboration of an ethos closely tied to different demands from the public as well as to interests of the Institute itself, across various stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do GEL\",\"volume\":\"52 27\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do GEL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21165/gel.v20i3.3584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do GEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21165/gel.v20i3.3584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从 "新识字研究 "和 "法语话语分析 "的理论-方法论角度出发,旨在研究布坦坦研究所在旨在揭穿巴西 COVID-19 疫苗接种的虚假或错误信息的出版物中所采用的话语策略。语料库由数字社交网络 Instagram 上的 @butantanoficial 个人主页在 2020、2021、2022 和 2023 年发布的 32 篇视觉语言文本作品(帖子)组成。根据 Amossy(2022 年)的研究提出的假设是,在这些年里,该研究所在围绕 COVID-19 疫苗接种的讨论中做出了各种尝试,以树立权威,特别是在虚假信息和假新闻的背景下,与 "虚假声明 "相比,拥有被视为有关疫苗接种的 "真实声明"。研究结果凸显了在 COVID-19 大流行的各个阶段,在话语建构和重新阐释与公众不同需求以及研究所自身利益密切相关的精神时的优先策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discursive authority in COVID-19 vaccination fact-checking: the case of @butantanoficial on Instagram
From the theoretical-methodological perspective of New Literacy Studies and French Discourse Analysis, this paper aims to investigate discursive strategies employed by Butantan Institute in publications aimed at debunking dis- or misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil. The corpus consists of 32 visual-verbal textual productions (posts) published by the @butantanoficial profile on the digital social network Instagram in the years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. The hypothesis, grounded in the studies of Amossy (2022), is that over these years, the Institute has made various attempts to establish authority in the discourse surrounding COVID-19 vaccination, particularly concerning the possession of what would be perceived as “true statements” about vaccination, in contrast to “false statements”, within a context of disinformation and fake news. The results highlight the prioritization of strategies in the discursive construction and re-elaboration of an ethos closely tied to different demands from the public as well as to interests of the Institute itself, across various stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信