4L 运货转向架的垂直和横向动力学性能

Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.3390/dynamics4030029
G. Megna
{"title":"4L 运货转向架的垂直和横向动力学性能","authors":"G. Megna","doi":"10.3390/dynamics4030029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freight wagons in Europe have used Y25 bogies since the 1960s. Although very cost-effective, Y25 suffers from intrinsic limitations due to its architecture and running behaviour. This study introduces an innovative lightweight bogie, named 4L bogie, aimed at removing those limitations as well as improving running dynamics and track friendliness. This task was particularly challenging as the high ratio between laden and tare weight (up to 5:1) forced us to use a non-conventional suspension system and an innovative architecture of frame, reducing the mass by about 15% and the yaw moment of inertia by about 30% with respect to the Y25 bogie. Maintenance issues were addressed by reducing the number of components and easing overhaul, while the new design was validated from both the structural and the running dynamics point of view, assessing its interaction with the track in terms of stability, curving behaviour and the vertical response of the 4L bogie. Stability was improved by about 20% even in empty conditions and high conicity at the wheel/rail contact. Vertical dynamic force on a straight track, evaluated according to the Ride Force Count metric, and wear behaviour on sharp and mild curves were considerably reduced, leading to an improved track friendliness of the bogie.","PeriodicalId":507568,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics","volume":"70 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertical and Lateral Dynamics of 4L Freight Bogie\",\"authors\":\"G. Megna\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dynamics4030029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Freight wagons in Europe have used Y25 bogies since the 1960s. Although very cost-effective, Y25 suffers from intrinsic limitations due to its architecture and running behaviour. This study introduces an innovative lightweight bogie, named 4L bogie, aimed at removing those limitations as well as improving running dynamics and track friendliness. This task was particularly challenging as the high ratio between laden and tare weight (up to 5:1) forced us to use a non-conventional suspension system and an innovative architecture of frame, reducing the mass by about 15% and the yaw moment of inertia by about 30% with respect to the Y25 bogie. Maintenance issues were addressed by reducing the number of components and easing overhaul, while the new design was validated from both the structural and the running dynamics point of view, assessing its interaction with the track in terms of stability, curving behaviour and the vertical response of the 4L bogie. Stability was improved by about 20% even in empty conditions and high conicity at the wheel/rail contact. Vertical dynamic force on a straight track, evaluated according to the Ride Force Count metric, and wear behaviour on sharp and mild curves were considerably reduced, leading to an improved track friendliness of the bogie.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"70 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics4030029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics4030029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,欧洲的货车一直使用 Y25 转向架。尽管 Y25 具有很高的成本效益,但由于其结构和运行性能,它存在一些固有的局限性。本研究引入了一种创新的轻型转向架,命名为 4L 转向架,旨在消除这些限制,并改善运行动态和轨道友好性。这项任务特别具有挑战性,因为载重量和皮重量之间的高比率(高达 5:1)迫使我们使用非常规悬挂系统和创新的框架结构,与 Y25 转向架相比,质量减少了约 15%,偏航惯性矩减少了约 30%。通过减少部件数量和简化检修,解决了维护问题,同时从结构和运行动力学角度对新设计进行了验证,从稳定性、转弯性能和 4L 转向架的垂直响应方面评估了其与轨道的相互作用。即使在空载和车轮/轨道接触处高锥度的情况下,稳定性也提高了约 20%。直线轨道上的垂直动态力(根据乘坐力计数指标进行评估)以及急弯和缓和弯道上的磨损情况都大大减少,从而提高了转向架的轨道友好性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vertical and Lateral Dynamics of 4L Freight Bogie
Freight wagons in Europe have used Y25 bogies since the 1960s. Although very cost-effective, Y25 suffers from intrinsic limitations due to its architecture and running behaviour. This study introduces an innovative lightweight bogie, named 4L bogie, aimed at removing those limitations as well as improving running dynamics and track friendliness. This task was particularly challenging as the high ratio between laden and tare weight (up to 5:1) forced us to use a non-conventional suspension system and an innovative architecture of frame, reducing the mass by about 15% and the yaw moment of inertia by about 30% with respect to the Y25 bogie. Maintenance issues were addressed by reducing the number of components and easing overhaul, while the new design was validated from both the structural and the running dynamics point of view, assessing its interaction with the track in terms of stability, curving behaviour and the vertical response of the 4L bogie. Stability was improved by about 20% even in empty conditions and high conicity at the wheel/rail contact. Vertical dynamic force on a straight track, evaluated according to the Ride Force Count metric, and wear behaviour on sharp and mild curves were considerably reduced, leading to an improved track friendliness of the bogie.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信