Ivette Echeverría, R. Escalera, Oliver Saavedra, Gabriel Aliaga, Renato Montoya
{"title":"玻利维亚半干旱地区分散式污水处理厂的综合评估","authors":"Ivette Echeverría, R. Escalera, Oliver Saavedra, Gabriel Aliaga, Renato Montoya","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2024.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This study comprehensively evaluates four decentralized wastewater treatment plants intended for agricultural reuse in a semi-arid low-moderate temperature region. It considers environmental, technical, economic, and social perspectives. Anaerobic baffled reactors with hybrid gravel filters (ABR + HGF + VGF) proved the most efficient, with moderate requirements in space, O&M, and energy, albeit the highest treatment cost. Up-flow sludge blanket reactor with activated sludge (UASB + AS) demonstrated high efficiency and compactness, with moderate treatment costs. However, it incurred high energy demands, complex O&M, and more sludge generation. UASB with horizontal gravel filter (UASB + HGF) was among the most land-intensive systems, with moderate costs and O&M requirements, and low energy consumption. However, it fell short of meeting certain environmental criteria. ABR with stabilization ponds (ABR + PONDS) emerged as the most economical, with low energy consumption, but was also among the most land-intensive and failed to achieve adequate effluent quality. Socially, all WWTPs were well accepted for agricultural reuse benefits. In terms of odor perception, UASB + AS and ABR + HGF + VGF exhibit the lowest impact. The Most Appropriate Treatment Technology Index (MATTI) ranked ABR + HGF + VGF and UASB + AS as adequate technologies, while UASB + HGF and ABR + PONDS were poorly adequate. The study recommends a four-dimensional assessment for selecting the most suitable technology, considering the specific context.","PeriodicalId":104096,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice & Technology","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in semi-arid region in Bolivia\",\"authors\":\"Ivette Echeverría, R. Escalera, Oliver Saavedra, Gabriel Aliaga, Renato Montoya\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wpt.2024.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This study comprehensively evaluates four decentralized wastewater treatment plants intended for agricultural reuse in a semi-arid low-moderate temperature region. It considers environmental, technical, economic, and social perspectives. Anaerobic baffled reactors with hybrid gravel filters (ABR + HGF + VGF) proved the most efficient, with moderate requirements in space, O&M, and energy, albeit the highest treatment cost. Up-flow sludge blanket reactor with activated sludge (UASB + AS) demonstrated high efficiency and compactness, with moderate treatment costs. However, it incurred high energy demands, complex O&M, and more sludge generation. UASB with horizontal gravel filter (UASB + HGF) was among the most land-intensive systems, with moderate costs and O&M requirements, and low energy consumption. However, it fell short of meeting certain environmental criteria. ABR with stabilization ponds (ABR + PONDS) emerged as the most economical, with low energy consumption, but was also among the most land-intensive and failed to achieve adequate effluent quality. Socially, all WWTPs were well accepted for agricultural reuse benefits. In terms of odor perception, UASB + AS and ABR + HGF + VGF exhibit the lowest impact. The Most Appropriate Treatment Technology Index (MATTI) ranked ABR + HGF + VGF and UASB + AS as adequate technologies, while UASB + HGF and ABR + PONDS were poorly adequate. The study recommends a four-dimensional assessment for selecting the most suitable technology, considering the specific context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Practice & Technology\",\"volume\":\"2 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Practice & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究全面评估了半干旱低温-中温地区用于农业再利用的四座分散式污水处理厂。研究从环境、技术、经济和社会角度进行了考虑。事实证明,带混合砾石过滤器(ABR + HGF + VGF)的厌氧障板反应器效率最高,对空间、运行维护和能源的要求适中,但处理成本最高。带活性污泥的上流式污泥毯反应器(UASB + AS)效率高,结构紧凑,处理成本适中。不过,它的能耗要求高,运行和维护复杂,产生的污泥量也更多。UASB + 水平砾石过滤器(UASB + HGF)是土地密集度最高的系统之一,成本和运行维护要求适中,能耗较低。但是,它没有达到某些环境标准。带稳定塘的 ABR(ABR + PONDS)是最经济的系统,能耗低,但也是土地密集度最高的系统之一,而且无法达到适当的出水质量。在社会方面,所有污水处理厂的农业回用效益都得到了广泛认可。就臭味感知而言,UASB + AS 和 ABR + HGF + VGF 的影响最小。最合适处理技术指数 (MATTI) 将 ABR + HGF + VGF 和 UASB + AS 评为最合适的技术,而 UASB + HGF 和 ABR + PONDS 的最合适程度较低。研究建议进行四维评估,根据具体情况选择最合适的技术。
Integrated assessment of decentralized wastewater treatment plants in semi-arid region in Bolivia
This study comprehensively evaluates four decentralized wastewater treatment plants intended for agricultural reuse in a semi-arid low-moderate temperature region. It considers environmental, technical, economic, and social perspectives. Anaerobic baffled reactors with hybrid gravel filters (ABR + HGF + VGF) proved the most efficient, with moderate requirements in space, O&M, and energy, albeit the highest treatment cost. Up-flow sludge blanket reactor with activated sludge (UASB + AS) demonstrated high efficiency and compactness, with moderate treatment costs. However, it incurred high energy demands, complex O&M, and more sludge generation. UASB with horizontal gravel filter (UASB + HGF) was among the most land-intensive systems, with moderate costs and O&M requirements, and low energy consumption. However, it fell short of meeting certain environmental criteria. ABR with stabilization ponds (ABR + PONDS) emerged as the most economical, with low energy consumption, but was also among the most land-intensive and failed to achieve adequate effluent quality. Socially, all WWTPs were well accepted for agricultural reuse benefits. In terms of odor perception, UASB + AS and ABR + HGF + VGF exhibit the lowest impact. The Most Appropriate Treatment Technology Index (MATTI) ranked ABR + HGF + VGF and UASB + AS as adequate technologies, while UASB + HGF and ABR + PONDS were poorly adequate. The study recommends a four-dimensional assessment for selecting the most suitable technology, considering the specific context.