机构、社会企业家精神和个人经济福祉:一项探索性研究

Sebastian Aparicio, Magnus Klofsten, M. Noguera, David Urbano
{"title":"机构、社会企业家精神和个人经济福祉:一项探索性研究","authors":"Sebastian Aparicio, Magnus Klofsten, M. Noguera, David Urbano","doi":"10.1108/mrjiam-10-2023-1472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to evaluate the influence of institutions on the probability of becoming a social entrepreneur and the effect of this choice on individual economic well-being. The authors also analyze the effects of gender (male versus female entrepreneurism) and type (traditional versus social entrepreneurism).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nInstitutional economics framed the analysis, and hypotheses were tested using two-stage probit least squares models in a sample of 69,236 individuals from 57 countries during the 2010–2014 wave from the World Values Survey.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed that, for most variables, institutions significantly explained the probability of becoming a social entrepreneur. The analyses also indicated that social entrepreneurship is highly associated with individual economic well-being.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research brings insights into the discussion of the social and economic benefits of socially oriented entrepreneurs. Likewise, the modeling approach overcomes the interplay between entrepreneurship and economic outcomes, in which institutions become key factors.\n","PeriodicalId":514682,"journal":{"name":"Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutions, social entrepreneurship, and individual economic well-being: an exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Aparicio, Magnus Klofsten, M. Noguera, David Urbano\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mrjiam-10-2023-1472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to evaluate the influence of institutions on the probability of becoming a social entrepreneur and the effect of this choice on individual economic well-being. The authors also analyze the effects of gender (male versus female entrepreneurism) and type (traditional versus social entrepreneurism).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nInstitutional economics framed the analysis, and hypotheses were tested using two-stage probit least squares models in a sample of 69,236 individuals from 57 countries during the 2010–2014 wave from the World Values Survey.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results showed that, for most variables, institutions significantly explained the probability of becoming a social entrepreneur. The analyses also indicated that social entrepreneurship is highly associated with individual economic well-being.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research brings insights into the discussion of the social and economic benefits of socially oriented entrepreneurs. Likewise, the modeling approach overcomes the interplay between entrepreneurship and economic outcomes, in which institutions become key factors.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":514682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-10-2023-1472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-10-2023-1472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估制度对成为社会企业家概率的影响,以及这种选择对个人经济福祉的影 响。作者还分析了性别(男性创业与女性创业)和类型(传统创业与社会创业)的影响。设计/方法学/方法制度经济学为分析提供了框架,并使用两阶段 probit 最小二乘法模型对假设进行了检验,样本来自世界价值观调查 2010-2014 年期间的 57 个国家的 69 236 人。研究结果研究结果表明,对于大多数变量,制度显著解释了成为社会企业家的概率。分析还表明,社会企业家精神与个人经济福祉高度相关。同样,建模方法克服了创业与经济成果之间的相互作用,其中制度成为关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutions, social entrepreneurship, and individual economic well-being: an exploratory study
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the influence of institutions on the probability of becoming a social entrepreneur and the effect of this choice on individual economic well-being. The authors also analyze the effects of gender (male versus female entrepreneurism) and type (traditional versus social entrepreneurism). Design/methodology/approach Institutional economics framed the analysis, and hypotheses were tested using two-stage probit least squares models in a sample of 69,236 individuals from 57 countries during the 2010–2014 wave from the World Values Survey. Findings The results showed that, for most variables, institutions significantly explained the probability of becoming a social entrepreneur. The analyses also indicated that social entrepreneurship is highly associated with individual economic well-being. Originality/value This research brings insights into the discussion of the social and economic benefits of socially oriented entrepreneurs. Likewise, the modeling approach overcomes the interplay between entrepreneurship and economic outcomes, in which institutions become key factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信