D 二聚体在预测急诊科 COVID-19 患者肺栓塞中的作用

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Natalie M. Lemon MD, Luke K. Taylor MS, Megan A. Rech PharmD, MS, Quang Nguyen MS, Gregory J. Matthews PhD, George Lew MD, PhD, Shannon Lovett MD
{"title":"D 二聚体在预测急诊科 COVID-19 患者肺栓塞中的作用","authors":"Natalie M. Lemon MD,&nbsp;Luke K. Taylor MS,&nbsp;Megan A. Rech PharmD, MS,&nbsp;Quang Nguyen MS,&nbsp;Gregory J. Matthews PhD,&nbsp;George Lew MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shannon Lovett MD","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>While our understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved, uncertainty remains regarding utility of previously established pulmonary embolism (PE) screening guidelines in patients with COVID-19. Many studies have investigated the efficacy of D-dimer (DD) screenings for patients with COVID-19 admitted to inpatient services, but few have evaluated patients in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to investigate utility of DD threshold for PE screening in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the ED.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort including patients presenting to three EDs between March 1, 2020 and February 1, 2021 who tested positive for COVID-19 during ED visit or in 60 days prior to presentation and had DD ordered in ED. Patients were grouped by those who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) to evaluate for PE and those who did not, and descriptive statistics were performed. Those who underwent CTPA were further divided into PE-positive and PE-negative groups. The discriminative ability of DD in predicting PE in patients with COVID-19 was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 570 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study, of which 107 underwent CTPA to evaluate for PE. History of diabetes, elevated glucose, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, elevated white blood cell count, elevated platelets, elevated respiratory rate, and lower temperature were associated with increased risk for PE. Compared to those without PE, patients with PE were significantly more likely to be hospitalized (100% vs. 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.020) and admitted to the ICU (64% vs. 24%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Those with PE had a significantly higher median DD value (21,177 ng/mL) compared to PE-negative group (952 ng/mL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The ROC curve for DD in predicting PE had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [0.84, 0.98]). In our study population, the optimal DD threshold for predicting PE was 1815 ng/mL (sensitivity 93% and specificity 80%). A conservative threshold of 1089 ng/mL could be used with sensitivity 100% and specificity 58%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>DD is often elevated in patients with COVID-19, regardless of PE. While the classically used DD cutoff is 500 ng/mL, our study demonstrated a threshold of 1089 ng/mL safely predicted PE in patients with COVID-19 .</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Natalie M. Lemon MD,&nbsp;Luke K. Taylor MS,&nbsp;Megan A. Rech PharmD, MS,&nbsp;Quang Nguyen MS,&nbsp;Gregory J. Matthews PhD,&nbsp;George Lew MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shannon Lovett MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/emp2.13237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>While our understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved, uncertainty remains regarding utility of previously established pulmonary embolism (PE) screening guidelines in patients with COVID-19. Many studies have investigated the efficacy of D-dimer (DD) screenings for patients with COVID-19 admitted to inpatient services, but few have evaluated patients in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to investigate utility of DD threshold for PE screening in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the ED.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort including patients presenting to three EDs between March 1, 2020 and February 1, 2021 who tested positive for COVID-19 during ED visit or in 60 days prior to presentation and had DD ordered in ED. Patients were grouped by those who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) to evaluate for PE and those who did not, and descriptive statistics were performed. Those who underwent CTPA were further divided into PE-positive and PE-negative groups. The discriminative ability of DD in predicting PE in patients with COVID-19 was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 570 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study, of which 107 underwent CTPA to evaluate for PE. History of diabetes, elevated glucose, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, elevated white blood cell count, elevated platelets, elevated respiratory rate, and lower temperature were associated with increased risk for PE. Compared to those without PE, patients with PE were significantly more likely to be hospitalized (100% vs. 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.020) and admitted to the ICU (64% vs. 24%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Those with PE had a significantly higher median DD value (21,177 ng/mL) compared to PE-negative group (952 ng/mL, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The ROC curve for DD in predicting PE had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [0.84, 0.98]). In our study population, the optimal DD threshold for predicting PE was 1815 ng/mL (sensitivity 93% and specificity 80%). A conservative threshold of 1089 ng/mL could be used with sensitivity 100% and specificity 58%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>DD is often elevated in patients with COVID-19, regardless of PE. While the classically used DD cutoff is 500 ng/mL, our study demonstrated a threshold of 1089 ng/mL safely predicted PE in patients with COVID-19 .</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13237\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 虽然我们对冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的了解不断深入,但之前制定的肺栓塞(PE)筛查指南对 COVID-19 患者是否有用仍存在不确定性。许多研究都对住院治疗的 COVID-19 患者进行 D-二聚体(DD)筛查的效果进行了调查,但很少有研究对急诊科(ED)患者进行评估。本研究旨在调查 DD 临界值对急诊科 COVID-19 患者进行 PE 筛查的效用。 方法 这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究,包括 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 2 月 1 日期间在三家急诊科就诊的患者,这些患者在急诊科就诊期间或就诊前 60 天内 COVID-19 检测呈阳性,且急诊科开具了 DD 订单。按照接受计算机断层扫描肺血管造影(CTPA)以评估 PE 的患者和未接受 CTPA 的患者进行分组,并进行描述性统计。接受 CTPA 检查的患者又分为 PE 阳性组和 PE 阴性组。使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析了 DD 预测 COVID-19 患者 PE 的鉴别能力。 结果 共纳入 570 例 COVID-19 患者,其中 107 例接受了 CTPA 评估 PE。糖尿病史、血糖升高、乳酸脱氢酶升高、白细胞计数升高、血小板升高、呼吸频率升高和体温降低与 PE 风险增加有关。与无 PE 患者相比,PE 患者住院(100% 对 82%,P = 0.020)和入住重症监护室(64% 对 24%,P = 0.002)的几率明显更高。与 PE 阴性组(952 ng/mL,p <0.001)相比,PE 阳性组的 DD 中位值(21,177 ng/mL)明显更高。DD预测PE的ROC曲线下面积为0.91(95%置信区间[0.84, 0.98])。在我们的研究人群中,预测 PE 的最佳 DD 阈值为 1815 ng/mL(灵敏度 93%,特异度 80%)。保守的阈值为 1089 ng/mL,灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 58%。 结论 COVID-19 患者的 DD 常常升高,与 PE 无关。虽然经典的 DD 临界值是 500 毫微克/毫升,但我们的研究表明,1089 毫微克/毫升的临界值可安全预测 COVID-19 患者的 PE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Utility of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department

Utility of D-dimer in predicting pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the emergency department

Objectives

While our understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved, uncertainty remains regarding utility of previously established pulmonary embolism (PE) screening guidelines in patients with COVID-19. Many studies have investigated the efficacy of D-dimer (DD) screenings for patients with COVID-19 admitted to inpatient services, but few have evaluated patients in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to investigate utility of DD threshold for PE screening in patients with COVID-19 presenting to the ED.

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort including patients presenting to three EDs between March 1, 2020 and February 1, 2021 who tested positive for COVID-19 during ED visit or in 60 days prior to presentation and had DD ordered in ED. Patients were grouped by those who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) to evaluate for PE and those who did not, and descriptive statistics were performed. Those who underwent CTPA were further divided into PE-positive and PE-negative groups. The discriminative ability of DD in predicting PE in patients with COVID-19 was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

A total of 570 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study, of which 107 underwent CTPA to evaluate for PE. History of diabetes, elevated glucose, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, elevated white blood cell count, elevated platelets, elevated respiratory rate, and lower temperature were associated with increased risk for PE. Compared to those without PE, patients with PE were significantly more likely to be hospitalized (100% vs. 82%, p = 0.020) and admitted to the ICU (64% vs. 24%, p = 0.002). Those with PE had a significantly higher median DD value (21,177 ng/mL) compared to PE-negative group (952 ng/mL, p < 0.001). The ROC curve for DD in predicting PE had an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [0.84, 0.98]). In our study population, the optimal DD threshold for predicting PE was 1815 ng/mL (sensitivity 93% and specificity 80%). A conservative threshold of 1089 ng/mL could be used with sensitivity 100% and specificity 58%.

Conclusion

DD is often elevated in patients with COVID-19, regardless of PE. While the classically used DD cutoff is 500 ng/mL, our study demonstrated a threshold of 1089 ng/mL safely predicted PE in patients with COVID-19 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信