困难胆道插管中的预切技术组合。

Azar Abiyev, Barış Tuzcu, Gülden Bilican, Harun Küçük, Serkan Dumanlı, Seçkin Özgül, Mustafa Ergin, Güner Kılıç, Ali Karataş, Murat Kekilli
{"title":"困难胆道插管中的预切技术组合。","authors":"Azar Abiyev, Barış Tuzcu, Gülden Bilican, Harun Küçük, Serkan Dumanlı, Seçkin Özgül, Mustafa Ergin, Güner Kılıç, Ali Karataş, Murat Kekilli","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is a prerequisite for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). SBC has the potential to fail in as many as 20% of cases, even with skilled endoscopists. Precut incision techniques like needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) and transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) can be used in cases where standard cannulation techniques fail. However, these precut techniques may also fail in some cases. We aimed to evaluate the procedural success of the combined TPS + NKS technique in difficult biliary cannulation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included 289 patients who underwent ERCP with precut techniques from 2017 to 2022. Patients were classified into the following three groups and evaluated retrospectively in terms of cannulation success, and ERCP-related adverse effects: Transpancreatic septotomy, NKS, and TPS + NKS; statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), version 29.0, software was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of SBC was 69% in the TPS group, 75.3% in the NCS group, and 87% in the TPS + NCS group. There was no significant difference between the NKS and TPS + NKS groups. Cannulation success in both NKS group and NKS + TPS groups was significantly higher than in the TPS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Complication rates were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases where standard sphincterotomy and precut techniques fail, a second precut technique can be used. A previous TPS does not prevent NKS.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Abiyev A, Tuzcu B, Bilican G, <i>et al</i>. Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):56-59.</p>","PeriodicalId":516317,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"14 1","pages":"56-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation.\",\"authors\":\"Azar Abiyev, Barış Tuzcu, Gülden Bilican, Harun Küçük, Serkan Dumanlı, Seçkin Özgül, Mustafa Ergin, Güner Kılıç, Ali Karataş, Murat Kekilli\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is a prerequisite for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). SBC has the potential to fail in as many as 20% of cases, even with skilled endoscopists. Precut incision techniques like needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) and transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) can be used in cases where standard cannulation techniques fail. However, these precut techniques may also fail in some cases. We aimed to evaluate the procedural success of the combined TPS + NKS technique in difficult biliary cannulation.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included 289 patients who underwent ERCP with precut techniques from 2017 to 2022. Patients were classified into the following three groups and evaluated retrospectively in terms of cannulation success, and ERCP-related adverse effects: Transpancreatic septotomy, NKS, and TPS + NKS; statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), version 29.0, software was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of SBC was 69% in the TPS group, 75.3% in the NCS group, and 87% in the TPS + NCS group. There was no significant difference between the NKS and TPS + NKS groups. Cannulation success in both NKS group and NKS + TPS groups was significantly higher than in the TPS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Complication rates were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases where standard sphincterotomy and precut techniques fail, a second precut technique can be used. A previous TPS does not prevent NKS.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Abiyev A, Tuzcu B, Bilican G, <i>et al</i>. Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):56-59.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"56-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择性胆道插管(SBC)是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)成功的先决条件。即使内镜医师技术娴熟,多达 20% 的病例仍有可能导致 SBC 失败。针刀括约肌切开术(NKS)和经胰管隔膜切开术(TPS)等预切开技术可用于标准插管技术失败的病例。然而,这些预切开技术在某些情况下也可能失败。我们旨在评估 TPS + NKS 联合技术在困难胆道插管手术中的成功率:研究纳入了2017年至2022年期间接受ERCP的289名患者,这些患者均采用了预切技术。患者被分为以下三组,并就插管成功率和ERCP相关不良反应进行回顾性评估:经胰腺隔绝术、NKS和TPS + NKS;使用29.0版社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)分析数据:TPS 组 SBC 成功率为 69%,NCS 组为 75.3%,TPS + NCS 组为 87%。NKS 组和 TPS + NKS 组之间没有明显差异。NKS 组和 NKS + TPS 组的插管成功率明显高于 TPS 组(P < 0.001)。并发症发生率相似:结论:在标准括约肌切开术和预切开技术失败的情况下,可以使用第二种预切开技术。如何引用本文:阿比耶夫(Abiyev A)、图兹库(Tuzcu B)、比利坎(Bilican G)等:困难胆道插管中的预切技术组合。Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024; 14(1):56-59.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation.

Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation.

Background: Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is a prerequisite for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). SBC has the potential to fail in as many as 20% of cases, even with skilled endoscopists. Precut incision techniques like needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) and transpancreatic septotomy (TPS) can be used in cases where standard cannulation techniques fail. However, these precut techniques may also fail in some cases. We aimed to evaluate the procedural success of the combined TPS + NKS technique in difficult biliary cannulation.

Patients and methods: The study included 289 patients who underwent ERCP with precut techniques from 2017 to 2022. Patients were classified into the following three groups and evaluated retrospectively in terms of cannulation success, and ERCP-related adverse effects: Transpancreatic septotomy, NKS, and TPS + NKS; statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), version 29.0, software was used to analyze the data.

Results: The success rate of SBC was 69% in the TPS group, 75.3% in the NCS group, and 87% in the TPS + NCS group. There was no significant difference between the NKS and TPS + NKS groups. Cannulation success in both NKS group and NKS + TPS groups was significantly higher than in the TPS group (p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar.

Conclusion: In cases where standard sphincterotomy and precut techniques fail, a second precut technique can be used. A previous TPS does not prevent NKS.

How to cite this article: Abiyev A, Tuzcu B, Bilican G, et al. Combination of Precut Techniques in Difficult Biliary Cannulation. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):56-59.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信