体外比较钛盘表面粗糙度和使用三种不同吸头进行超声波器械操作后的细菌定植情况

Aleksandr Kitaygorodskiy, Richard L Gregory, Glendale Lim, Yusuke Hamada
{"title":"体外比较钛盘表面粗糙度和使用三种不同吸头进行超声波器械操作后的细菌定植情况","authors":"Aleksandr Kitaygorodskiy, Richard L Gregory, Glendale Lim, Yusuke Hamada","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During implant maintenance, preserving a smooth surface on the machined transmucosal abutment is critical to reduce biofilm attachment and colonization. The present study compared the surface roughness and bacterial colonization of machined titanium surfaces after instrumentation with various materials. Forty-four machined grade 23 titanium discs were instrumented with a round polyether ether ketone (PEEK) tip, a plastic curette tip, or a pure titanium curette tip with piezoelectric devices. Before and after instrumentation, the surface roughness (Ra and Rz) values were analyzed with a profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Streptococcus sanguinis was cultured and incubated for 24 hours on the instrumented discs, and colony-forming units per milliliter were obtained for each group. Samples instrumented with the metal ultrasonic tip significantly increased surface roughness compared with the other groups. This resulted in greater colonization by S. sanguinis than surfaces instrumented with PEEK tips or the negative control. Samples instrumented with PEEK and plastic tips did not exhibit any statistically significant increase in surface roughness, and SEM analysis revealed a significantly rougher surface of discs instrumented with metal compared with discs instrumented with plastic or PEEK tips despite the possibility of debris from tip dissolution. Our results suggest that instrumentation with metal ultrasonic tips with piezoelectric devices significantly increased machined titanium's surface roughness and elicited higher biofilm formation in vitro. Meanwhile, instrumentation of machined titanium with PEEK or plastic ultrasonic tips did not affect the surface roughness or bacterial adhesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":"537-543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandr Kitaygorodskiy, Richard L Gregory, Glendale Lim, Yusuke Hamada\",\"doi\":\"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During implant maintenance, preserving a smooth surface on the machined transmucosal abutment is critical to reduce biofilm attachment and colonization. The present study compared the surface roughness and bacterial colonization of machined titanium surfaces after instrumentation with various materials. Forty-four machined grade 23 titanium discs were instrumented with a round polyether ether ketone (PEEK) tip, a plastic curette tip, or a pure titanium curette tip with piezoelectric devices. Before and after instrumentation, the surface roughness (Ra and Rz) values were analyzed with a profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Streptococcus sanguinis was cultured and incubated for 24 hours on the instrumented discs, and colony-forming units per milliliter were obtained for each group. Samples instrumented with the metal ultrasonic tip significantly increased surface roughness compared with the other groups. This resulted in greater colonization by S. sanguinis than surfaces instrumented with PEEK tips or the negative control. Samples instrumented with PEEK and plastic tips did not exhibit any statistically significant increase in surface roughness, and SEM analysis revealed a significantly rougher surface of discs instrumented with metal compared with discs instrumented with plastic or PEEK tips despite the possibility of debris from tip dissolution. Our results suggest that instrumentation with metal ultrasonic tips with piezoelectric devices significantly increased machined titanium's surface roughness and elicited higher biofilm formation in vitro. Meanwhile, instrumentation of machined titanium with PEEK or plastic ultrasonic tips did not affect the surface roughness or bacterial adhesion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of oral implantology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"537-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of oral implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在种植体维护过程中,保持经黏膜基台加工表面的光滑对于减少生物膜的附着和定植至关重要。本研究比较了使用不同材料的器械加工后钛金属表面的粗糙度和细菌定植情况。用圆形聚醚醚酮 (PEEK) 尖端、塑料刮匙或带有压电装置的纯钛刮匙对 44 个加工过的 23 级钛盘进行了器械检查。在使用仪器前后,用轮廓仪和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析了表面粗糙度(Ra 和 Rz)值。培养血链球菌并在带仪器的圆片上培养 24 小时,得出每组的菌落形成单位(CFU)/毫升。与其他组相比,使用金属超声波探头的样品表面粗糙度明显增加。与使用 PEEK 超声波探头的样品或阴性对照组相比,金属超声波探头的样品表面粗糙度明显增加,从而导致更多的血吸虫菌落。使用 PEEK 和塑料喷嘴的样品表面粗糙度在统计上没有明显增加。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析表明,与使用塑料或 PEEK 吸头的圆盘相比,使用金属吸头的圆盘表面明显更粗糙,尽管吸头溶解可能会产生碎屑。我们的研究结果表明,使用带有压电装置的金属超声波探头会显著增加加工钛的表面粗糙度,并在体外诱发更高的生物膜形成。同时,使用 PEEK 或塑料超声波探头对加工过的钛进行检测不会影响表面粗糙度或细菌附着力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips.

During implant maintenance, preserving a smooth surface on the machined transmucosal abutment is critical to reduce biofilm attachment and colonization. The present study compared the surface roughness and bacterial colonization of machined titanium surfaces after instrumentation with various materials. Forty-four machined grade 23 titanium discs were instrumented with a round polyether ether ketone (PEEK) tip, a plastic curette tip, or a pure titanium curette tip with piezoelectric devices. Before and after instrumentation, the surface roughness (Ra and Rz) values were analyzed with a profilometer and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Streptococcus sanguinis was cultured and incubated for 24 hours on the instrumented discs, and colony-forming units per milliliter were obtained for each group. Samples instrumented with the metal ultrasonic tip significantly increased surface roughness compared with the other groups. This resulted in greater colonization by S. sanguinis than surfaces instrumented with PEEK tips or the negative control. Samples instrumented with PEEK and plastic tips did not exhibit any statistically significant increase in surface roughness, and SEM analysis revealed a significantly rougher surface of discs instrumented with metal compared with discs instrumented with plastic or PEEK tips despite the possibility of debris from tip dissolution. Our results suggest that instrumentation with metal ultrasonic tips with piezoelectric devices significantly increased machined titanium's surface roughness and elicited higher biofilm formation in vitro. Meanwhile, instrumentation of machined titanium with PEEK or plastic ultrasonic tips did not affect the surface roughness or bacterial adhesion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信