讨论预测胎儿性别的性别和性别包容方法:呼吁反思与研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Hannah Llorin MS, CGC, Tiffany Lundeen CNM, MSN, Elizabeth Collins MD, MPH, Claudia Geist PhD, Kyl Myers PhD, MS, Susanna R. Cohen CNM, DNP, Kimberly Zayhowski MS, CGC
{"title":"讨论预测胎儿性别的性别和性别包容方法:呼吁反思与研究。","authors":"Hannah Llorin MS, CGC,&nbsp;Tiffany Lundeen CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Elizabeth Collins MD, MPH,&nbsp;Claudia Geist PhD,&nbsp;Kyl Myers PhD, MS,&nbsp;Susanna R. Cohen CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Kimberly Zayhowski MS, CGC","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technology has rapidly transformed the centuries-old practice of fetal sex prediction, and significant social and medical progress is changing the way prenatal health care providers (HCPs) address the often-asked question, “Am I having a boy or a girl?” Access to prenatal cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening is expanding broadly, and medical societies recommend cfDNA screening for all pregnancies.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Prenatal cfDNA screening offers sex chromosome assessment for sex chromosome aneuploidy (sex chromosome complements other than XX or XY), along with other aneuploidy screening (for trisomies 13, 18, and 21), as early as 10 weeks’ gestation. Patients may have a limited understanding of the prevalence of aneuploidy in the general population, the implications of these differences, and the purpose of screening for them. This gap in understanding could lead patients to believe the test is solely about gender determination.</p><p>There is increased awareness that gender and sex diversity are essential components of health, health care, and social reality.<span><sup>3</sup></span> In this commentary, we posit that many prenatal HCPs are currently underprepared to talk to parents about fetal sex prediction and sex chromosome variation during the course of prenatal care in a manner that is accurate and inclusive of gender and sex diversity, which would promote family function and individual well-being for gender- and sex-diverse children and adults. This skill is relevant to midwives, nurses, genetic counselors, physicians, physician associates, radiologists, and radiology technicians. Of note, in this commentary, we have largely chosen to use the term <i>parents</i> to align with the focus on childhood gender socialization, presupposing a context of desired pregnancies leading to birth and parenting.</p><p>When prenatal HCPs tell patients, “It's a girl!” or “It's a boy!” they reinforce an erroneous bioessentialist framework: people with XX chromosomes or an apparent vulva are assigned female and socialized as girls, and people with XY chromosomes or an apparent penis are assigned male and socialized as boys. (See Table 1 for relevant terms and definitions.) However, a person's own construct of gender identity is the result of interactions between biological and social factors and relies on cognitive development across the life span. Misconceptions about both sex and gender that are often enacted during the prenatal period among HCPs and pregnant people include: (1) sex and gender are determined by sex chromosomes alone, (2) a person's sex chromosomes can only be XX or XY, and that sex is strictly binary, and (3) there are only 2 gender categories: boy or girl.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> These incorrect assumptions jeopardize the child's autonomy<span><sup>6</sup></span> and contribute to the inflexible binary social model and dimorphic biological model that underlie bigotry, erasure, phobias, and discrimination against gender-diverse and sex-diverse people.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Structural medical and social discrimination against transgender individuals is reflected in persistent health disparities.<span><sup>8</sup></span> Furthermore, individuals with variations of sex characteristics and chromosomes are subject to the pathologization of benign variations, resulting in unnecessary nonconsensual medical procedures and trauma.<span><sup>9</sup></span> In the following sections, we outline key questions that need further exploration and research.</p><p>This commentary raises important questions and presents suggestions for promoting gender-expansive and intersex-inclusive perspectives when discussing fetal sex prediction during pregnancy. Prenatal HCPs and their care teams can play an important role in normalizing positive attitudes toward sex-diverse and gender-diverse children. We call for additional implementation research, clinical quality improvement, and health care systems change that (1) create inclusive and affirming prenatal care environments, (2) enhance support for gender-diverse and sex-diverse people, and (3) prioritize initiatives led by members of gender-diverse and sex-diverse communities.</p><p>Hannah Llorin is a recent employee and equity holder of 23andMe. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.</p>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"69 6","pages":"821-825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender and Sex Inclusive Approaches for Discussing Predicted Fetal Sex: A Call for Reflection and Research\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Llorin MS, CGC,&nbsp;Tiffany Lundeen CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Elizabeth Collins MD, MPH,&nbsp;Claudia Geist PhD,&nbsp;Kyl Myers PhD, MS,&nbsp;Susanna R. Cohen CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Kimberly Zayhowski MS, CGC\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Technology has rapidly transformed the centuries-old practice of fetal sex prediction, and significant social and medical progress is changing the way prenatal health care providers (HCPs) address the often-asked question, “Am I having a boy or a girl?” Access to prenatal cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening is expanding broadly, and medical societies recommend cfDNA screening for all pregnancies.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Prenatal cfDNA screening offers sex chromosome assessment for sex chromosome aneuploidy (sex chromosome complements other than XX or XY), along with other aneuploidy screening (for trisomies 13, 18, and 21), as early as 10 weeks’ gestation. Patients may have a limited understanding of the prevalence of aneuploidy in the general population, the implications of these differences, and the purpose of screening for them. This gap in understanding could lead patients to believe the test is solely about gender determination.</p><p>There is increased awareness that gender and sex diversity are essential components of health, health care, and social reality.<span><sup>3</sup></span> In this commentary, we posit that many prenatal HCPs are currently underprepared to talk to parents about fetal sex prediction and sex chromosome variation during the course of prenatal care in a manner that is accurate and inclusive of gender and sex diversity, which would promote family function and individual well-being for gender- and sex-diverse children and adults. This skill is relevant to midwives, nurses, genetic counselors, physicians, physician associates, radiologists, and radiology technicians. Of note, in this commentary, we have largely chosen to use the term <i>parents</i> to align with the focus on childhood gender socialization, presupposing a context of desired pregnancies leading to birth and parenting.</p><p>When prenatal HCPs tell patients, “It's a girl!” or “It's a boy!” they reinforce an erroneous bioessentialist framework: people with XX chromosomes or an apparent vulva are assigned female and socialized as girls, and people with XY chromosomes or an apparent penis are assigned male and socialized as boys. (See Table 1 for relevant terms and definitions.) However, a person's own construct of gender identity is the result of interactions between biological and social factors and relies on cognitive development across the life span. Misconceptions about both sex and gender that are often enacted during the prenatal period among HCPs and pregnant people include: (1) sex and gender are determined by sex chromosomes alone, (2) a person's sex chromosomes can only be XX or XY, and that sex is strictly binary, and (3) there are only 2 gender categories: boy or girl.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> These incorrect assumptions jeopardize the child's autonomy<span><sup>6</sup></span> and contribute to the inflexible binary social model and dimorphic biological model that underlie bigotry, erasure, phobias, and discrimination against gender-diverse and sex-diverse people.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Structural medical and social discrimination against transgender individuals is reflected in persistent health disparities.<span><sup>8</sup></span> Furthermore, individuals with variations of sex characteristics and chromosomes are subject to the pathologization of benign variations, resulting in unnecessary nonconsensual medical procedures and trauma.<span><sup>9</sup></span> In the following sections, we outline key questions that need further exploration and research.</p><p>This commentary raises important questions and presents suggestions for promoting gender-expansive and intersex-inclusive perspectives when discussing fetal sex prediction during pregnancy. Prenatal HCPs and their care teams can play an important role in normalizing positive attitudes toward sex-diverse and gender-diverse children. We call for additional implementation research, clinical quality improvement, and health care systems change that (1) create inclusive and affirming prenatal care environments, (2) enhance support for gender-diverse and sex-diverse people, and (3) prioritize initiatives led by members of gender-diverse and sex-diverse communities.</p><p>Hannah Llorin is a recent employee and equity holder of 23andMe. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"821-825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术已经迅速改变了几个世纪以来胎儿性别预测的做法,重大的社会和医学进步正在改变产前保健提供者(HCPs)解决经常被问到的问题的方式,“我怀的是男孩还是女孩?”产前无细胞胎儿DNA (cfDNA)筛查正在广泛扩大,医学协会建议对所有妊娠进行cfDNA筛查。产前cfDNA筛查提供性染色体非整倍体(除XX或XY以外的性染色体互补体)的性染色体评估,以及其他非整倍体筛查(13、18和21三体),早在妊娠10周。患者可能对非整倍体在普通人群中的患病率、这些差异的含义以及筛查的目的了解有限。这种理解上的差距可能会导致患者认为这项测试仅仅是为了确定性别。人们日益认识到,性别和性别多样性是健康、保健和社会现实的重要组成部分在这篇评论中,我们认为许多产前保健师目前还没有准备好在产前护理过程中以准确和包容性别和性别多样性的方式与父母谈论胎儿性别预测和性染色体变异,这将促进性别和性别多样化的儿童和成人的家庭功能和个人福祉。这项技能与助产士、护士、遗传咨询师、医生、医师助理、放射科医生和放射技术人员有关。值得注意的是,在这篇评论中,我们在很大程度上选择了使用“父母”一词,以配合对儿童性别社会化的关注,预设了期望怀孕导致生育和养育子女的背景。当产前医护人员告诉病人:“是个女孩!或“是个男孩!”它们强化了一种错误的生物本质主义框架:拥有XX染色体或明显外阴的人被指定为女性,并被社会化为女孩,而拥有XY染色体或明显阴茎的人被指定为男性,并被社会化为男孩。(相关术语和定义见表1)然而,一个人自身的性别认同建构是生物和社会因素相互作用的结果,并依赖于整个生命周期的认知发展。在产前期间,HCPs和孕妇经常对性和性别产生误解,包括:(1)性和性别仅由性染色体决定,(2)一个人的性染色体只能是XX或XY,并且性别是严格的二元性,(3)只有两种性别类别:男孩或女孩。这些不正确的假设危害了儿童的自主性,助长了僵化的二元社会模式和二元生物模式,这些模式是偏见、排斥、恐惧和歧视性别差异者和性别差异者的基础7 .对变性人的结构性医疗和社会歧视反映在持续存在的健康差异上此外,具有性别特征和染色体变异的个体容易出现良性变异的病理化,从而导致不必要的非自愿医疗程序和创伤在接下来的章节中,我们将概述需要进一步探索和研究的关键问题。这篇评论提出了重要的问题,并提出了在讨论怀孕期间胎儿性别预测时促进性别膨胀和双性人包容观点的建议。产前卫生保健人员及其护理团队可以在使对性别多样化和性别多样化儿童的积极态度正常化方面发挥重要作用。我们呼吁更多的实施研究、临床质量改进和医疗保健系统变革,以(1)创造包容和肯定的产前护理环境,(2)加强对性别多样化和性别多样化人群的支持,以及(3)优先考虑由性别多样化和性别多样化社区成员领导的倡议。Hannah Llorin是23andMe最近的雇员和股东。其余作者没有任何利益冲突需要披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender and Sex Inclusive Approaches for Discussing Predicted Fetal Sex: A Call for Reflection and Research

Technology has rapidly transformed the centuries-old practice of fetal sex prediction, and significant social and medical progress is changing the way prenatal health care providers (HCPs) address the often-asked question, “Am I having a boy or a girl?” Access to prenatal cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) screening is expanding broadly, and medical societies recommend cfDNA screening for all pregnancies.1, 2 Prenatal cfDNA screening offers sex chromosome assessment for sex chromosome aneuploidy (sex chromosome complements other than XX or XY), along with other aneuploidy screening (for trisomies 13, 18, and 21), as early as 10 weeks’ gestation. Patients may have a limited understanding of the prevalence of aneuploidy in the general population, the implications of these differences, and the purpose of screening for them. This gap in understanding could lead patients to believe the test is solely about gender determination.

There is increased awareness that gender and sex diversity are essential components of health, health care, and social reality.3 In this commentary, we posit that many prenatal HCPs are currently underprepared to talk to parents about fetal sex prediction and sex chromosome variation during the course of prenatal care in a manner that is accurate and inclusive of gender and sex diversity, which would promote family function and individual well-being for gender- and sex-diverse children and adults. This skill is relevant to midwives, nurses, genetic counselors, physicians, physician associates, radiologists, and radiology technicians. Of note, in this commentary, we have largely chosen to use the term parents to align with the focus on childhood gender socialization, presupposing a context of desired pregnancies leading to birth and parenting.

When prenatal HCPs tell patients, “It's a girl!” or “It's a boy!” they reinforce an erroneous bioessentialist framework: people with XX chromosomes or an apparent vulva are assigned female and socialized as girls, and people with XY chromosomes or an apparent penis are assigned male and socialized as boys. (See Table 1 for relevant terms and definitions.) However, a person's own construct of gender identity is the result of interactions between biological and social factors and relies on cognitive development across the life span. Misconceptions about both sex and gender that are often enacted during the prenatal period among HCPs and pregnant people include: (1) sex and gender are determined by sex chromosomes alone, (2) a person's sex chromosomes can only be XX or XY, and that sex is strictly binary, and (3) there are only 2 gender categories: boy or girl.4, 5 These incorrect assumptions jeopardize the child's autonomy6 and contribute to the inflexible binary social model and dimorphic biological model that underlie bigotry, erasure, phobias, and discrimination against gender-diverse and sex-diverse people.7 Structural medical and social discrimination against transgender individuals is reflected in persistent health disparities.8 Furthermore, individuals with variations of sex characteristics and chromosomes are subject to the pathologization of benign variations, resulting in unnecessary nonconsensual medical procedures and trauma.9 In the following sections, we outline key questions that need further exploration and research.

This commentary raises important questions and presents suggestions for promoting gender-expansive and intersex-inclusive perspectives when discussing fetal sex prediction during pregnancy. Prenatal HCPs and their care teams can play an important role in normalizing positive attitudes toward sex-diverse and gender-diverse children. We call for additional implementation research, clinical quality improvement, and health care systems change that (1) create inclusive and affirming prenatal care environments, (2) enhance support for gender-diverse and sex-diverse people, and (3) prioritize initiatives led by members of gender-diverse and sex-diverse communities.

Hannah Llorin is a recent employee and equity holder of 23andMe. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信