非随机纵向差异研究的简单功率和样本量估算。

Journal of biometrics & biostatistics Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-26
Yirui Hu, D R Hoover
{"title":"非随机纵向差异研究的简单功率和样本量估算。","authors":"Yirui Hu, D R Hoover","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intervention effects on continuous longitudinal normal outcomes are often estimated in two-arm pre-post interventional studies with b≥1 pre- and k≥1 post-intervention measures using \"Difference-in-Differences\" (DD) analysis. Although randomization is preferred, non-randomized designs are often necessary due to practical constraints. Power/sample size estimation methods for non-randomized DD designs that incorporate the correlation structure of repeated measures are needed. We derive Generalized Least Squares (GLS) variance estimate of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry (CS) correlation structure (where the correlation between all repeated measures is a constant<i>ρ</i>) this leads to simple power and sample size estimation formulas that can be implemented using pencil and paper. Given a constrained number of total timepoints (T), having as close to possible equal number of pre-and post-intervention timepoints (b=k) achieves greatest power. When planning a study with 7 or less timepoints, given large <i>ρ</i>(<i>ρ</i>≥0.6) in multiple baseline measures (b≥2) or <i>ρ</i>≥0.8 in a single baseline setting, the improvement in power from a randomized versus non-randomized DD design may be minor. Extensions to cluster study designs and incorporation of time invariant covariates are given. Applications to study planning are illustrated using three real examples with T=4 timepoints and <i>ρ</i> ranging from 0.55 to 0.75.</p>","PeriodicalId":87294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simple Power and Sample Size Estimation for Non-Randomized Longitudinal Difference in Differences Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Yirui Hu, D R Hoover\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intervention effects on continuous longitudinal normal outcomes are often estimated in two-arm pre-post interventional studies with b≥1 pre- and k≥1 post-intervention measures using \\\"Difference-in-Differences\\\" (DD) analysis. Although randomization is preferred, non-randomized designs are often necessary due to practical constraints. Power/sample size estimation methods for non-randomized DD designs that incorporate the correlation structure of repeated measures are needed. We derive Generalized Least Squares (GLS) variance estimate of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry (CS) correlation structure (where the correlation between all repeated measures is a constant<i>ρ</i>) this leads to simple power and sample size estimation formulas that can be implemented using pencil and paper. Given a constrained number of total timepoints (T), having as close to possible equal number of pre-and post-intervention timepoints (b=k) achieves greatest power. When planning a study with 7 or less timepoints, given large <i>ρ</i>(<i>ρ</i>≥0.6) in multiple baseline measures (b≥2) or <i>ρ</i>≥0.8 in a single baseline setting, the improvement in power from a randomized versus non-randomized DD design may be minor. Extensions to cluster study designs and incorporation of time invariant covariates are given. Applications to study planning are illustrated using three real examples with T=4 timepoints and <i>ρ</i> ranging from 0.55 to 0.75.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6663085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对连续性纵向正常结果的干预效果,通常是通过 "差异分析"(DD),在干预前 b≥1 和干预后 k≥1 的两臂前后干预研究中估算出来的。虽然随机化是首选,但由于实际条件的限制,非随机化设计往往是必要的。非随机 DD 设计的功率/样本量估计方法需要结合重复测量的相关结构。我们推导了干预效应的广义最小二乘法(GLS)方差估计。对于通常假定的复合对称(CS)相关结构(即所有重复测量之间的相关性为常数ρ),这将带来简单的功率和样本量估计公式,可以用纸笔实现。在总时间点(T)数量有限的情况下,干预前和干预后的时间点数量尽可能相等(b=k)可获得最大的功率。当计划进行一项时间点为 7 个或更少的研究时,考虑到多个基线测量中的大ρ(ρ≥0.6)(b≥2)或单一基线设置中的ρ≥0.8,随机 DD 设计相对于非随机 DD 设计在功率方面的改善可能较小。该方法还可扩展到群组研究设计,并纳入时间不变协变量。通过三个时间点 T=4 和 ρ 在 0.55 到 0.75 之间的实际例子,说明了研究规划的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simple Power and Sample Size Estimation for Non-Randomized Longitudinal Difference in Differences Studies.

Intervention effects on continuous longitudinal normal outcomes are often estimated in two-arm pre-post interventional studies with b≥1 pre- and k≥1 post-intervention measures using "Difference-in-Differences" (DD) analysis. Although randomization is preferred, non-randomized designs are often necessary due to practical constraints. Power/sample size estimation methods for non-randomized DD designs that incorporate the correlation structure of repeated measures are needed. We derive Generalized Least Squares (GLS) variance estimate of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry (CS) correlation structure (where the correlation between all repeated measures is a constantρ) this leads to simple power and sample size estimation formulas that can be implemented using pencil and paper. Given a constrained number of total timepoints (T), having as close to possible equal number of pre-and post-intervention timepoints (b=k) achieves greatest power. When planning a study with 7 or less timepoints, given large ρ(ρ≥0.6) in multiple baseline measures (b≥2) or ρ≥0.8 in a single baseline setting, the improvement in power from a randomized versus non-randomized DD design may be minor. Extensions to cluster study designs and incorporation of time invariant covariates are given. Applications to study planning are illustrated using three real examples with T=4 timepoints and ρ ranging from 0.55 to 0.75.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信