单栓与多栓骨软骨异体移植治疗膝关节骨软骨缺损的初步疗效:匹配队列分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2368-4253
Julia S Retzky, Francesca R Coxe, Brittany Ammerman, Ava G Neijna, Paige Hinkley, Andreas H Gomoll, Sabrina M Strickland
{"title":"单栓与多栓骨软骨异体移植治疗膝关节骨软骨缺损的初步疗效:匹配队列分析。","authors":"Julia S Retzky, Francesca R Coxe, Brittany Ammerman, Ava G Neijna, Paige Hinkley, Andreas H Gomoll, Sabrina M Strickland","doi":"10.1055/a-2368-4253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although several prior studies have described the outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for single osteochondral lesions, there is a paucity of comparative data on outcomes of single versus multiple OCA transplants. We aimed to describe the initial outcomes of single-plug versus multiple-plug knee OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients undergoing single-plug and multiple-plug OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data of patients undergoing OCA transplantation for large (>2 cm<sup>2</sup>) osteochondral defects of the knee. Thirty patients who underwent multiple-plug (2 + ) OCA transplants (either single surface using the snowman technique or multi-surface) were 1:1 age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) matched with 30 patients who underwent single-plug OCA transplants. PROMs, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores, were obtained both preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Failure was defined as a revision OCA or conversion to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The cohort comprised 30 females (31 affected left knees), with an average age of 37 ± 10.3 years and median follow-up of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 1.7-2.5 years). There was a significant increase in PROMs from the preoperative to the postoperative period for the entire cohort and the single-plug versus multiple-plug subgroups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROM (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were two failures, both in the single-plug group, with a mean time to failure of 3.5 years. There was no difference in the initial outcomes between patients undergoing single-plug versus multiple-plug OCA transplant at the short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::  Level IV, case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"902-909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Outcomes of Single versus Multiple-Plug Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: A Matched Cohort Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Julia S Retzky, Francesca R Coxe, Brittany Ammerman, Ava G Neijna, Paige Hinkley, Andreas H Gomoll, Sabrina M Strickland\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2368-4253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although several prior studies have described the outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for single osteochondral lesions, there is a paucity of comparative data on outcomes of single versus multiple OCA transplants. We aimed to describe the initial outcomes of single-plug versus multiple-plug knee OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients undergoing single-plug and multiple-plug OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data of patients undergoing OCA transplantation for large (>2 cm<sup>2</sup>) osteochondral defects of the knee. Thirty patients who underwent multiple-plug (2 + ) OCA transplants (either single surface using the snowman technique or multi-surface) were 1:1 age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) matched with 30 patients who underwent single-plug OCA transplants. PROMs, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores, were obtained both preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Failure was defined as a revision OCA or conversion to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The cohort comprised 30 females (31 affected left knees), with an average age of 37 ± 10.3 years and median follow-up of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 1.7-2.5 years). There was a significant increase in PROMs from the preoperative to the postoperative period for the entire cohort and the single-plug versus multiple-plug subgroups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROM (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were two failures, both in the single-plug group, with a mean time to failure of 3.5 years. There was no difference in the initial outcomes between patients undergoing single-plug versus multiple-plug OCA transplant at the short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::  Level IV, case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"902-909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2368-4253\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2368-4253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管之前有几项研究描述了单个骨软骨病变的 OCA 移植结果,但比较单个与多个 OCA 移植结果的信息却很少。我们旨在描述单块与多块膝关节OCA移植在至少1年随访后的初步疗效。我们假设,在至少 1 年的随访中,接受单块与多块 OCA 移植的患者在患者报告的结果指标上没有差异:我们对前瞻性收集的因膝关节大面积(>2 平方厘米)骨软骨缺损而接受 OCA 移植的患者数据进行了回顾性分析。30名接受多块(2+)OCA移植(使用雪人技术进行单面移植或多面移植)的患者与30名接受单块OCA移植的患者在年龄、性别和体重指数上进行了1:1配对。术前和术后至少 1 年采集 PROMs,包括 IKDC 和 KOOS 子评分。失败定义为翻修OCA或转为UKA或TKA:结果:队列中有30名女性,31个左膝,平均年龄(37±10.3)岁,中位随访时间为2.0年[四分位间范围:1.7-2.5年]。从术前到术后,整个组群以及单插头与多插头分组的 PROMs 均有明显增加(P0.05)。单插头组有两次失败,平均失败时间为 3.5 年:结论:在短期随访中,接受单塞子与多塞子OCA移植手术的患者在初期疗效上没有差异:IV级,病例系列 关键词:膝关节,髌骨;膝关节,关节软骨;膝关节,一般。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial Outcomes of Single versus Multiple-Plug Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Although several prior studies have described the outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for single osteochondral lesions, there is a paucity of comparative data on outcomes of single versus multiple OCA transplants. We aimed to describe the initial outcomes of single-plug versus multiple-plug knee OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients undergoing single-plug and multiple-plug OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data of patients undergoing OCA transplantation for large (>2 cm2) osteochondral defects of the knee. Thirty patients who underwent multiple-plug (2 + ) OCA transplants (either single surface using the snowman technique or multi-surface) were 1:1 age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) matched with 30 patients who underwent single-plug OCA transplants. PROMs, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores, were obtained both preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Failure was defined as a revision OCA or conversion to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The cohort comprised 30 females (31 affected left knees), with an average age of 37 ± 10.3 years and median follow-up of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 1.7-2.5 years). There was a significant increase in PROMs from the preoperative to the postoperative period for the entire cohort and the single-plug versus multiple-plug subgroups (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROM (p > 0.05). There were two failures, both in the single-plug group, with a mean time to failure of 3.5 years. There was no difference in the initial outcomes between patients undergoing single-plug versus multiple-plug OCA transplant at the short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::  Level IV, case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信