描述商业保险成人群体中脑外伤与阿片类药物使用障碍停药之间的关系。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000964
Jake R Morgan, Sharon Reif, Maureen T Stewart, Marc R Larochelle, Rachel Sayko Adams
{"title":"描述商业保险成人群体中脑外伤与阿片类药物使用障碍停药之间的关系。","authors":"Jake R Morgan, Sharon Reif, Maureen T Stewart, Marc R Larochelle, Rachel Sayko Adams","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Extending prior research that has found that people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience worse substance use treatment outcomes, we examined whether history of TBI was associated with discontinuation of medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), an indicator of receiving evidence-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We used MarketScan claims data to capture inpatient, outpatient, and retail pharmacy utilization from large employers in all 50 states from 2016 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We identified adults aged 18 to 64 initiating non-methadone MOUD (ie, buprenorphine, injectable naltrexone, and oral naltrexone) in 2016-2019. The exposure was whether an individual had a TBI diagnosis in the 2 years before initiating MOUD. During this period, there were 709 individuals with TBI who were then matched with 709 individuals without TBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We created a retrospective cohort of matched individuals with and without TBI and used quasi-experimental methods to identify the association between TBI status and MOUD use. We estimated propensity scores by TBI status and created a 1:1 matched cohort of people with and without TBI who initiated MOUD. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to identify the association between TBI and MOUD discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Main measure: </strong>The outcome was discontinuation of MOUD (ie, a gap of 14 days or more of MOUD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those initiating MOUD, the majority were under 26 years of age, male, and living in an urban setting. Nearly 60% of individuals discontinued medication by 6 months. Adults with TBI had an elevated risk of MOUD discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.27) compared to those without TBI. Additionally, initiating oral naltrexone was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation (HR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.40-1.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found evidence of reduced MOUD retention among people with TBI. Differences in MOUD retention may reflect health care inequities, as there are no medical contraindications to using MOUD for people with TBI or other disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E111-E120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing the Association Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Discontinuation of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in a Commercially Insured Adult Population.\",\"authors\":\"Jake R Morgan, Sharon Reif, Maureen T Stewart, Marc R Larochelle, Rachel Sayko Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Extending prior research that has found that people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience worse substance use treatment outcomes, we examined whether history of TBI was associated with discontinuation of medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), an indicator of receiving evidence-based treatment.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We used MarketScan claims data to capture inpatient, outpatient, and retail pharmacy utilization from large employers in all 50 states from 2016 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We identified adults aged 18 to 64 initiating non-methadone MOUD (ie, buprenorphine, injectable naltrexone, and oral naltrexone) in 2016-2019. The exposure was whether an individual had a TBI diagnosis in the 2 years before initiating MOUD. During this period, there were 709 individuals with TBI who were then matched with 709 individuals without TBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We created a retrospective cohort of matched individuals with and without TBI and used quasi-experimental methods to identify the association between TBI status and MOUD use. We estimated propensity scores by TBI status and created a 1:1 matched cohort of people with and without TBI who initiated MOUD. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to identify the association between TBI and MOUD discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Main measure: </strong>The outcome was discontinuation of MOUD (ie, a gap of 14 days or more of MOUD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those initiating MOUD, the majority were under 26 years of age, male, and living in an urban setting. Nearly 60% of individuals discontinued medication by 6 months. Adults with TBI had an elevated risk of MOUD discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.27) compared to those without TBI. Additionally, initiating oral naltrexone was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation (HR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.40-1.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found evidence of reduced MOUD retention among people with TBI. Differences in MOUD retention may reflect health care inequities, as there are no medical contraindications to using MOUD for people with TBI or other disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E111-E120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671613/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000964\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前的研究发现,脑外伤(TBI)患者的药物使用治疗效果较差,在此基础上,我们研究了脑外伤史是否与停药治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)有关,这是接受循证治疗的一个指标:我们使用 MarketScan 索赔数据来获取 2016 年至 2019 年美国 50 个州大型雇主的住院、门诊和零售药房使用情况:我们确定了 2016-2019 年开始接受非美沙酮 MOUD(即丁丙诺啡、注射用纳曲酮和口服纳曲酮)治疗的 18 至 64 岁成年人。暴露条件为个人在开始使用 MOUD 之前的 2 年内是否被诊断出患有创伤性脑损伤。在此期间,有 709 名患有创伤性脑损伤的患者与 709 名未患有创伤性脑损伤的患者进行了配对:设计:我们创建了一个由患有和未患有 TBI 的配对个体组成的回顾性队列,并使用准实验方法来确定 TBI 状态与 MOUD 使用之间的关联。我们根据 TBI 状态估算了倾向分数,并将开始使用 MOUD 的 TBI 患者和未 TBI 患者建立了 1:1 匹配队列。我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型来确定 TBI 与停用 MOUD 之间的关系。主要测量指标:结果为停用 MOUD(即 MOUD 间隔 14 天或以上):在开始使用 MOUD 的患者中,大多数人年龄在 26 岁以下,为男性,居住在城市环境中。近 60% 的人在 6 个月内停药。与无创伤性脑损伤的人相比,有创伤性脑损伤的成年人停用 MOUD 的风险更高(危险比 [HR] 1.13;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.01-1.27)。此外,开始口服纳曲酮与较高的停药风险相关(HR 1.63;95% CI,1.40-1.90):结论:我们发现有证据表明,创伤性脑损伤患者口服纳曲酮的保留率较低。结论:我们发现有证据表明,有创伤性脑损伤的患者保留MOUD的比例降低了。MOUD保留率的差异可能反映了医疗保健方面的不公平,因为创伤性脑损伤患者或其他残疾患者使用MOUD没有医疗禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing the Association Between Traumatic Brain Injury and Discontinuation of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in a Commercially Insured Adult Population.

Objective: Extending prior research that has found that people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience worse substance use treatment outcomes, we examined whether history of TBI was associated with discontinuation of medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), an indicator of receiving evidence-based treatment.

Setting: We used MarketScan claims data to capture inpatient, outpatient, and retail pharmacy utilization from large employers in all 50 states from 2016 to 2019.

Participants: We identified adults aged 18 to 64 initiating non-methadone MOUD (ie, buprenorphine, injectable naltrexone, and oral naltrexone) in 2016-2019. The exposure was whether an individual had a TBI diagnosis in the 2 years before initiating MOUD. During this period, there were 709 individuals with TBI who were then matched with 709 individuals without TBI.

Design: We created a retrospective cohort of matched individuals with and without TBI and used quasi-experimental methods to identify the association between TBI status and MOUD use. We estimated propensity scores by TBI status and created a 1:1 matched cohort of people with and without TBI who initiated MOUD. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to identify the association between TBI and MOUD discontinuation.

Main measure: The outcome was discontinuation of MOUD (ie, a gap of 14 days or more of MOUD).

Results: Among those initiating MOUD, the majority were under 26 years of age, male, and living in an urban setting. Nearly 60% of individuals discontinued medication by 6 months. Adults with TBI had an elevated risk of MOUD discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.27) compared to those without TBI. Additionally, initiating oral naltrexone was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation (HR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.40-1.90).

Conclusion: We found evidence of reduced MOUD retention among people with TBI. Differences in MOUD retention may reflect health care inequities, as there are no medical contraindications to using MOUD for people with TBI or other disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信