新型抗癌药物关键试验中黑人代表不足:使用估计肌酐清除率评估肾功能的潜在后果?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Morgan A. Butrovich , Allison C. Reaves , Jamie Heyward , Thomas J. Moore , G. Caleb Alexander , Lesley A. Inker , Thomas D. Nolin
{"title":"新型抗癌药物关键试验中黑人代表不足:使用估计肌酐清除率评估肾功能的潜在后果?","authors":"Morgan A. Butrovich ,&nbsp;Allison C. Reaves ,&nbsp;Jamie Heyward ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Moore ,&nbsp;G. Caleb Alexander ,&nbsp;Lesley A. Inker ,&nbsp;Thomas D. Nolin","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Black individuals are historically underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. One potential reason for this is the prevalence of kidney disease in Black individuals, utilization of estimated creatinine clearance as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in oncology, and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We characterized the representation of racial minorities in anticancer agent pivotal trials and examined if GFR-based trial eligibility criteria impact the proportion of Black individuals in trial populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We constructed a data repository for anticancer drugs FDA-approved from 2015 to 2019 and associated pivotal trials, from which we extracted trial population racial compositions and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We calculated the participation-to-incidence ratio (PIR) and participation-to-mortality ratio (PMR) for a variety of cancer sites, where PIR or PMR &gt;1.2 and &lt;0.8 indicate overrepresentation and underrepresentation, respectively. We evaluated the relationship between GFR eligibility cutoffs and the proportion of Black enrollees with Spearman rank correlation coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We assessed 24,698 patients in 74 trials. Black individuals were underrepresented in all trials (PIR ≤0.48, PMR ≤0.50). For trials with GFR-based eligibility criteria (<em>n</em> = 49), a lower GFR cutoff was modestly associated with a higher proportion of Black enrollees (<em>r</em> = −0.29, <em>p</em> = 0.039). This relationship was strengthened for trials that only used estimated creatinine clearance to estimate GFR (<em>r</em> = −0.43, <em>p</em> = 0.004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GFR-related eligibility, and specifically the use of estimated creatinine clearance, may contribute to Black individuals being disproportionately excluded from cancer clinical trials. This highlights the need for implementation of contemporary GFR equations and other interventions to boost racial minority trial enrollment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 107631"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002143/pdfft?md5=ca4affbde7e96d6a559f480b25968e30&pid=1-s2.0-S1551714424002143-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underrepresentation of black individuals in pivotal trials for novel anticancer drugs: Potential consequence of using estimated creatinine clearance to assess kidney function?\",\"authors\":\"Morgan A. Butrovich ,&nbsp;Allison C. Reaves ,&nbsp;Jamie Heyward ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Moore ,&nbsp;G. Caleb Alexander ,&nbsp;Lesley A. Inker ,&nbsp;Thomas D. Nolin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Black individuals are historically underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. One potential reason for this is the prevalence of kidney disease in Black individuals, utilization of estimated creatinine clearance as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in oncology, and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We characterized the representation of racial minorities in anticancer agent pivotal trials and examined if GFR-based trial eligibility criteria impact the proportion of Black individuals in trial populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We constructed a data repository for anticancer drugs FDA-approved from 2015 to 2019 and associated pivotal trials, from which we extracted trial population racial compositions and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We calculated the participation-to-incidence ratio (PIR) and participation-to-mortality ratio (PMR) for a variety of cancer sites, where PIR or PMR &gt;1.2 and &lt;0.8 indicate overrepresentation and underrepresentation, respectively. We evaluated the relationship between GFR eligibility cutoffs and the proportion of Black enrollees with Spearman rank correlation coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We assessed 24,698 patients in 74 trials. Black individuals were underrepresented in all trials (PIR ≤0.48, PMR ≤0.50). For trials with GFR-based eligibility criteria (<em>n</em> = 49), a lower GFR cutoff was modestly associated with a higher proportion of Black enrollees (<em>r</em> = −0.29, <em>p</em> = 0.039). This relationship was strengthened for trials that only used estimated creatinine clearance to estimate GFR (<em>r</em> = −0.43, <em>p</em> = 0.004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GFR-related eligibility, and specifically the use of estimated creatinine clearance, may contribute to Black individuals being disproportionately excluded from cancer clinical trials. This highlights the need for implementation of contemporary GFR equations and other interventions to boost racial minority trial enrollment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002143/pdfft?md5=ca4affbde7e96d6a559f480b25968e30&pid=1-s2.0-S1551714424002143-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黑人参与肿瘤临床试验的人数历来偏低。造成这种情况的一个潜在原因是黑人肾脏疾病的流行、肿瘤学中使用估计肌酐清除率作为肾小球滤过率(GFR)的替代指标以及基于 GFR 的试验资格标准。我们描述了少数种族在抗癌药物关键试验中的代表性,并研究了基于肾小球滤过率的试验资格标准是否会影响试验人群中黑人的比例:我们为 FDA 批准的 2015-2019 年抗癌药物及相关关键试验构建了一个数据存储库,从中提取了试验人群的种族构成和基于 GFR 的试验资格标准。我们计算了各种癌症部位的参与度与发病率之比(PIR)和参与度与死亡率之比(PMR),其中 PIR 或 PMR >1.2 和结果:我们对 74 项试验中的 24,698 名患者进行了评估。黑人在所有试验中的比例都偏低(PIR ≤0.48,PMR ≤0.50)。对于基于 GFR 资格标准的试验(n = 49),较低的 GFR 临界值与较高的黑人参试者比例略有关联(r = -0.29,p = 0.039)。对于仅使用肌酐清除率估算值来估算 GFR 的试验,这种关系得到了加强(r = -0.43,p = 0.004):结论:与肾小球滤过率相关的资格审查,特别是使用估计肌酐清除率,可能会导致黑人过多地被排除在癌症临床试验之外。结论:与 GFR 相关的资格审查,特别是使用肌酐清除率估算值,可能会导致黑人被排除在癌症临床试验之外的比例过高,这凸显了实施现代 GFR 方程和其他干预措施以提高少数种族试验注册率的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Underrepresentation of black individuals in pivotal trials for novel anticancer drugs: Potential consequence of using estimated creatinine clearance to assess kidney function?

Background

Black individuals are historically underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. One potential reason for this is the prevalence of kidney disease in Black individuals, utilization of estimated creatinine clearance as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in oncology, and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We characterized the representation of racial minorities in anticancer agent pivotal trials and examined if GFR-based trial eligibility criteria impact the proportion of Black individuals in trial populations.

Methods

We constructed a data repository for anticancer drugs FDA-approved from 2015 to 2019 and associated pivotal trials, from which we extracted trial population racial compositions and GFR-based trial eligibility criteria. We calculated the participation-to-incidence ratio (PIR) and participation-to-mortality ratio (PMR) for a variety of cancer sites, where PIR or PMR >1.2 and <0.8 indicate overrepresentation and underrepresentation, respectively. We evaluated the relationship between GFR eligibility cutoffs and the proportion of Black enrollees with Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

Results

We assessed 24,698 patients in 74 trials. Black individuals were underrepresented in all trials (PIR ≤0.48, PMR ≤0.50). For trials with GFR-based eligibility criteria (n = 49), a lower GFR cutoff was modestly associated with a higher proportion of Black enrollees (r = −0.29, p = 0.039). This relationship was strengthened for trials that only used estimated creatinine clearance to estimate GFR (r = −0.43, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

GFR-related eligibility, and specifically the use of estimated creatinine clearance, may contribute to Black individuals being disproportionately excluded from cancer clinical trials. This highlights the need for implementation of contemporary GFR equations and other interventions to boost racial minority trial enrollment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信