免疫反应的种族差异只能部分解释系统性硬化症疾病严重程度的不同。

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kamini E Kuchinad, Ji Soo Kim, Adrianne Woods, Gwen Leatherman, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Maureen D Mayes, Robyn Domsic, Paula S Ramos, Richard M Silver, John Varga, Lesley Ann Saketkoo, Suzanne Kafaja, Victoria K Shanmugan, Jessica Gordon, Lorinda Chung, Elana J Bernstein, Pravitt Gourh, Francesco Boin, Daniel L Kastner, Scott L Zeger, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Fredrick M Wigley, Ami A Shah
{"title":"免疫反应的种族差异只能部分解释系统性硬化症疾病严重程度的不同。","authors":"Kamini E Kuchinad, Ji Soo Kim, Adrianne Woods, Gwen Leatherman, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Maureen D Mayes, Robyn Domsic, Paula S Ramos, Richard M Silver, John Varga, Lesley Ann Saketkoo, Suzanne Kafaja, Victoria K Shanmugan, Jessica Gordon, Lorinda Chung, Elana J Bernstein, Pravitt Gourh, Francesco Boin, Daniel L Kastner, Scott L Zeger, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Fredrick M Wigley, Ami A Shah","doi":"10.1136/ard-2023-225458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand if autoantibodies account for racial variation in disease severity, we compared autoantibody distribution and associated phenotype between self-identified black and white systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>803 black and 2178 white SSc patients had systematic testing for autoantibodies using Euroimmun (centromere (ACA), RNA-polymerase III (POLR3), Scl70, PM/Scl, NOR90, Th/To, Ku, U3RNP and Ro52) and commercial ELISA (U1RNP). In this observational study, logistic regression was performed to assess the association between self-identified race and outcomes, adjusting for autoantibodies. To estimate whether the effect of race was mediated by autoantibody status, race coefficients from multivariate models including and excluding autoantibodies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-Scl70, anti-U1RNP, anti-U3RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-Ku and anti-NOR90 were more common in the black cohort than in the white cohort, which was enriched for ACA, anti-POLR3 and anti-PM/Scl. Black individuals had a higher prevalence of severe Raynaud's, skin, lung, gastrointestinal and renal disease whereas white individuals had a higher prevalence of severe heart and muscle disease. Adjusting for autoantibodies decreased the effect of race on outcome for telangiectasias, forced vital capacity <70%, pulmonary hypertension and severe lung, heart, muscle and gastrointestinal disease by 11%-44% and increased the association between race and renal crisis and severe kidney disease by 37%-52%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the largest systematic analysis of autoantibody responses in a geographically diverse population of black SSc patients. Black and white individuals with SSc have distinct autoantibody profiles. Autoantibodies explain only a fraction of the effect of race on clinical outcomes, suggesting other factors contribute to disparate outcomes between these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial variability in immune responses only partially explains differential systemic sclerosis disease severity.\",\"authors\":\"Kamini E Kuchinad, Ji Soo Kim, Adrianne Woods, Gwen Leatherman, Laura Gutierrez-Alamillo, Maureen D Mayes, Robyn Domsic, Paula S Ramos, Richard M Silver, John Varga, Lesley Ann Saketkoo, Suzanne Kafaja, Victoria K Shanmugan, Jessica Gordon, Lorinda Chung, Elana J Bernstein, Pravitt Gourh, Francesco Boin, Daniel L Kastner, Scott L Zeger, Livia Casciola-Rosen, Fredrick M Wigley, Ami A Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ard-2023-225458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand if autoantibodies account for racial variation in disease severity, we compared autoantibody distribution and associated phenotype between self-identified black and white systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>803 black and 2178 white SSc patients had systematic testing for autoantibodies using Euroimmun (centromere (ACA), RNA-polymerase III (POLR3), Scl70, PM/Scl, NOR90, Th/To, Ku, U3RNP and Ro52) and commercial ELISA (U1RNP). In this observational study, logistic regression was performed to assess the association between self-identified race and outcomes, adjusting for autoantibodies. To estimate whether the effect of race was mediated by autoantibody status, race coefficients from multivariate models including and excluding autoantibodies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-Scl70, anti-U1RNP, anti-U3RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-Ku and anti-NOR90 were more common in the black cohort than in the white cohort, which was enriched for ACA, anti-POLR3 and anti-PM/Scl. Black individuals had a higher prevalence of severe Raynaud's, skin, lung, gastrointestinal and renal disease whereas white individuals had a higher prevalence of severe heart and muscle disease. Adjusting for autoantibodies decreased the effect of race on outcome for telangiectasias, forced vital capacity <70%, pulmonary hypertension and severe lung, heart, muscle and gastrointestinal disease by 11%-44% and increased the association between race and renal crisis and severe kidney disease by 37%-52%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the largest systematic analysis of autoantibody responses in a geographically diverse population of black SSc patients. Black and white individuals with SSc have distinct autoantibody profiles. Autoantibodies explain only a fraction of the effect of race on clinical outcomes, suggesting other factors contribute to disparate outcomes between these groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-225458\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-225458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的方法:803 名黑人和 2178 名白人 SSc 患者使用 Euroimmun(中心粒 (ACA)、RNA 聚合酶 III (POLR3)、Scl70、PM/Scl、NOR90、Th/To、Ku、U3RNP 和 Ro52)和商用 ELISA(U1RNP)系统检测了自身抗体。在这项观察性研究中,对自身抗体进行调整后,采用逻辑回归法评估自我认定的种族与结果之间的关系。为了估计种族的影响是否由自身抗体状态介导,比较了包括和不包括自身抗体的多变量模型中的种族系数:黑人队列中抗Scl70、抗U1RNP、抗U3RNP、抗Th/To、抗Ku和抗NOR90比白人队列中更常见,而白人队列中则富含ACA、抗POLR3和抗PM/Scl。对自身抗体进行调整后,种族对毛细血管扩张症、强迫生命体征能力结果的影响有所降低:这项研究是对不同地域的黑人 SSc 患者自身抗体反应进行的最大规模的系统分析。黑人和白人 SSc 患者的自身抗体情况截然不同。自身抗体只能解释种族对临床结果影响的一小部分,这表明其他因素导致了这些群体之间的结果差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial variability in immune responses only partially explains differential systemic sclerosis disease severity.

Objective: To understand if autoantibodies account for racial variation in disease severity, we compared autoantibody distribution and associated phenotype between self-identified black and white systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.

Methods: 803 black and 2178 white SSc patients had systematic testing for autoantibodies using Euroimmun (centromere (ACA), RNA-polymerase III (POLR3), Scl70, PM/Scl, NOR90, Th/To, Ku, U3RNP and Ro52) and commercial ELISA (U1RNP). In this observational study, logistic regression was performed to assess the association between self-identified race and outcomes, adjusting for autoantibodies. To estimate whether the effect of race was mediated by autoantibody status, race coefficients from multivariate models including and excluding autoantibodies were compared.

Results: Anti-Scl70, anti-U1RNP, anti-U3RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-Ku and anti-NOR90 were more common in the black cohort than in the white cohort, which was enriched for ACA, anti-POLR3 and anti-PM/Scl. Black individuals had a higher prevalence of severe Raynaud's, skin, lung, gastrointestinal and renal disease whereas white individuals had a higher prevalence of severe heart and muscle disease. Adjusting for autoantibodies decreased the effect of race on outcome for telangiectasias, forced vital capacity <70%, pulmonary hypertension and severe lung, heart, muscle and gastrointestinal disease by 11%-44% and increased the association between race and renal crisis and severe kidney disease by 37%-52%.

Conclusions: This study is the largest systematic analysis of autoantibody responses in a geographically diverse population of black SSc patients. Black and white individuals with SSc have distinct autoantibody profiles. Autoantibodies explain only a fraction of the effect of race on clinical outcomes, suggesting other factors contribute to disparate outcomes between these groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信